Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Jeffrey Farber Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$497k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Philanthropy$2.5MReligion$2.0MEducation$469kHealth$31kFood & Nutrition$20kHousing & Shelter$15kAnimals$8kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $194k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METR$250,000
ORT AMERICA$194,250
Individual grant recipient$10,000
EMPOWERMENT PLAN$10,000
SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB$10,000
MCF$5,000
NOTTINGHAM NATURE NOOK$5,000
HIGHER HOPES$5,000
GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD B$5,000
ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $3k → 6%HIGHER HOPES: $5k → 8%EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $10k → 21%EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $5k → 21%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $1k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 4 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$2.7M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+40%

Still filing today

75%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $293k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsEducationFood & NutritionReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FED OF METRO DETROIT
    2× · 2018–2019 · $2.2M
  • OA
    ORT AMERICA INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $444k · revenue -33%
  • KIDS KICKING CANCER INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH FOUND OF METRO DETRO
    one grant, 2017 · $1.9M
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +130%
  • GC
    GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hillel of Metropolitan Detroit

Inspire students to be active in jewish life.

Education
2
Michigan Israel Business Accelerator Foundation

Mibaf has adopted a mission to advance michigan's innovation ecosystem, one israeli connection at a time.

Community Improvement
3
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

4
Michigan B'nai B'rith Hillel Foundation Inc

Provides religious cultural and social services to students at the university of michigan

5
Hebrew Free Loan Association

The association provides financial assistance to jewish people in the state of michigan through the lending of money without interest in accordance with core jewish values, respect, compassion, and confidentiality.

Philanthropy
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

7
Michigan Israel Business Accelerator

Accelerating michigan's economic growth, one israeli innovation at a time.

Community Improvement
8
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
9
Gesher Human Services

Gesher human services is a bridge to hope and opportunity for people at work, at home, and in the community. gesher's workforce development, behavioral health, and inclusion programming serves all metro detroiters while meeting the needs…

Employment
10
Ben and Esther Rosenbloom Hillel Center for Jewish Life At University of Md

Enhance the lives of jewish students as that they may enrich the jewish people and the world. hillel actively seeks to engage jewish students on their own terms, to provide them with opportunities to participate in jewish life.

11
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
12
Jfa Non-Profit Housing Corporation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 826 Michigan Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FED OF METRO DETROIT — $2,196,116 · OtherJEWISH FED OF METRO DETROITUNITED JEWISH FOUND OF METRO DETRO — $1,945,730 · OtherUNITED JEWISH FOUND OF METRO DETROORT AMERICA INC — $444,250 · OtherORT AMERICA INCJEWISH FEDERATION OF METR — $250,000 · Other+5 more — $30,000 · OtherKIDS KICKING CANCER INC — $20,000 · HealthRehabilitation Institute of Chicago — $10,000 · HealthTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN — $15,000 · Human ServicesHIGHER HOPES — $5,000 · Human ServicesCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN — $3,000 · Human ServicesISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $2,500 · Human ServicesHospice of Michigan Inc — $1,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $10,000 · Food & NutritionCONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL — $5,000 · ReligionNOTTINGHAM NATURE NOOK — $5,000 · Animals
Other$4,866,096Health$30,000Human Services$26,500Education$20,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Religion$5,000Animals$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetORT AMERICA INC — $444,250 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS KICKING CANCER INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN — $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget826 MICHIGAN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHIGHER HOPES — $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNOTTINGHAM NATURE NOOK — $5,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHospice of Michigan Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jk Farber Family FoundationMI15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jk Farber Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Jeffrey Farber Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Jeffrey Farber Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Jeffrey Farber Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph