Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James and Kimberly Currie Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$149k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$211kFood & Nutrition$173kScience & Tech$160kYouth Development$127kHuman Services$100kRecreation & Sports$62kPublic Benefit$20kHealth$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $134k
$12,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE MUSEUM$25,000
THE SOO LOCKS CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$20,000
GRAND MARAIS HISTORICAL SOC INC$15,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MARQUETTE CO$15,000
FEEDING AMERICA WEST MI FOOD BANK$15,000
LANSING FOOD BANK$12,500
HIGHFIELDS INC$11,150
UPPER PENINSULA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$10,000
MARY FREE BED HOSPITAL AND REHAB$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LANSING$7,500
GIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN$5,000
SCOUTING OF AMERICA CROSSROADS CNCIL$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MIDLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The James and Kimberly Currie Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 94%.

The James and Kimberly Currie Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$822k · 16 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$822k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
0%

Still filing today

50%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • I5
    IMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER
    5× · 2017–2021 · $105k · revenue +61%
  • HI
    HIGHFIELDS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $78k · revenue +1%
  • SL
    SOO LOCKS CHILDRENS MUSEUM
    5× · 2021–2025 · $73k · revenue ×68

Funded once

  • BT
    BURT TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • MF
    MARY FREE BED HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • MC
    MIDLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Flint Children's Museum

To inspire a love for learning in science, technology, engineering, math, and art, and awaken imagination through hands-on play.

Arts & Culture
2
Great Lakes Museum of Science Environment and Technology

Our mission is to make science, technology, engineering, and math (stem) come alive, and our vision is a community where all people value stem to inform decision making and enrich lives. (continued on schedule o)guiding principles: we help…

Science & Tech
3
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
4
Michigan Legacy Art Park

Inspire awareness, appreciation and passion for michigan's history and stories, culture and environment through the arts.

Arts & Culture
5
Grand Rapids Children's Museum

Provides a hands-on environment that celebrates childhood, inspires learning and encourages self-directed exploration for children.

Arts & Culture
6
Mount Pleasant Discovery Museum

To enhance the community by inspiring creativity, learning and curiosity.

Arts & Culture
7
Lincoln Children's Museum

The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.

Arts & Culture
8
The Childrens Museum of Siouxland Inc

Provide an interactive learning environment for children to foster imagination and creativity while inspiring life-long learning

Arts & Culture
9
Boys & Girls Club of Greater Holland

Programs for local youth

Youth Development
10
Montessori Childrens House of Lenawee Inc

Education of young people in the Montessori method

Human Services
11
Great Lakes Center for the Arts

The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
12
Lansing Art Gallery & Education Center

The lansing art gallery & education center provides public awareness, education and enjoyment of the visual arts by promoting the work of michigan artists.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ele's Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hosanna House of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE MUSEUM: $100,000 · OtherIMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE MUSEUMHIGHFIELDS INC: $78,150 · OtherHIGHFIELDS INCFEEDING AMERICA WEST MI FOOD BANK: $69,500 · OtherFEEDING AMERICA WEST MI FOOD BANKCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MARQUETTE CO: $60,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MARQUETTE COLANSING FOOD BANK: $43,000 · OtherLANSING FOOD BANKLUCE COUNTY COMM RESOURCE & REC CTR: $31,500 · OtherLUCE COUNTY COMM RESOURCE & REC CTRMARY FREE BED HOSPITAL AND REHAB: $27,000 · OtherMARY FREE BED HOSPITAL AND REHABFEEDING AMERICA WEST FOOD BANK: $20,000 · OtherGRAND MARAIS HISTORICAL SOC INC: $20,000 · Other+9 more: $52,000 · Other+9 moreIMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER: $105,000 · Arts & CultureIMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTERSOO LOCKS CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $73,000 · Arts & CultureSOO LOCKS CHILDRENS MUSEUMUPPER PENINSULA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INCORPORATED: $62,500 · Arts & CultureUPPER PENINSULA CHILDREN'S MUSE…+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LANSING: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GI…GIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN: $22,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS…ELE'S PLACE INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentELE'S PLACE…GREATER LANSING FOOD BANK: $40,000 · Food & NutritionMIDLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$501,150Arts & Culture$245,500Youth Development$92,000Food & Nutrition$40,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER: $105,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetHIGHFIELDS INC: $78,150 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSOO LOCKS CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $73,000 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetUPPER PENINSULA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INCORPORATED: $62,500 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LANSING: $50,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN: $22,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMIDLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PURPLE ROSE THEATRE COMPANY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HIGHFIELDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOO LOCKS CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds UPPER PENINSULA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LANSING ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LANSING FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds HOSANNA HOUSE OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds THE PURPLE ROSE THEATRE COMPANY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Joe D Pentecost FoundationMI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Joe D Pentecost Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Jackson Charitable Foundation Inc · Capital Region Community Foundation · Midland Area Community Foundation · Dart Foundation fka Solid Waste Management Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James and Kimberly Currie Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James and Kimberly Currie Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The James and Kimberly Currie Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The James and Kimberly Currie Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James and Kimberly Currie’s filings →

    More from the funding graph