Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jdj Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$246kHealth$82kYouth Development$17kArts & Culture$16kRecreation & Sports$8k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$963k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$20,000
NEW YORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY$12,750
VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY$5,000
ANN'S PLACE$5,000
SQUASH HAVEN$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%ANN'S PLACE: $5k → 9%SQUASH HAVEN: $3k → 12%ANN'S PLACE: $5k → 9%SQUASH HAVEN: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$228k · 8 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against -29% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$228k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
-29%

Still filing today

75%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $98k · revenue +50%
  • BS
    BRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $16k · revenue +69%
  • CS
    City Squash Inc
    5× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PETER'S UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • CT
    CARON TREATMENT CENTERS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
3
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
4
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

—
5
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
6
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
7
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
8
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
9
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
10
Monmouth University Inc

See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…

Education
11
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
12
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brunswick School Inc; the most unlike its peers is New York Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $98,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $71,650 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIABRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC: $16,000 · EducationBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INCMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $55,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERINGYALE UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYST PETER'S UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherST PETER'S UNIVERSITYCARON TREATMENT CENTERS: $10,000 · OtherCARON TREATMENT CENTERSYALE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYUS SQUASH: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $7,315 · OtherNew York Historical Society: $12,750 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $2,784 · Arts & CultureANNS PLACE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSQUASH HAVEN INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesCity Squash Inc: $12,675 · Recreation & SportsSQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $500 · Recreation & SportsTHE ORPHAN DISEASE PATHWAY PROJECT: $2,500 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $380 · Health
Education$185,650Other$137,315Arts & Culture$15,534Human Services$14,000Recreation & Sports$13,175Health$2,880

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $98,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $71,650 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNew York Historical Society: $12,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCity Squash Inc: $12,675 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetANNS PLACE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSQUASH HAVEN INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $2,784 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ORPHAN DISEASE PATHWAY PROJECT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $380 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds BRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds New York Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds City Squash Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANNS PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds SQUASH HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ORPHAN DISEASE PATHWAY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jdj Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jdj Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Squash Haven Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jdj’s filings →

More from the funding graph