Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jacob Moses Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$872k
Granted FY2025still arriving
109
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$432k
Largest
01What it funds
0162% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$5.4MPhilanthropy$234kHealth$88kArts & Culture$69kHuman Services$51kEducation$14kInternational$4kRecreation & Sports$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 109 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k95 grants · $180k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $260k
  • $250k+1 grant · $432k
$1,800
Median grant
7
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOSDOS RABBEINU NACHUM MUSHUDYK$432,000
TOMCHEI TZEDAKA$43,200
BAIS MEDRASH OF HARBORVIEW$32,988
Individual grant recipient$30,000
CONG SUPPORTERS OF TORAH$25,000
Individual grant recipient$24,400
Individual grant recipient$18,000
FRIEND OF BIKUR CHOLIM- EZRAT ACHIM$17,200
TAB$16,000
DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND$12,800
AF BNEI LEVI FOUNDATION$10,400
OHEL$10,000
HEICHAL YITZCHOK$10,000
JERUSALEM FELLOWSHIP INC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AVIGDOR'S HELPING HAND: $2k → 13%AVIGDOR'S HELPING HAND: $2k → 13%ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $7k → 13%CHEVRA GEMACH INC: $500 → 6%MOSDOS NESIVAS SHALOM: $180 → 14%MOSDOS NESIVAS SHALOM: $180 → 14%ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 13%MOSDOS NESIVAS SHALOM: $180 → 14%CHEVRA GEMACH INC: $160 → 6%MOSDOS NESIVAS SHALOM: $72 → 14%ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 13%MOSDOS NESIVAS SHALOM: $72 → 14%ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 13%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $3k → 14%AHAVAS CHESED FUND: $14k → 20%AHAVAS CHESED FUND: $8k → 20%AHAVAS CHESED FUND: $8k → 20%AHAVAS CHESED FUND: $8k → 20%AHAVAS CHESED FUND: $2k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $720 → 20%A-TIME: $1k → 20%KEREN ANIYEM: $2k → 20%A-TIME: $360 → 20%A-TIME: $360 → 20%A-TIME: $360 → 20%KEREN ANIYEM: $360 → 20%A-TIME: $360 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
MD
AR
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.3M · 162 repeat orgs$790k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

162 repeat relationships: 82 still active in FY2025, 80 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

162
136

Total granted

$6.3M
$288k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
0%

Still filing today

17%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $502k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HEBRON FUND INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $88k · revenue +93%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $68k · revenue +113%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERETH YOSEF INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $48k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $57k
  • MT
    MIDWEST TORAH CENTER CORPORATION
    one grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue +14%
  • TA
    TORAH ACADEMY OF BROOKLYN
    one grant, 2024 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
2
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
American Friends of Shviti Hashem Inc

To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.

Religion
5
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
6
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
7
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
8
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
9
Sherit Isroel
—
10
American Friends of Keshet Yehuda Nfp

religious and educational program for post high school youth

Philanthropy
11
American Friends of Hamesorah Talmud Torah Inc

Charity and education in u.s. and israel

—
12
American Friends of Kehillas Shivtei Yeshurun Inc

Assistance to establish a community in ramat beit shemesh, israel, founded upon torah principles, prayer, justice, charity and kindness to all peoples. to encourage and promote jewish religious activities.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Netiv Aryeh Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Rdm Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 325 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/51
Grantees still filing
30/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOSDOS RABBANIM NACHUM MESHADYK: $2,907,989 · OtherMOSDOS RABBANIM NACHUM MESHADYKAF BNEI LEVI FOUNDATION: $436,400 · OtherAF BNEI LEVI FOUNDATIONMOSDOS RABBEINU NACHUM MUSHUDYK: $432,000 · OtherMOSDOS RABBEINU NACHUM MUSHUDYKIndividual grant recipient: $337,200 · OtherTOMCHEI TZEDAKA: $243,812 · Other+164 more: $2,282,634 · Other+164 moreHEBRON FUND INC: $88,000 · PhilanthropyHASC PA INC: $56,500 · PhilanthropyBETH ABA TRUST: $8,600 · Philanthropy+4 more: $10,360 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM: $67,700 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERETH YOSEF INC: $47,700 · InternationalEZRAT ACHIM FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN INC: $14,600 · International+1 more: $4,140 · InternationalMIDWEST TORAH CENTER CORPORATION: $13,500 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEH INC: $12,500 · ReligionFRIENDS OF OR CHAYA INC: $12,200 · ReligionTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $10,700 · ReligionNoam Shabbos Inc: $5,300 · ReligionYESHIVA OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $5,000 · ReligionTorah Images Inc: $4,360 · Religion+3 more: $4,680 · ReligionAHAVAS CHESED FUND INC: $40,700 · Human ServicesACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $12,200 · Human ServicesAVIGDORS HELPING HAND INC: $3,600 · Human ServicesKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $2,800 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $2,620 · Human ServicesKEREN ANIYIM INC: $2,160 · Human ServicesAmerican Friends of Ramot Torah Schools: $3,600 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIVOT HORAAH: $2,860 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC: $1,980 · EducationBAIS YAAKOV ATERES MIRIAM: $1,800 · Education
Other$6,640,035Philanthropy$163,460International$134,140Religion$68,240Human Services$64,080Education$10,240

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEBRON FUND INC: $88,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM: $67,700 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetHASC PA INC: $56,500 over 5y, 53% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERETH YOSEF INC: $47,700 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetKIDS OF COURAGE INC: $27,400 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetEZRAT ACHIM FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN INC: $14,600 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetMIDWEST TORAH CENTER CORPORATION: $13,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetYESHIVA DERECH CHAIM: $13,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEH INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $12,200 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF OR CHAYA INC: $12,200 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $10,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ABA TRUST: $8,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNoam Shabbos Inc: $5,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTorah Images Inc: $4,360 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetSHUVU RETURN INC: $4,360 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TORAH BTZFAT INC: $4,140 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAVIGDORS HELPING HAND INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Friends of Ramot Torah Schools: $3,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIVOT HORAAH: $2,860 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $2,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $2,620 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN ANIYIM INC: $2,160 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE RDM FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOHR NOSSON INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHADRAT DAVID INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC: $1,980 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ATERES MIRIAM: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIKVAH SARA LAYA BINYAN LIBA: $1,800 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOhr Olam Corp: $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSimchas Yom Tov Inc: $1,440 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMACHON HAHALACHA COMMUNITY KOLLEL INC: $1,080 over 4y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEBRON FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM ↗
  • Who funds HASC PA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERETH YOSEF INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS OF COURAGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zichron Chaim Charity FundNY54.3× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Belsky Family Foundation Inc · The Jmg Foundation · The Foop Foundation · Chehebar Family Foundation · Alyad Foundation Inc · The Ganger Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jacob Moses Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jacob Moses Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    10get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 325 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jacob Moses’ filings →

    More from the funding graph