Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Joseph H & Ellen B Thomas Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$226k
Granted FY2024still arriving
63
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$406kHealth$330kEducation$205kYouth Development$43kReligion$25kCrime & Legal$21kFood & Nutrition$16kPhilanthropy$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k57 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $116k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$400
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY CIRCLE$50,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC$44,905
CHILDREN'S GUILD$25,950
DENISON UNIVERSITY$25,000
UNITED WAY$10,000
CASE WESTERN RESERVE$10,000
STPAUL'S CHURCH$5,000
PLAYHOUSE SQUARE$5,000
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS$5,000
OVERLAND SUMMER FUND$5,000
CHURCH OF THE WESTERN RESERVE$5,000
HIRAM HOUSE$3,700
THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDENTS$3,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$3,000
NATIONWIDE HOSPITAL$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $50) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $50 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NE
VA
MD
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 74 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

74 repeat relationships: 52 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
29

Total granted

$1.0M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+5%

Still filing today

35%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED
    5× · 2020–2024 · $202k · revenue +29%
  • DU
    DENISON UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $142k · revenue +20%
  • CI
    CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF MUSIC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $126k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue -28%
  • SP
    ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • MF
    Mid-Ohio Foodbank
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
2
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
3
The City Club of Cleveland

The city club of cleveland's mission is to create conversations of consequence that help democracy thrive. we do this in pursuit of our vision of strong, informed individuals and communities that prize freedom of speech and civil, civic…

Education
4
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
5
The Ohio Environmental Council

To protect the environment and health of all ohio communities through legal and policy advocacy, decision-maker accountability, and civic engagement.

Environment
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
The Cleveland Institute of Art

The mission statement of the cleveland institute of art is as follows: to cultivate creative leaders who inspire people, strengthen communities, and contribute to a thriving and sustainable economy through an innovative education in art…

Education
8
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
11
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
12
Cleveland Arts Prize

The cleveland arts prize identifies, rewards, publicly honors and promotes those creative artists whose original work and accomplishments have set a standard of excellence to which other artists can aspire. additionally, the cleveland arts…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Cleveland; the most unlike its peers is Overland Summers Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 114 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
29/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEVELAND CLINIC: $144,715 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINICCHILDREN'S GUILD OF CLEVELAND: $40,250 · OtherCHILDREN'S GUILD OF CLEVELANDUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $32,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALSSTPAUL'S CHURCH: $30,100 · OtherSTPAUL'S CHURCHUNITED WAY: $30,000 · OtherUNITED WAYCHILDRENS GUILD: $27,950 · OtherPLAYHOUSE SQUARE: $25,000 · OtherCHAGRIN DOCUMENTARY FILM FESTIVAL: $21,500 · OtherCASE WESTERN RESERVE: $20,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $20,000 · Other+83 more: $138,085 · Other+83 moreDENISON UNIVERSITY: $141,800 · EducationDENISON UNIVERSITYCLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $125,800 · EducationCLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF MUSICCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY+4 more: $7,450 · EducationUNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED: $202,100 · Community ImprovementUNIVERSITY CIRCLE INC…OVERLAND SUMMERS FOUNDATION INC: $15,500 · Youth DevelopmentIDEASTREAM: $1,100 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $11,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SANCTUARY GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $2,850 · PhilanthropyCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $5,000 · Arts & CultureThe Musical Arts Association: $4,550 · Arts & CultureNORTHEASTERN EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION OF OHIO INC: $425 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $800 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 · HealthHELPHOPELIVE INC: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $100 · Health
Other$530,100Education$305,050Community Improvement$202,100Youth Development$16,600Philanthropy$13,850Arts & Culture$10,775Health$4,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED: $202,100 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY: $141,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $125,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS GUILD: $27,950 over 2y, 45% of budgetOVERLAND SUMMERS FOUNDATION INC: $15,500 over 5y, 11% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HIRAM HOUSE: $7,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL: $5,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association: $4,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SANCTUARY GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $2,850 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPIANO INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF NORTHERN OH: $1,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTWO FOUNDATION INC TWO CAFE & BOUTIQUE: $1,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $1,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOURNEY CENTER FOR SAFETY AND HEALING: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIDEASTREAM: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL: $1,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY INC: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION OF OHIO INC: $425 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITY CLUB: $300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAND STUDIO INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELEVATE ORPHAN: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND POPS ORCHESTRA: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Lantern: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND COUNCIL ON WORLD AFFAIRS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPSTONE ACADEMY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS GUILD ↗
  • Who funds OVERLAND SUMMERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds THE HIRAM HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds The Musical Arts Association ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SANCTUARY GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH24.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · John P Murphy Foundation · The Albert B & Audrey G Ratner Family Foundation · The Kelvin & Eleanor Smith Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Kulas Foundation · Emma R Fox Char Trust Mut Fds · The Andrews Foundation · Richard Horvitz and Erica Hartman-Horvitz Foundation · The Catherine L & Edward a Lozick Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joseph H & Ellen B Thomas Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joseph H & Ellen B Thomas Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation: 4% of income from government
  • Simmons University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 114 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph H & Ellen B Thomas’ filings →

More from the funding graph