Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ciancia Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$380k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of THE CIANCIA FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $242k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$7,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HACKENSACK HOSPITAL$70,000
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$31,000
ELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL$26,000
VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
HOLY NAME FOUNDATION$25,000
CHOP FOUNDATION$20,000
COVENANT HOUSE$20,000
HMH FOUNDATION$20,000
EH FOUNDATION$20,000
MSK GIVING$15,000
HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
ST Jude Children Hospital$10,000
CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY$10,000
ENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL$10,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CENTER$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GOODWILL RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 16%GOODWILL RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 16%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $10k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $10k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $10k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $10k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $6k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $5k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $1k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $1k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
MN
NY
PA
NJ
CA
VA
NC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 31 repeat orgs$126k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
16

Total granted

$2.8M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+10%

Still filing today

42%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HN
    HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $573k · revenue +50%
  • FU
    Fordham University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $351k · revenue +47%
  • TV
    THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $153k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • B
    BERGENPAC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • CF
    CALVARY FUND INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +14%
  • TT
    TABLE TO TABLE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

2
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

3
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine

A medical school dedicated to excellence in the tripartite academic medical missions of education, scientific research, and clinical care.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Nj State Firefighters Mutual Benevolent Assoc Inc

It is the mission of the new jersey firefighters mutual benevolent association to represent, protect, and educate the firefighters, emts, and dispatchers throughout the state of new jersey through representation at the local, state, and…

7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
9
Jfk Medical Associates Pa

Jfk medical associates, p.a. is committed to excellence in providing quality and compassionate healthcare services to diverse communities.

Health
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University and the most unlike its peers is Manasquan Hook and Ladder Co No 1. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 80 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr18%27%20–35yr14%18%35–55yr11%55%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr18%1%20–35yr14%13%35–55yr11%86%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
12%
6,333/52,269

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST Jude Children Hospital — $280,500 · OtherST Jude Children HospitalHACKENSACK HOSPITAL — $239,500 · OtherHACKENSACK HOSPITALENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL — $205,000 · OtherENGLEWOOD HOSPITALSLOAN KATTERING CANCER CENTER — $180,500 · OtherSLOAN KATTERING CANCER CENTERBERGEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $112,850 · OtherBERGEN COMMUNITY COLLEGEAMERICAN RED CROSS — $99,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY NY — $80,000 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE — $79,500 · OtherCHOP FOUNDATION — $55,000 · Other+32 more — $263,325 · Other+32 moreHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC — $573,000 · HealthHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INCTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $152,500 · HealthTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATI…+3 more — $11,000 · HealthFordham University — $351,000 · EducationFordham UniversityBLAIR ACADEMY — $69,500 · EducationBLAIR ACADEMYELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INC — $62,000 · EducationELISABETH MORROW SC…+2 more — $13,500 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY — $54,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesEVA'S VILLAGE INC — $12,500 · Community ImprovementCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $9,000 · Food & NutritionTABLE TO TABLE INC — $2,510 · Food & NutritionNEW JERSEY FORESTRY ASSOCIATION INC — $2,000 · EnvironmentHACKENSACK RIVERKEEPER INC — $500 · EnvironmentMANASQUAN HOOK AND LADDER CO NO 1 — $500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$1,595,175Health$736,500Education$496,000Human Services$55,000Community Improvement$12,500Food & Nutrition$11,510Environment$2,500Public Safety & Disaster$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC — $573,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University — $351,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $152,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetBLAIR ACADEMY — $69,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INC — $62,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY — $54,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEVA'S VILLAGE INC — $12,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALVARY FUND INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTABLE TO TABLE INC — $2,510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY FORESTRY ASSOCIATION INC — $2,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGoodwill Rescue Mission Inc — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHACKENSACK RIVERKEEPER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEONIA SPORTS BOOSTERS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEVERGREEN FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMANASQUAN HOOK AND LADDER CO NO 1 — $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds Fordham University
  • Who funds THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BLAIR ACADEMY
  • Who funds ELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY
  • Who funds EVA'S VILLAGE INC
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CALVARY FUND INC
  • Who funds TABLE TO TABLE INC
  • Who funds THE NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ciancia Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Eva's Village Inc19% of income from government
  • Holy Name Medical Center Inc1% of income from government
  • Hackensack Riverkeeper Inc0% of income from government
  • Blair Academy0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph