Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Joe Torre Safe at Home Foundation

Educating to end the cycle of domestic violence and save lives by providing violence intervention and prevention programs.

$801k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$338k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$4.3MCrime & Legal$48kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $338,413 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $800,516 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $462,103 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$338,413
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES$338,413
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAFE HORIZON: $30k → 17%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $88k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK: $110k → 16%SAFE HORIZON: $18k → 17%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $85k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK: $102k → 16%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $85k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK: $100k → 16%THE HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE: $7k → 17%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $72k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK: $87k → 16%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $71k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK: $85k → 16%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $69k → 16%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $44k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.3M · 5 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$4.3M
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+32%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WJ
    WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +65%
  • YO
    YWCA of Greater Cincinnati
    7× · 2018–2024 · $515k · revenue +86%
  • CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCDIOCESE OF NEWARK
    5× · 2018–2022 · $484k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +32%
  • TP
    THE POSSIBILITY PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +1%
  • FUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Womens Resource Center of Newport and Bristol Counties

The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.

Human Services
2
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

3
New York City Alliance Against Sexual Assault Inc

The alliance leads new york citys mission to end sexual violence through education, prevention programming, research, and policy change. until we end sexual violence in all forms, we will be here for all survivors and the organizations…

Human Services
4
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
5
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services
6
Justice Innovation Inc

The center for justice innovation is a non-profit organization that works to create a fair, effective, and humane justice system and build strong, thriving communities.

Crime & Legal
7
The Center for Family Justice Inc

To break the cycle of abuse and violence - domestic, sexual and child by providing services that create hope, restore lives and drive social change through education and community collaboration

Human Services
8
New York City Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project

The new york city gay and lesbian anti-violence project (avp) mission is to empower lgbtq and hiv-affected communities and allies to end all forms of violence through organizing and education, and support survivors through counseling and…

9
Women Aware Inc

Women aware envisions a society where individuals can live free from violence and injustice. our mission is to promote the safety and self-sufficiency of individuals and families affected by domestic violence in middlesex county, new…

Human Services
10
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
11
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
12
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Horizon Inc and the most unlike its peers is Catholic Charities of the Arcdiocese of Newark. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $3,103,834 · HealthWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INCYWCA of Greater Cincinnati — $514,826 · Human ServicesYWCA of Greater CincinnatiCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCDIOCESE OF NEWARK — $483,828 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE A…SAFE HORIZON INC — $47,500 · Human Services+2 more — $16,500 · Human ServicesDominican Womens Development Center Inc — $125,617 · OtherFUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE — $9,541 · OtherTHE POSSIBILITY PROJECT INC — $9,620 · Crime & Legal
Health$3,103,834Human Services$1,062,654Other$135,158Crime & Legal$9,620

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $3,103,834 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetYWCA of Greater Cincinnati — $514,826 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCDIOCESE OF NEWARK — $483,828 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetDominican Womens Development Center Inc — $125,617 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC — $47,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE POSSIBILITY PROJECT INC — $9,620 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE — $9,541 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC — $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Joe Torre Safe at Home Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Catholic Charities of the Arcdiocese of Newark1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph