Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jacobs Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$63kFood & Nutrition$38kReligion$38kHuman Services$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kHealth$9kPhilanthropy$8kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Operation Morale Support$1,000
Shriners Hospitals for Children$1,000
Chabad Greater Hilton Head$360
South Carolina Educational TV$244
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Iraq and afghanistan Veterans of Am: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
CA
MD
TN
SC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$124k · 14 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +94% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
23

Total granted

$124k
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+13%

Still filing today

14%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $244 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH YAM
    5× · 2017–2022 · $38k
  • GH
    Grateful Hearts Soup Kitchen
    5× · 2017–2021 · $19k
  • WP
    Wexford Plantation Charitable Found
    5× · 2017–2022 · $15k

Funded once

  • CU
    Clemson University
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • CO
    College of Charleston
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • TL
    THE LIGHT HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Veterans and First Responders
Human Services
2
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Special Ops Survivors

Special ops survivors advances the mission "to embrace and empower surviving spouses of fallen special operations heroes to build healthy post-loss futures as they transition and rebuild their new lives." the foundation provides programs…

Human Services
5
The Hospice Institute of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Suncoast hospice institute is now inactive.

—
6
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
7
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
8
Air Transport Association of America Inc

Airlines for america (a4a) vigorously advocates for america's airlines as models of safety, customer service, and environmental responsibility; and as the indispensable network that drives our nation's economy and global…

—
9
Society of American Military Engineers

To provide training, education and support to the military and uniformed services and other federal, state and local government agencies responsible for the nation's infrastructure, and to advance collaboration and engagement between…

—
10
Institute for Shipboard Education

Journeys of discovery that spark bold solutions to global challenges.

Education
11
America's Essential Hospitals

America's essential hospitals champions excellence in health care for all, regardless of social or economic circumstance, and advances the work of hospitals and health systems committed to ensuring access to care and optimal health for…

—
12
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Pta Maryland Congress of Parents & Teachers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION BETH YAM: $37,583 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH YAMGrateful Hearts Soup Kitchen: $18,538 · OtherGrateful Hearts Soup KitchenWexford Plantation Charitable Found: $14,726 · OtherWexford Plantation Charitable FoundUniversity of South Carolina: $11,000 · OtherUniversity of South CarolinaAnne Arundel County Public Library: $11,000 · OtherAnne Arundel County Public LibraryClemson University: $10,526 · OtherClemson UniversityOperation Morale Support: $8,000 · OtherCollege of Charleston: $7,657 · OtherCommunity Foundation of AA County: $7,500 · Other+22 more: $56,205 · Other+22 moreWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · InternationalSURGICAL EYE EXPEDITIONS INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · InternationalTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterANNAPOLIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $4,000 · HealthHILTON HEAD HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $1,070 · AnimalsGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$182,735International$6,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Arts & Culture$5,000Health$4,000Animals$1,070Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANNAPOLIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLow Country Regional Ems Council Inc: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILTON HEAD HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $1,070 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSURGICAL EYE EXPEDITIONS INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds PTA MARYLAND CONGRESS OF PARENTS & TEACHERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ANNAPOLIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Low Country Regional Ems Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds HILTON HEAD HUMANE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SURGICAL EYE EXPEDITIONS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jacobs Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jacobs Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jacobs Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph