Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Joel M Schreiber Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$58kEducation$53kHealth$9kInternational$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kPhilanthropy$650Human Services$410Arts & Culture$360Other$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$250
Median grant
4
States reached
$58k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA UNIVERSITY$10,360
BAIS MEDRASH OF WOODMERE$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,280
LINCOLN SQUARE SYNAGOGUE$4,360
Individual grant recipient$3,685
MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN$1,000
YOUNG ISRAEL OF THE WEST SIDE$500
HEBREW ACADEMY OF LONG BEACH$480
Individual grant recipient$360
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH$300
KHAL BAIS YITZCHOK D'SPINKA$250
CHABAD OF WEST HEMPSTEAD$200
SHOR YOSHUV INSTITUTE$180
YOUNG ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOOD FT LAUDERDALE$180
SHARSHERET$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $410) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BIKUR CHOLIM OF MIAMI BEACH: $360 → 15%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
NJ
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$159k · 29 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
33

Total granted

$159k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+35%

Still filing today

31%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationHealthInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YU
    YESHIVA UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +39%
  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $6k · revenue +89%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH
    6× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • RI
    RABBI ISAAC ELCHANAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +37%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • MS
    MAIMONIDES SHALOM ACADEMY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
University of Judaism Foundation
—
6
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
7
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
8
Ziv Israel Association
—
9
American Friends of Torat Eliyahu
Philanthropy
10
American Friends of Tzir Hemed
Philanthropy
11
Zichroin Rabbeini Meshilem Feiish Ztl Foundation
—
12
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rofeh Cholim Cancer Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Ora. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $25,960 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $21,795 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLINCOLN SQUARE SYNAGOGUE INC: $20,360 · OtherLINCOLN SQUARE SYNAGOGUE INCBAIS MEDRASH OF WOODMERE: $9,140 · OtherBAIS MEDRASH OF WOODMEREHEBREW ACADEMY OF LONG BEACH: $4,365 · Other+46 more: $22,730 · Other+46 moreYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $50,220 · EducationYESHIVA UNIVERSITYRABBI ISAAC ELCHANAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $3,600 · EducationRABBI ISAAC ELCHANAN THEOLOGICAL SE…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BET EL YESHIVA: $2,040 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $6,025 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH: $2,270 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $720 · International+1 more: $250 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BIALA YESHIVA INC: $2,000 · ReligionMAIMONIDES SHALOM ACADEMY INC: $1,080 · ReligionCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 · ReligionOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $400 · Religion+1 more: $100 · ReligionWest Side Hatzoloh: $1,600 · HealthSharsheret Inc: $540 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $350 · HealthJBI INTERNATIONAL INC: $300 · HealthROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyBIKUR CHOLIM OF MIAMI BEACH INC: $360 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50 · Human Services
Other$104,350Education$55,960International$9,265Religion$4,080Health$2,790Philanthropy$1,000Human Services$410

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $50,220 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $6,025 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRABBI ISAAC ELCHANAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH: $2,270 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BET EL YESHIVA: $2,040 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BIALA YESHIVA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWest Side Hatzoloh: $1,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAIMONIDES SHALOM ACADEMY INC: $1,080 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF MIAMI BEACH INC: $360 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJBI INTERNATIONAL INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRELIGIOUS ZIONISTS OF AMERICA MIZRACHI HAPOEL HAMIZRACHI INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORA: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChevrah Lomdei Mishnah Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLong Beach Mikveh Society Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds RABBI ISAAC ELCHANAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BET EL YESHIVA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BIALA YESHIVA INC ↗
  • Who funds West Side Hatzoloh ↗
  • Who funds MAIMONIDES SHALOM ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY25× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Fjc · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Lyons Family Foundation · Aviva & Marvin Sussman Foundation · Royal Heritage Foundation Inc · Terumah Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joel M Schreiber Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joel M Schreiber Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Joel M Schreiber Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Joel M Schreiber Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joel M Schreiber Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph