Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jolley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
87
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$4.8MHuman Services$2.9MHealth$2.7MHousing & Shelter$2.5MPhilanthropy$1.8MArts & Culture$1.3MCommunity Improvement$1.1MYouth Development$1.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 87 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k62 grants · $1.5M
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.2M
$30,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES$150,000
THE CITY OF GREENVILLE$100,000
ALIANZA HISPANA HISPANIC ALLIANCE$75,000
UNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY$75,000
URBAN LEAGUE OF THE UPSTATE$65,000
GREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION$65,000
PENDLETON PLACE INC$60,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE$60,000
UNITY HEALTH ON MAIN$60,000
UPSTATE PRIDE SC$50,000
WOMENS RIGHTS AND EMPOWERMENT$50,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$50,000
GREATER GOOD GREENVILLE$50,000
SUSTAINING WAY$50,000
COLLEGE UNBOUND$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $3.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PHILLIS WHEATLEY ASSOCIATION: $50k → 17%UPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS: $75k → 10%PHILLIS WHEATLEY ASSOCIATION: $50k → 17%UPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS: $35k → 10%WOMENS RIGHTS AND EMPOWERMENT NETWORK: $60k → 16%UPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION: $70k → 10%SENIOR ACTION INC: $50k → 10%UPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION: $50k → 10%UPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION: $45k → 10%UPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTIONS INC: $40k → 10%greer relief & resources agency inc: $45k → 10%greer relief & resources agency inc: $45k → 10%CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $40k → 10%CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $40k → 10%mill community ministries: $185k → 10%MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $185k → 10%MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $150k → 10%mill community ministries: $150k → 10%NEIGHBORHOOD FOCUS: $50k → 10%neighborhood focus: $50k → 10%MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $47k → 10%MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $47k → 10%NEIGHBORHOOD FOCUS: $45k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $70k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $65k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $60k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $60k → 10%pendleton place inc: $60k → 10%ymca of greenville: $50k → 10%ALIANZA HISPANA HISPANIC ALLIANCE: $90k → 10%ALIANZA HISPANA HISPANIC ALLIANCE: $90k → 10%pendleton place inc: $45k → 10%ALIANZA HISPANA HISPANIC ALLIANCE: $75k → 10%Alianza Hispana Hispanic Alliance: $75k → 10%Alianza Hispana Hispanic Alliance: $70k → 10%URBAN LEAGUE OF THE UPSTATE: $65k → 10%FOSTERING GREAT IDEAS: $50k → 10%urban league of the upstate: $50k → 10%PHILLIS WHEATLEY ASSOCIATION: $50k → 10%urban league of the upstate: $45k → 10%ALIANZA HISPANA HISPANIC ALLIANCE: $45k → 10%URBAN LEAGUE OF THE UPSTATE: $45k → 10%URBAN LEAGUE OF THE UPSTATE: $45k → 10%NICHOLTOWN CHILD AND FAMILY COLLABORATIVE: $40k → 10%nicholtown child and family collaborative: $40k → 10%NICHOLTOWN CHILD AND FAMILY COLLABORATIVE: $40k → 10%Urban League of the Upstate: $40k → 10%Homeless period project: $35k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
OH
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 129 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

129 repeat relationships: 74 still active in FY2025, 55 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

129
74

Total granted

$23M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+13%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $350k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    Prisma Health
    2× · 2022–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +5%
  • RANDOLPH COLLEGE INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $885k · revenue +3%
  • MV
    MILL VILLAGE MINISTRIES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $814k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • GM
    GREENVILLE MEDICAL CLINIC
    one grant, 2021 · $123k · revenue 0% · 37% of their budget
  • CH
    CATHOLIC HEALTH PARTNERS
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
  • WR
    WOMENS RIGHTS AND EMPOWERMENT NETWORK
    one grant, 2019 · $60k · revenue -59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville Theatre Arts Center
—
2
Foundation for a Greater Greenwood County Inc

Providing leadership to enhance the quality of life in greenwood through strategic long-term vision and collaborative community development initiatives.

Philanthropy
3
Greenville Area Development Corporation

Promoting and enhancing the economic growth and development of greenville county south carolina; gadc was formed by greenville county council.

Community Improvement
4
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
5
South Carolina Business & Industry Political Education Committee

Promoting and protecting the free private and competitive enterprise system through research and education.

—
6
South Carolina Council On Competitiveness

The south carolina council on competitiveness is a nonpartisan, business-led non-profit organization committed to advancing the long term competitiveness of south carolina through actionable research, support of industry clusters and…

Community Improvement
7
South Carolina Policy Council Education Foundation

The south carolina policy council was founded in 1986 as an independent, private, non-partisan research organization to promote the principles of limited government, free enterprise, and individual liberty and responsibility in the state…

—
8
Sc Chamber of Commerce

Enhancing the quality of life for all south carolinians, achieving global competiteveness and ultimately increasing prosperity for sc citizens.

—
9
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
10
Community Industry Value Interactionist League

NC CIVIL is a nonprofit community impact organization that develops grassroots approaches to structural disparities. Our mission is to increase resident involvement, improve organization of resources, and help institutions partner…

Youth Development
11
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
12
Greenwood Genetic Center Inc

The greenwood genetic center is a nonprofit institute centered on clinical genetic services, diagnostic laboratory testing, educational programs and resources, and research. with a focus on compassionate patient care and innovative…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity of Greenville County Sc Inc; the most unlike its peers is Piedmont Health Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

158 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 158 of the 218 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
51
Early backer (in before they grew)
151/158
Grantees still filing
107/158
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $1,020,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINAUNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC: $607,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INCSUSTAINING WAY: $483,500 · Other+116 more: $8,635,700 · Other+116 moreMILL VILLAGE MINISTRIES: $814,000 · Human ServicesMILL VILLAGE MINIST…ALLIANCE FOR THE COLLABORATION WITH THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY: $555,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE FOR THE CO…PENDLETON PLACE INC: $485,000 · Human ServicesPENDLETON PLACE INCURBAN LEAGUE OF THE UPSTATE: $310,000 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF THE…UPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION INC: $280,000 · Human ServicesUPSTATE WARRIOR SOL…NEIGHBORHOOD FOCUS: $218,500 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $180,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR INC: $180,000 · Human ServicesUPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS: $179,541 · Human Services+16 more: $1,169,851 · Human Services+16 moreRANDOLPH COLLEGE INC: $885,000 · EducationRANDOLPH COLLEG…PUBLIC EDUCATION PARTNERS GREENVILLE COUNTY: $544,900 · EducationPUBLIC EDUCATIO…GREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC: $467,650 · EducationGREENVILLE TECH…FURMAN UNIVERSITY: $246,112 · EducationFURMAN UNIVERSI…POE MILL ACHIEVEMENT CENTER: $225,000 · EducationPOE MILL ACHIEV…South Carolina Independent Colleges and Universities: $195,000 · EducationSouth Carolina …GREENVILLE LITERACY ASSOCIATION: $190,000 · EducationGREENVILLE LITE…UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $157,200 · EducationCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $123,790 · EducationFEED & SEED CO: $120,000 · Education+11 more: $319,875 · Education+11 morePrisma Health: $1,030,000 · HealthFACES & VOICES OF RECOVERY: $293,500 · HealthTAYLORS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $135,000 · HealthGATEWAY HOUSE INC: $100,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $70,000 · HealthUNITY HEALTH ON MAIN: $64,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC: $62,650 · Health+4 more: $102,500 · HealthGreenville Housing Fund: $663,650 · Housing & ShelterHOMES OF HOPE INC: $475,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITYWORKS INC: $245,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY SC INC: $157,000 · Housing & ShelterGenesis Homes Inc: $110,209 · Housing & ShelterSTEP BY STEP MINISTRY HOPE PROJECT INCORPORATED: $95,000 · Housing & ShelterLIVEWELL GREENVILLE: $500,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF MOMENTUM BIKE CLUBS: $237,000 · Youth DevelopmentMOSAIC EDUCATIONAL AND ARTS PROGRAM: $230,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTHBASE INC: $205,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirlUp GVL: $140,000 · Youth DevelopmentLEAD COLLECTIVE INCCHA: $127,000 · Youth DevelopmentInfinite Possibilities INC: $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN'S CANCER PARTNERS OF THE CAROLINAS INC: $60,000 · Youth Development+3 more: $102,500 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $840,000 · PhilanthropyABUNDANCE CAPITAL: $395,000 · PhilanthropyNEW MORNING: $90,000 · PhilanthropyCOASTAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC: $87,500 · PhilanthropySpartanburg County Foundation: $60,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $27,820 · Philanthropy
Other$10,746,200Human Services$4,371,892Education$3,474,527Health$1,857,650Housing & Shelter$1,745,859Youth Development$1,691,500Philanthropy$1,500,320

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPrisma Health: $1,030,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRANDOLPH COLLEGE INC: $885,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $840,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetMILL VILLAGE MINISTRIES: $814,000 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetGreenville Housing Fund: $663,650 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC: $607,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE COLLABORATION WITH THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY: $555,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetPUBLIC EDUCATION PARTNERS GREENVILLE COUNTY: $544,900 over 8y, 11% of budgetLIVEWELL GREENVILLE: $500,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetPENDLETON PLACE INC: $485,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetSUSTAINING WAY: $483,500 over 8y, 29% of budgetHOMES OF HOPE INC: $475,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetGREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC: $467,650 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetABUNDANCE CAPITAL: $395,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR CHILD SUCCESS INC: $355,000 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetUPSTATE FOREVER: $346,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetUNITED MINISTRIES: $333,500 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetROOT & REBOUND: $330,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF THE UPSTATE: $310,000 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetFACES & VOICES OF RECOVERY: $293,500 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetUPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION INC: $280,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetPRIDE LINK: $275,000 over 6y, 52% of budgetWOFFORD COLLEGE: $271,066 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFURMAN UNIVERSITY: $246,112 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITYWORKS INC: $245,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF MOMENTUM BIKE CLUBS: $237,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetMETROPOLITAN ARTS COUNCIL: $235,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetUNITED HOUSING CONNECTIONS: $235,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetMOSAIC EDUCATIONAL AND ARTS PROGRAM: $230,000 over 6y, 38% of budgetPOE MILL ACHIEVEMENT CENTER: $225,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD FOCUS: $218,500 over 6y, 12% of budgetYOUTHBASE INC: $205,000 over 8y, 17% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF GREENVILLE INC: $200,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSouth Carolina Independent Colleges and Universities: $195,000 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetGREENVILLE LITERACY ASSOCIATION: $190,000 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $180,000 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetSAFE HARBOR INC: $180,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetUPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS: $179,541 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $157,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY SC INC: $157,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetFACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPSTATE SC: $150,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetCONESTEE FOUNDATION INC: $149,850 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $143,271 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetGirlUp GVL: $140,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetFOSTERING GREAT IDEAS: $138,250 over 3y, 20% of budgetTAYLORS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $135,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetGREENVILLE CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS: $132,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetLEAD COLLECTIVE INCCHA: $127,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Prisma Health ↗
  • Who funds RANDOLPH COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds MILL VILLAGE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Greenville Housing Fund ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR THE COLLABORATION WITH THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC EDUCATION PARTNERS GREENVILLE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds LIVEWELL GREENVILLE ↗
  • Who funds PENDLETON PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINING WAY ↗
  • Who funds HOMES OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ABUNDANCE CAPITAL ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR CHILD SUCCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds UPSTATE FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ROOT & REBOUND ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF THE UPSTATE ↗
  • Who funds FACES & VOICES OF RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds UPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds PRIDE LINK ↗
  • Who funds WOFFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FURMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITYWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MOMENTUM BIKE CLUBS ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds UNITED HOUSING CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds MOSAIC EDUCATIONAL AND ARTS PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds POE MILL ACHIEVEMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD FOCUS ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHBASE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF GREENVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds South Carolina Independent Colleges and Universities ↗
  • Who funds GREENVILLE LITERACY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Scansource Charitable FoundationSC114.3× affinity54 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Scansource Charitable Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · United Way of Greenville County Inc · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · Hollingsworth Funds Inc · John I Smith Charities Inc · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina · United Community Bank Foundation · Sisk Foundation Buncombe St Methodist Church · Spartanburg County Foundation · Helga Marston Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jolley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jolley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    43report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 218 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jolley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph