· Private foundation
The James and Robin Coogan Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k69 grants · $148k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MT ST MICHAEL ACADEMY | $25,000 |
| CLEVELAND CLINIC MARTIN HEALTH BARSTOW REED SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY | $10,000 |
| GRACEWAY VILLAGE | $10,000 |
| WHITE PLAINS HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| MARY THERESE ROSE FUND | $8,000 |
| WESTERLY HOSPITAL | $6,000 |
| CONVENANT HOUSE | $6,000 |
| TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK | $6,000 |
| SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR FUND | $5,500 |
| HARBOUR RIDGE FAMILY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| FOUNDATION OF WMCHEALTH (MARIA FARERI) | $5,000 |
| CANCER SUPPORT TEAM | $5,000 |
| SAINT MARYS CHURCH | $5,000 |
| RHODE ISLAND CENTER | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $159k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
91 repeat relationships — 52 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GWGRACE WAY VILLAGE INC7× · 2019–2025 · $83k · revenue +103%
- WPWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center9× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +98%
- CSCANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- GEGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION (MAUI FIRES)one grant, 2023 · $5k
- PHPACIFIC HOUSE INCone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -16%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Incone grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.
The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
As a new york city based nonprofit, we're dedicated to transforming the health and well-being of our communities through inclusive and accessible running experiences, empowering all to achieve their potential.
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jessica Humphrey Private Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
101 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 101 of the 191 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GRACE WAY VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds White Plains Hospital Medical Center ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds OCEAN COMMUNITY YMCA ↗
- Who funds THE MARY THERESE ROSE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE JONNYCAKE CENTER OF WESTERLY INC ↗
- Who funds Harbour Ridge Family Foundation ↗
- Who funds WESTERLY AREA REST MEALS (WARM) INC ↗
- Who funds RI CENTER ASSISTING THOSE IN NEED ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF ST LUCIE & OKEECHOBEE INC ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE RURAL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAFESPACE INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds GREYSTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Washington Trust Co Charitable Fdn · United Way of Rhode Island Inc · Mutual of America Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Ashaway Charitable Trust · Forrest C & Frances H Lattner Foundation · The Community Foundation - Martin / St Lucie Inc · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · Mbia Foundation · United Way of Westchester and Putnam · Field Hall Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The James and Robin Coogan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Pacific House Inc — 46% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Safespace Inc — 25% of income from government
- Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Palm Beach Inc — 12% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Hope Rural School Inc — 6% of income from government
- Florida Sheriffs Association Inc — 4% of income from government
- Grace Way Village Inc — 4% of income from government
- The New England Center for Children Inc — 3% of income from government
- Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
- Greenwich Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.