Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Johnson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$435k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.3MEducation$812kHealth$514kPhilanthropy$370kArts & Culture$43kHuman Services$21kYouth Development$17kScience & Tech$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $400k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK$200,000
NYU LANGONE HEALTH$100,000
ALFRED E SMITH MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$50,000
PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY$50,000
MOUNT SINAI D RESEARCH FUND$10,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$10,000
ST JOSEPHS CHURCH$10,000
IWO JIMA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ASSN TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $5k → 17%ASSN TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $3k → 17%ASSN TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
NE
VA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 21 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
19

Total granted

$3.1M
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+55%

Still filing today

24%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PU
    PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $718k · revenue +51%
  • CO
    CITY OF PHILADELPHIA TRUSTEE ADMINISTERING WILLS EYE HOSPITAL
    3× · 2019–2021 · $20k · revenue +29%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $15k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI DERMATOLOGY RESEARCH FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
New York Institute of Technology

New york institute of technology (nyit) offers various degree programs, including undergraduate, graduate, and professional degrees, in more than 50 fields of study, including architecture and design; arts and sciences; (continued on…

Education
8
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
9
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
10
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lymphoma Research Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Priory of St Benedict Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK: $1,300,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORKALFRED E SMITH MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $365,000 · OtherALFRED E SMITH MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONNYU LANGONE HEALTH: $160,000 · OtherNYU LANGONE HEALTHNYU INSTITUTE FOR SURGICAL RESEARCH: $125,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $90,000 · Other+26 more: $362,900 · Other+26 morePEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $717,500 · EducationPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY+4 more: $17,500 · EducationCITY OF PHILADELPHIA TRUSTEE ADMINISTERING WILLS EYE HOSPITAL: $20,000 · HealthLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $3,600 · HealthPULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Health+2 more: $1,000 · HealthTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $15,000 · Arts & CultureIWO JIMA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$2,402,900Education$735,000Health$37,100Arts & Culture$20,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $717,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPRIORY OF ST BENEDICT INC: $22,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetCITY OF PHILADELPHIA TRUSTEE ADMINISTERING WILLS EYE HOSPITAL: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIGS & LITTLES NYC MENTORING INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNew York University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIWO JIMA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GARDINER FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPS 150 PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARY'S PLACE BY THE SEA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PRIORY OF ST BENEDICT INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF PHILADELPHIA TRUSTEE ADMINISTERING WILLS EYE HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds BIGS & LITTLES NYC MENTORING INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds IWO JIMA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds PULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GARDINER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Johnson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Johnson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Johnson’s filings →

More from the funding graph