Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James Billings Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$49k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$110kEducation$89kHealth$32kFood & Nutrition$10kArts & Culture$950Philanthropy$250Other$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$93k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SMH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$27,000
FANDANGO SANCTUARY INC$16,000
SPCA$3,000
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$1,500
WATERFORD SCHOOL$1,000
HUMANE SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BE THE CHANGE: $250 → 8%ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK: $4k → 9%WATERFORD SCHOOL: $1k → 13%JOE DI MAGGIO HOSPITAL: $5k → 13%SPCA FLORIDA: $4k → 16%THE WATERFORD SCHOOL: $3k → 8%CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%SUPPORTERS OF SUMMIT INC: $2k → 12%ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK: $3k → 9%WATERFORD SCHOOL: $1k → 13%SPCA FLORIDA: $4k → 16%THE WATERFORD SCHOOL: $3k → 8%CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK: $2k → 9%SPCA: $3k → 16%THE WATERFORD SCHOOL: $2k → 8%CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK: $2k → 9%SPCA FLORIDA: $1k → 16%THE WATERFORD SCHOOL: $2k → 8%CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $5k → 9%SPCA: $1k → 16%THE WATERFORD SCHOOL: $2k → 8%CAT DEPOT: $1k → 9%SPCA FLORIDA: $1k → 16%WILDLIFE CENTER OF VENICE: $250 → 9%SPCA: $1k → 16%SMH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $27k → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SARASOTA COUNTY INC: $1k → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SARASOTA COUNTY INC: $300 → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SARASOTA COUNTY INC: $250 → 9%ROYAL PET RESCUE: $250 → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SARASOTA COUNTY INC: $250 → 9%BE THE CHANGE: $2k → 9%BE THE CHANGE: $2k → 9%BE THE CHANGE: $2k → 9%BE THE CHANGE: $2k → 9%BE THE CHANGE: $1k → 9%FANDANGO SANCTUARY INC: $25k → 9%FANDANGO SANCTUARY INC: $18k → 9%FANDANGO SANCTUARY INC: $16k → 9%FANDANGO SANCTUARY INC: $13k → 9%FANDANGO SANCTUARY INC: $8k → 9%FANDANGO SANCTUARY INC: $2k → 9%VINTAGE PAWS: $300 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$204k · 13 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$204k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+156%

Still filing today

62%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FANDANGO SANCTUARY INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $81k · revenue ×22 · 79% of their budget
  • Cornell University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $64k · revenue +59%
  • SI
    SPCA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $15k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • RC
    RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +43%
  • JD
    JOE DI MAGGIO HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • SO
    SUPPORTERS OF SUMMIT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +237%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
2
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
3
Saving Saluda Strays
Animals
4
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
5
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
6
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
7
Spca San Pat County

The goal of the SPCA San Pat County is to maintain an animal shelter that serves the needs of the county. It serves the county and communities within that county by providing a shelter where people can adopt a homeless pet and as long as…

Animals
8
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
9
Jacksonville Humane Society Inc

The jacksonville humane society provides care, comfort and compassion to animals in need while engaging the hearts, hands and minds of our community to bring about an end to the killing of abandoned and orphaned shelter animals.

Animals
10
Street Cat Clinic

Improve the veterinary care of outdoor cats in se florida via spay/neuter

Animals
11
First State Animal Center and Spca Inc

Our mission is to prevent cruelty and suffering to animals, rescue the trapped or injured, provide emergency medical treatment and temporary housing to the homeless animals, and to reduce pet overpopulation through various spay/neuter and…

Animals
12
Cats Alive

Cats alive reduces preventable cat deaths and overpopulation by providing spay-neuter surgeries, vaccinations and other life-saving medical treatments for outdoor cats and kittens in the underserved rural community of fort white, florida.…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spca Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fandango Sanctuary Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
12/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FANDANGO SANCTUARY INC: $80,500 · AnimalsFANDANGO SANCTUARY INCSPCA INC: $15,000 · AnimalsSPCA INCBE THE CHANGE INC: $9,000 · AnimalsBE THE CHANGE INC+3 more: $3,300 · AnimalsCornell University: $64,000 · EducationCornell UniversityRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC: $5,000 · EducationRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESI…+1 more: $1,500 · EducationSMH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $27,000 · OtherSMH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONTHE WATERFORD SCHOOL: $11,500 · OtherTHE WATERFORD SCHOOLCHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $7,000 · OtherCHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUN…JOE DI MAGGIO HOSPITAL: $5,000 · OtherJOE DI MAGGIO HOSPITAL+6 more: $4,700 · Other+6 moreALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $9,500 · Food & NutritionART CENTER SARASOTA INC: $950 · Arts & Culture
Animals$107,800Education$70,500Other$55,200Food & Nutrition$9,500Arts & Culture$950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFANDANGO SANCTUARY INC: $80,500 over 6y, 79% of budgetCornell University: $64,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA INC: $15,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBE THE CHANGE INC: $9,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetCHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Sarasota County Inc: $2,050 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSUPPORTERS OF SUMMIT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetART CENTER SARASOTA INC: $950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CENTER OF VENICE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FANDANGO SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds SPCA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BE THE CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Sarasota County Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUPPORTERS OF SUMMIT INC ↗
  • Who funds CAT DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds ART CENTER SARASOTA INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CENTER OF VENICE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co IncFL17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James Billings Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James Billings Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Spca Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Cat Depot: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The James Billings Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The James Billings Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James Billings’ filings →

More from the funding graph