Skip to content
The Joe Torre Safe at Home Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The Joe Torre Safe at Home Foundation

Educating to end the cycle of domestic violence and save lives by providing violence intervention and prevention programs.

$801k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$338k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$4.3MCrime & Legal$48kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $338,413, the rows itemized in this filing. The $800,516 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $462,103 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$338,413
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES$338,413
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAFE HORIZON: $30k → 17%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $88k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK: $110k → 16%SAFE HORIZON: $18k → 17%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $85k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK: $102k → 16%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $85k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK: $100k → 16%THE HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE: $7k → 17%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $72k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK: $87k → 16%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $71k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK: $85k → 16%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $69k → 16%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $44k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 5 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$4.3M
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+32%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WJ
    WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +65%
  • YO
    YWCA of Greater Cincinnati
    7× · 2018–2024 · $515k · revenue +86%
  • CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCDIOCESE OF NEWARK
    5× · 2018–2022 · $484k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +32%
  • TP
    THE POSSIBILITY PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +1%
  • FUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Womens Resource Center of Newport and Bristol Counties

The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.

Human Services
2
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
3
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
4
New York City Alliance Against Sexual Assault Inc

The alliance leads new york citys mission to end sexual violence through education, prevention programming, research, and policy change. until we end sexual violence in all forms, we will be here for all survivors and the organizations…

Human Services
5
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services
6
The Center for Family Justice Inc

To break the cycle of abuse and violence - domestic, sexual and child by providing services that create hope, restore lives and drive social change through education and community collaboration

Human Services
7
Justice Innovation Inc

The center for justice innovation is a non-profit organization that works to create a fair, effective, and humane justice system and build strong, thriving communities.

Crime & Legal
8
Women Aware Inc

Women aware envisions a society where individuals can live free from violence and injustice. our mission is to promote the safety and self-sufficiency of individuals and families affected by domestic violence in middlesex county, new…

Human Services
9
New York City Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project

The new york city gay and lesbian anti-violence project (avp) mission is to empower lgbtq and hiv-affected communities and allies to end all forms of violence through organizing and education, and support survivors through counseling and…

—
10
A Place for Us Atlantic County Womens Center

To empower individuals and families by working to secure their physical safety, emotional well being, individual freedom, and economic equality.

—
11
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
12
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Horizon Inc; the most unlike its peers is Catholic Charities of the Arcdiocese of Newark. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $3,103,834 · HealthWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INCYWCA of Greater Cincinnati: $514,826 · Human ServicesYWCA of Greater CincinnatiCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCDIOCESE OF NEWARK: $483,828 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE A…SAFE HORIZON INC: $47,500 · Human Services+2 more: $16,500 · Human ServicesDominican Womens Development Center Inc: $125,617 · OtherFUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE: $9,541 · OtherTHE POSSIBILITY PROJECT INC: $9,620 · Crime & Legal
Health$3,103,834Human Services$1,062,654Other$135,158Crime & Legal$9,620

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $3,103,834 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetYWCA of Greater Cincinnati: $514,826 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCDIOCESE OF NEWARK: $483,828 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetDominican Womens Development Center Inc: $125,617 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC: $47,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE POSSIBILITY PROJECT INC: $9,620 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE: $9,541 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joe Torre Safe at Home Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joe Torre Safe at Home Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Catholic Charities of the Arcdiocese of Newark: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joe Torre Safe at Home’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home