Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Judith and Edward Ward Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$90kEducation$74kReligion$68kHuman Services$31kInternational$21kRecreation & Sports$21kPhilanthropy$14kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$373k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CJD FOUNDATION$5,000
CLARIDON CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$5,000
OTTERBEIN COLLEGE$5,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$4,000
PROVIDENCE HOUSE$3,000
MONASTERY OF POOR CLARES$3,000
PEGASUS FARM$2,000
JULIE BILLIART SCHOOLS$2,000
SALVATION ARMY OF NORTHEAST OHIO$2,000
SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME$2,000
CROSSROADS FOUNDATION$2,000
WOMENSAFE INC$2,000
WORLD VISION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$352k · 22 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
2

Total granted

$352k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+37%

Still filing today

36%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsInternationalEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +178%
  • PH
    PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +201%
  • CF
    CROSSROADS FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $14k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • CS
    CLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE BLINDgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +37%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
2
Hope for Cleveland's Children
—
3
Choices for Victims of Domestic Violence

To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…

Human Services
4
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
5
Covenant House

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
6
House of New Hope Inc

It is our mission to demonstrate the love and compassion of jesus christ by protecting and enhancing the safety and well-being of persons from all backgrounds and across the continuum of life through the effective integration of the…

Human Services
7
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
8
Pathway Caring for Children

Our mission is to help children and families realize the possibilities of their lives through foster care, adoption, and mental health. we serve over 1,700 children and families in 14 northeast ohio counties.

Health
9
The Center for Women and Families Inc

To help victims of intimate partner abuse or sexual violence become survivors through supportive services, community education and cooperative partnerships that foster hope, promote self-sufficiency and rebuild lives.

Human Services
10
The Children's Home of Pittsburgh

The children's home of pittsburgh, established in 1893, is an independent, non-profit licensed organization whose purpose is to promote the health and well-being of infants and children through services which establish and strengthen the…

Health
11
Crisis Center of West Texas

Crisis center of west texas' mission is to respond, shelter, and educate to end domestic and sexual violence in west texas.

—
12
Vision House

To provide safe and confidential transitional housing and services for homeless families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is OhioGuidestone; the most unlike its peers is Crossroads Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLARIDON CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $44,000 · OtherCLARIDON CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHOTTERBEIN COLLEGE: $43,000 · OtherOTTERBEIN COLLEGECREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC: $41,000 · OtherCREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INCALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $35,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONJULIE BILLIART SCHOOL: $28,500 · OtherJULIE BILLIART SCHOOLPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $20,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE HOUSE INCIndividual grant recipient: $16,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPOOR CLARE COLETTINE CORPORATION: $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · Other+10 more: $53,000 · Other+10 moreWORLD VISION INC: $10,500 · InternationalCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $10,500 · InternationalCROSSROADS FOUNDATION: $14,000 · PhilanthropyOhioGuidestone: $12,000 · HealthPEGASUS FARM: $11,500 · Recreation & SportsCLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $2,000 · Human ServicesAGAPE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $2,000 · Education
Other$305,000International$21,000Philanthropy$14,000Health$12,000Recreation & Sports$11,500Human Services$2,000Education$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC: $41,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $20,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetOhioGuidestone: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPEGASUS FARM: $11,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENSAFE INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGAPE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OhioGuidestone ↗
  • Who funds PEGASUS FARM ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENSAFE INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Judith and Edward Ward Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Judith and Edward Ward Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Judith and Edward Ward Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Judith and Edward Ward Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Judith and Edward Ward’s filings →

    More from the funding graph