Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Joan W Rhame Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$500k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.6MHealth$90kYouth Development$50kEnvironment$40kPhilanthropy$27kHuman Services$20kEducation$10kScience & Tech$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Olana Partnership$500,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GOODWIN HOUSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%GOODWIN HOUSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC: $20k → 12%GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC: $20k → 12%GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
CT
CO
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 9 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$1.8M
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+35%

Still filing today

89%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    THE OLANA PARTNERSHIP
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +6%
  • GY
    GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $50k · revenue +56%
  • SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN NEW
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • PO
    PBS OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA WETA
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
5
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
6
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
10
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
11
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
12
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environment America Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Trustees of the Smith College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE OLANA PARTNERSHIP: $1,555,000 · Community ImprovementTHE OLANA PARTNERSHIPPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $30,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN NEW: $20,000 · OtherPBS OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA WETA: $20,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN TOP ARBORETUM INC: $20,000 · OtherPBS OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA: $10,000 · OtherVERO BEACH ART MUSEUM: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL: $10,000 · OtherGIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesGOODWIN HOUSE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC: $40,000 · HealthSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $26,500 · PhilanthropyENVIRONMENT AMERICA INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentMASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $5,000 · EnvironmentPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $10,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $10,000 · Education
Community Improvement$1,555,000Other$120,000Human Services$70,000Health$40,000Arts & Culture$30,000Philanthropy$26,500Environment$25,000Education$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE OLANA PARTNERSHIP: $1,555,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetGIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $26,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetGOODWIN HOUSE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetENVIRONMENT AMERICA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNTAIN TOP ARBORETUM INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The C K Williams Fdn Inv Adv AcctPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The C K Williams Fdn Inv Adv Acct · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joan W Rhame Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joan W Rhame Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Joan W Rhame Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Joan W Rhame Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joan W Rhame’s filings →

More from the funding graph