Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jones Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$7.5MYouth Development$1.5MEducation$1.1MPhilanthropy$1.0MHuman Services$253kArts & Culture$174kScience & Tech$130kFood & Nutrition$81kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $475k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.0M
$15,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$500,000
JOHNS HOPKINS$250,000
CHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER$250,000
NOBLE FOUNDATION$200,000
CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION$125,000
MAYO CLINIC$100,000
HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL$50,000
SAUGATUCK CENTER FOR THE ARTS$25,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$25,000
NORTHSTAR REACH$25,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
ARBOR HOSPICE$15,000
LADIES OF LUPUS FOUNDATION$10,000
UM HEINZ PRECHTER RESEARCH FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $967k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HEROS AND HORSES: $10k → 10%HEROS AND HORSES: $10k → 10%CHAD TOUGH FOUNDATION: $60k → 21%CHAD TOUGH FOUNDATION: $50k → 21%CHAD TOUGH FOUNDATION: $50k → 21%CANINE ASSISTED THERAPY: $4k → 13%ANGELA HOSPICE: $2k → 21%CANINE ASSISTED THERAPY: $2k → 13%CANINE ASSISTED THERAPY: $2k → 13%CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $125k → 14%CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $125k → 14%ChadTough Foundation: $110k → 14%CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $110k → 14%CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $103k → 14%CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%ARBOR HOSPICE: $20k → 14%ARBOR HOSPICE: $20k → 14%ARBOR HOSPICE: $15k → 14%ARBOR HOSPICE: $15k → 14%Arbor Hospice: $15k → 14%ARBOR HOSPICE: $10k → 14%ARBOR HOSPICE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
VA
MD
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 48 repeat orgs$834k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
35

Total granted

$13M
$787k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+11%

Still filing today

31%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $833k · revenue +220%
  • HC
    HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +43%
  • SC
    SAUGATUCK CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $140k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $500k
  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +30%
  • SC
    SUNSHINE CHILDREN'S HOME
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
2
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
3
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
4
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
5
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
6
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
7
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
8
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
9
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
10
Gaston Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

To engage and inspire our community to support caromont health in providing compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
11
Gaston Memorial Hospital Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
12
Breastcancerorg

Our mission is to help people make sense of the complex medical and personal information about breast health and breast cancer, so they can make the best decisions for their lives.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shake a Leg Miami Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Gibson Foundation Gibson. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
21/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR CENTER - MOTT: $1,500,000 · OtherPEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR CENTER - MOTTIndividual grant recipient: $1,500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPEDIACTRIC BRAIN TUMOR CENTER: $1,500,000 · OtherPEDIACTRIC BRAIN TUMOR CENTERNOBLE FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · OtherNOBLE FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN - EXECUTIVE: $900,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN - EXECUTIVEJOHNS HOPKINS: $800,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINSUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN - EXECUTIVE MEDICINE PROGRAM: $600,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN - EXECUTIVE MEDICINE PROGRAMIndividual grant recipient: $500,000 · Other+56 more: $1,919,768 · Other+56 moreCHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER: $750,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S…MAYO CLINIC: $300,000 · HealthMAYO CLINI…HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL INC: $180,000 · HealthHOLY CROSS…DYNAMI FOUNDATION: $55,000 · Health+7 more: $45,500 · HealthNORTH STAR REACH: $1,225,000 · Youth DevelopmentNORTH STAR…ELE'S PLACE INC: $50,000 · Youth Development+3 more: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $832,500 · Human ServicesArbor Hospice Inc: $105,000 · Human Services+3 more: $29,500 · Human ServicesSAUGATUCK CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $140,016 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF DISCOVERY AND SCIENCE INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureSuicide Awareness Voices of Education: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GIBSON FOUNDATION GIBSON: $20,000 · PhilanthropyYELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,600 · PhilanthropyTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$10,219,768Health$1,330,500Youth Development$1,310,000Human Services$967,000Arts & Culture$205,016Philanthropy$29,600Public Safety & Disaster$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH STAR REACH: $1,225,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $832,500 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER: $750,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOLY CROSS HOSPITAL INC: $180,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAUGATUCK CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $140,016 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetArbor Hospice Inc: $105,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDYNAMI FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMUSEUM OF DISCOVERY AND SCIENCE INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRIEVEWELL: $25,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetHEROES AND HORSES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGIRLS GROUP: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSuicide Awareness Voices of Education: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSHAKE A LEG MIAMI INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEAL THE PLANET TOGETHER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MIAMI INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANDEE'S ARMY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetYELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANINE ASSISTED THERAPY INC: $7,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BIRCH STATE PARK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SALINE AREA SCHOOLS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHOLLAND FISH & GAME CLUB: $3,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetANGELA HOSPICE HOME CARE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH STAR REACH ↗
  • Who funds CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SAUGATUCK CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Arbor Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds DYNAMI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF DISCOVERY AND SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GRIEVEWELL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ann Arbor Area Community FoundationMI17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · WK Kellogg Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Alfred & Rose Miniaci Foundation Inc · Weiser Charitable Foundation · James a and Faith Knight Foundation · United Way of Washtenaw County · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Ford Philanthropy · DTE Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jones Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jones Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Museum of Discovery and Science Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
  • Holy Cross Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jones Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph