Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Joseph B Gould Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$115k
Granted FY2020
11
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$27k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Joseph B Gould Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Bank Of America Charitable Gift Fd, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Joseph B Gould Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $115k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
18
5
19
5
20
0
21
0
22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182022.

Recreation & Sports$2.3MPhilanthropy$1.2MEducation$98kHuman Services$36kHealth$27kAnimals$25kArts & Culture$12kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2020 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $99k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORT LEWIS COLLEGE MEN'S SOCCER$26,500
PASADENA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
RICHSTONE FAMILY CENTER$12,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY$10,000
REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK$10,000
NAVAJO NATION$10,000
COMMITTEE OF THE SHELTERLESS$10,000
BEACH CITY HEALTH DISTRICT$5,000
JOHN GETZELMAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND$5,000
PETALUMA VALLEY ROTARY TRUST$5,000
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 37% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1.1M → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY: $10k → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA: $5k → 10%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $600 → 14%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVATORY: $10k → 17%NAVAJO NATION: $10k → 32%ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%USA SWIMMING FOUNDATION: $2.0M → 9%FORT LEWIS COLLEGE MEN'S SOCCER: $29k → 12%BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $4k → 16%REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $10k → 9%RICHSTONE FAMILY CENTER: $16k → 14%ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%USA SWIMMING FOUNDATION: $250k → 9%FORT LEWIS COLLEGE MEN'S SOCCER: $28k → 12%SOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH: $5k → 9%RICHSTONE FAMILY CENTER: $12k → 14%ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION: $6k → 17%FORT LEWIS COLLEGE MEN'S SOCCER: $27k → 12%RICHSTONE FAMILY CENTER: $8k → 14%JOHN GETZELMAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $5k → 14%JOHN GETZELMAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $5k → 14%JOHN GETZELMAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $5k → 14%JOHN DOUGLAS FRENCH ALZHEIMER'S: $3k → 14%GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE: $1k → 14%GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE: $1k → 14%PASADENA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%PASADENA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%BEACH CITY HEALTH DISTRICT: $5k → 14%ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%PASADENA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 7 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$2.4M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+138%

Still filing today

57%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20
HealthAnimalsRecreation & SportsArts & CultureFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    USA Swimming Foundation Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $2.3M · revenue +56% · 43% of their budget
  • ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $16k · revenue +57%
  • GP
    GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $2k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CP
    CENTRAL PARK CONSERVATORY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • SA
    SOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
2
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
3
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
4
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
5
Peninsula Humane Society & Spca

The peninsula humane society & spca, guided by the humane ethic, builds healthy relationships between people and animals.

Animals
6
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
7
The California Endowment
Philanthropy
8
California City Animal Outreach Foundation

The foundation supports the california city animal shelter and community companion animals. our dedicated goals of extended rescue and adoption lifelines, spay and neuter promotion. education awareness and quality of life improvements will…

Animals
9
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
10
Friends of Oakland Animal Services

Our mission is to provide homes, health, and happiness to oakland's animals in need. our primary focus has been to fund programs and activities at oakland animal services to greatly increase lifesaving of shelter animals.

Animals
11
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
12
Humane Society Silicon Valley

At humane society silicon valley, our mission is to save lives, keep families together, and create a better future for pets and their people.(see schedule o for continuation)

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Society of Sonoma County and the most unlike its peers is Petaluma Valley Rotary Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

USA Swimming Foundation Inc — $2,250,000 · Recreation & SportsUSA Swimming Foundation IncBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD — $1,144,876 · PhilanthropyBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FDPasadena Community Foundation — $40,000 · PhilanthropyFORT LEWIS COLLEGE MEN'S SOCCER — $83,400 · OtherRICHSTONE FAMILY CENTER — $35,500 · OtherJOHN GETZELMAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $15,000 · OtherCENTRAL PARK CONSERVATORY — $10,000 · OtherCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS — $10,000 · OtherNAVAJO NATION — $10,000 · OtherGREYHOUND ADOPTION CENTER — $10,000 · Other+6 more — $19,600 · OtherELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 · HealthHUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY — $10,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY — $5,000 · AnimalsREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $10,000 · Food & NutritionPOLLY KLAAS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Crime & LegalGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC — $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Recreation & Sports$2,250,000Philanthropy$1,184,876Other$193,500Health$17,500Animals$15,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Crime & Legal$5,000Arts & Culture$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUSA Swimming Foundation Inc — $2,250,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD — $1,144,876 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPasadena Community Foundation — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREYHOUND ADOPTION CENTER — $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPETALUMA VALLEY ROTARY TRUST — $5,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetPOLLY KLAAS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Joseph B Gould Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph