Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Jesus Fund Foundation Inc

To support those individuals and organizations who lift up jesus in word and deed; including teaching his principles and furthering the gospel of jesus, caring for the underprivileged and facilitating opportunities for all people to know and follow jesusto support those individuals and organizations who lift up jesus in word and deed…

$225k
Granted FY2018
10
Grants FY2018
7
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of The Jesus Fund Foundation Inc’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year The Jesus Fund Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $225k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
17
10
18
1
21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Religion$150kHousing & Shelter$115kCivil Rights$100kInternational$65kHuman Services$50kPhilanthropy$40kCrime & Legal$20kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2018 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$9k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$50,000
OUR HOUSE$50,000
HELPING HANDS MINISTRIES$40,000
ARKANSAS DREAM CENTER$25,000
HOPE INTERNATIONAL$20,000
AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY$15,000
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE$10,000
LEAD LIKE JESUS$5,000
ALLIANCE FOR SCHOOL CHOICE$5,000
CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ARKANSAS DREAM CENTER: $25k → 17%HELPING HANDS MINISTRIES: $40k → 13%ARKANSAS DREAM CENTER: $25k → 17%HELPING HANDS MINISTRIES: $40k → 13%HELPING HANDS MINISTRIES: $40k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

PA
VA
MD
AZ
AR
SC
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of The Jesus Fund Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Jesus Fund Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$505k · 10 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down. Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$505k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+128%
+163%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21
Human ServicesCivil RightsInternationalReligionEducationPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $120k · revenue +103%
  • OH
    OUR HOUSE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $115k · revenue +128%
  • ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • WR
    WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +163%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

4
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
5
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
6
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
7
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

8
National Christian Foundation -- Wisconsin Inc

Equipping followers of christ to give wisely to advance his kingdom by inspiring biblical stewardship and generosity.

Religion
9
Biblica Inc

To provide the bible in accurate, contemporary translations and formats so that more people around the world will have the opportunity to be transformed by jesus christ.

Religion
10
Across Nations

Across nations is dedicated to spreading the gospel through establishing, developing and promoting all aspects of church ministry.

Religion
11
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
12
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alliance Defending Freedom and the most unlike its peers is American Bible Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC — $120,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INCEVERY ARKANSAN INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesEVERY ARKANSAN INCOUR HOUSE INC — $115,000 · OtherOUR HOUSE INCCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS — $10,000 · OtherCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER …ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $100,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE DEFENDING FREE…INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE — $20,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICEHOPE INTERNATIONAL — $40,000 · InternationalHOPE INTERNA…WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $25,000 · InternationalWORLD RELIEF…NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $40,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY — $30,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN GROWTH FUND INC — $10,000 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR FAITHWALK LEADERSHIP — $10,000 · Public Benefit
Human Services$170,000Other$125,000Civil Rights$120,000International$65,000Philanthropy$40,000Religion$30,000Education$10,000Public Benefit$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC — $120,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC — $115,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEVERY ARKANSAN INC — $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN GROWTH FUND INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR FAITHWALK LEADERSHIP — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS — $10,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Jesus Fund Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jesus Fund Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Jesus Fund Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph