Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jo Melchor Hackney and John H Hackney Jr Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$198k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$396kHealth$190kYouth Development$70kEducation$53kScience & Tech$50kHuman Services$40kEnvironment$30kArts & Culture$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLD DOMINION ATHLETIC FOUNDATION$75,000
EVMS FOUNDATION$40,000
UVA HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,000
ELIZABETH RIVER FOUNDATION$10,000
NORFOLK BOTANICAL GARDENS$10,000
RAINBOW RIDERS$10,000
DOWNTOWN NORFOLK COUNCIL$5,000
CHESAPEAKE UNITED SOCCER CLUB$5,000
VIRGINIA BEACH HORSE SHOW ASSOCIATION$5,000
MERCY CHEFS$5,000
LITTLE THEATER OF NORFOLK$5,000
HURRAH PLAYERS$5,000
FIRST TEE HAMPTON ROADS$3,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH NORFOLK$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%MERCY CHEFS: $15k → 20%MERCY CHEFS: $5k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF EASTERN VIRGINIA: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 18% of The Jo Melchor Hackney and John H Hackney Jr Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 80%.

The Jo Melchor Hackney and John H Hackney Jr Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$937k · 14 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$937k
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+20%

Still filing today

43%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OD
    OLD DOMINION ATHLETIC FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $350k · revenue +13%
  • NB
    NORFOLK BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +9%
  • LT
    LITTLE THEATRE OF NORFOLK
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • AF
    ATO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • OA
    ODU ATHLETIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Medical Park Hospital Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
2
Carolina Medicorp Enterprises Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
3
Sentara Princess Anne Hospital

As part of sentara health's integrated health care system, we improve health every day.

Health
4
Mjh Foundation

Mjh foundation provides investment and management services for martha jefferson hospital, a non-profit organization which provides healthcare to the community.

Health
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
Sentara Health

We improve health every day through coordinating, promoting and planning for the provision of health services and the promotion of health, medical education, and the social, cultural, educational, and economic development of the community.

Health
7
Halifax Regional Hospital Inc

As part of sentara health's integrated health care system, we improve health every day.

Health
8
Sentara Medical Group

See schedule o.as part of sentara health's integrated health care system, we improve health every day through the establishment and operation of programs and services for the provision of health care and for health related purposes; the…

Health
9
Martha Jefferson Hospital

As part of sentara health's integrated delivery system, we improve health every day.

Health
10
Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters

Dedicated to the mission of providing the best possible care and services for all children who come to us because of sickness and injury.

Health
11
Presbyterian Medical Care Corp

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
12
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Norfolk Botanical Garden Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OLD DOMINION ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $350,000 · OtherOLD DOMINION ATHLETIC FOUNDATIONEVMS FOUNDATION: $195,000 · OtherEVMS FOUNDATIONUVA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $185,000 · OtherUVA HEALTH FOUNDATIONRAINBOW RIDERS: $70,000 · OtherRAINBOW RIDERSATO FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Other+10 more: $92,250 · Other+10 moreNORFOLK BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentMERCY CHEFS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF EASTERN VIRGINIA: $5,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE THEATRE OF NORFOLK: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HURRAH PLAYERS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 · ReligionChesapeake United Soccer Club Inc: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $2,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,500 · HealthNORFOLK TOURISM FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Education
Other$942,250Environment$30,000Human Services$25,000Arts & Culture$20,000Religion$15,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Health$5,000Education$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOLD DOMINION ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetNORFOLK BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMERCY CHEFS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE THEATRE OF NORFOLK: $10,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetChesapeake United Soccer Club Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE HURRAH PLAYERS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF EASTERN VIRGINIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORFOLK TOURISM FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OLD DOMINION ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORFOLK BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY CHEFS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE THEATRE OF NORFOLK ↗
  • Who funds Chesapeake United Soccer Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HURRAH PLAYERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF EASTERN VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds NORFOLK TOURISM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hampton Roads Community FoundationVA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hampton Roads Community Foundation · Townebank Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jo Melchor Hackney and John H Hackney Jr Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jo Melchor Hackney and John H Hackney Jr Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jo Melchor Hackney and John H Hackney Jr Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Jo Melchor Hackney and John H Hackney Jr Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jo Melchor Hackney and John H Hackney Jr Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph