Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jeanne and William Barulich Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$976k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$2.5MEducation$1.1MRecreation & Sports$125kHuman Services$50kPhilanthropy$23k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $225k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $260k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.5M
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEMARILLAC ACADEMY$975,930
GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION$500,024
SAINT IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREPARATORY$200,000
PARTNERS IN SCHOOL INNOVATION$60,000
RUSSIAN HILL SCHOOL$35,000
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY$30,000
GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION$30,000
FIRST GRADUATE$30,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES' CYO ATHELTICS$25,000
SAINT IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREPARATORY - FATHER SAUER ACADEMY$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO$20,000
ST HELENA PRESCHOOL FOR ALL$15,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE - BAY AREA$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $30k → 10%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $25k → 10%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $25k → 10%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $25k → 10%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $25k → 10%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $25k → 10%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $25k → 10%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $25k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO: $25k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO: $25k → 10%GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $500k → 10%GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 15 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$3.7M
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+17%

Still filing today

47%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FG
    FIRST GRADUATE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $215k · revenue +18%
  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $205k · revenue +43%
  • EC
    EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $160k · revenue +205%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE
    one grant, 2017 · $23k · revenue +17%
  • SF
    SAINT FRANCIS CENTER - SISTER CHRISTINA FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • RH
    RIODAN HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco High School of the Arts

San Francisco Arts and Science Academy (ASA) provides TK5 grade students with a strong foundation in the arts, language, math, and science, fostering creativity, curiosity, and character development. Our bilingual, hands-on curriculum…

Education
2
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—
3
Silicon Valley Education Foundation

Who we are - silicon valley education foundation (svef) focuses on raising student performance in the critical areas of math and science across all 33 santa clara county school districts, and also adjoining san mateo and alameda counties.…

Community Improvement
4
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
5
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
6
Achievekids

Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and…

Education
7
Foundation for a College Education

Fce's mission is to increase the number of first-generation, low-income students of color from east palo alto, ca and surrounding communities who graduate with a degree from a four-year college or university. fce was founded out of a…

Education
8
Ghs Academy Golden Hills School

Ghs provides an enriched educational environment that fosters a culture of integrity, respect and service to others. with high standards in academics and character development, ghs prepares students to be confident and successful global…

Education
9
Urban School of San Francisco

The urban school of san francisco seeks to ignite a passion for learning, inspiring its students to become self-motivated, enthusiastic participants in their education - both in high school and beyond.

Education
10
Parents for Public Schools of San Francisco

PPS-SF's mission is to promote the fundamental value of public education and pursue the success of every public school by sharing knowledge, bridging communities, and informing policy.

—
11
The School for Global Thinkers

Our mission is to challenge and nurture young women to thrive in future global markets through personalized STEM advanced academics. Through a supportive small school and single-gender environment, project-based learning, and STEM advanced…

Education
12
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Graduate; the most unlike its peers is St Helena Preschool for All Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DEMARILLAC ACADEMY: $1,135,930 · OtherDEMARILLAC ACADEMYIGNATIAN CORPORATION SAINT IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL: $400,000 · OtherIGNATIAN CORPORATION SAINT IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOLCATHOLIC CHARITIES' CYO ATHELTICS: $125,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES' CYO ATHELTICSBOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $75,000 · OtherJANET POMEROY RECREATION AND REHABILITATION CENTER: $65,500 · Other+6 more: $130,000 · Other+6 moreGOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $770,024 · Human ServicesGOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATIONGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $205,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA …CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $50,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN SCHOOL INNOVATION: $385,000 · PhilanthropyPARTNERS IN …FOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE: $23,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION F…EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $160,000 · EducationRUSSIAN HILL SCHOOL: $50,000 · EducationUniversity of San Francisco: $20,000 · EducationSt Helena Preschool For All Inc: $15,000 · EducationFIRST GRADUATE: $215,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,931,430Human Services$1,025,024Philanthropy$408,000Education$245,000Youth Development$215,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $770,024 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN SCHOOL INNOVATION: $385,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetFIRST GRADUATE: $215,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $205,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $160,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $75,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetRUSSIAN HILL SCHOOL: $50,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE: $23,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Helena Preschool For All Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN SCHOOL INNOVATION ↗
  • Who funds FIRST GRADUATE ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds RUSSIAN HILL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE ↗
  • Who funds University of San Francisco ↗
  • Who funds St Helena Preschool For All Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jeanne and William Barulich Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jeanne and William Barulich Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jeanne and William Barulich Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph