· Public charity
The Jeffrey Modell Foundation Inc
The Foundation is dedicated to the early diagnosis, treatment and ultimate cure of Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 29 grants below total $1,149,762 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,165,862 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,016,100 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k24 grants · $626k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $524k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $181,000 |
| NEW YORK UNIVERSITY | $155,000 |
| BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $75,000 |
| UCLA MEDICAL SCIENCE DEV | $62,500 |
| TEXAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $47,162 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $41,800 |
| CHILDRENS HOSP-PHILADELPHIA | $35,000 |
| CLINIC FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN | $33,000 |
| MEDICAL UNIV- SOUTH CAROLINA | $25,000 |
| ALL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $25,000 |
| CHILDRENS NATL MEDICAL CTR | $25,000 |
| MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI ADV | $25,000 |
| REGENTS OF UC IRVINE | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $1.0M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 20 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Stated purpose: DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Stated purpose: DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Stated purpose: DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Stated purpose: DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Stated purpose: DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Stated purpose: DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Stated purpose: DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Stated purpose: DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHChildren's Hospital Corporation8× · 2017–2024 · $538k · revenue +69%
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA6× · 2018–2024 · $413k · revenue +72%
- BCBaylor College of Medicine7× · 2017–2023 · $367k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- TCTHE CHILDRENS HOSP OF PHILADone grant, 2019 · $100k
- UOUNIV OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDone grant, 2018 · $25k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.
Education, research, medical services and other public services.
Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…
Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…
Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…
The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…
University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…
The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)
Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…
Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.
We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Children's Hospital and the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S NATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado ↗
- Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds University of Michigan ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Jeffrey Modell Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.