· Private foundation
The Jacob & Eugenie Bucky Memorial Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GLENS FALLS ROTARY FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| DOUBLE H - HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC | $12,500 |
| FAMILY YMCA AT TARRYTOWN | $10,000 |
| NYSARC INC SARATOGA CHAPTER | $6,174 |
| ARC OF ESSEX COUNTY INC | $6,000 |
| CHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| GLOBAL SMILE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ROTARY FOUNDATION OF THE TARRYTOWNS | $5,000 |
| OASIS A HOME FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN | $5,000 |
| ANSONIA MUSIC OUTREACH ORGANIZATION INC | $5,000 |
| BEN OSBORN MEMORIAL FUND | $5,000 |
| BEREA COLLEGE | $3,500 |
| RIVERTOWNS VILLAGE GREEN INC | $3,000 |
| GLENS FALLS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| AIM SERVICES INC | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GFGLENS FALLS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2024 · $16k · revenue +165%
- TRTHE ROTARY CLUB OF THE TARRYTOWNS INC2× · 2021–2022 · $15k · revenue +75% · 53% of their budget
- ALALICE LLOYD COLLEGE3× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- ODOPEN DOOR MISSION INCone grant, 2023 · $20k
- RCROTARY CLUB OF GLEN FALLS NYone grant, 2021 · $15k
- TRTARRYTOWNS ROTARY FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The suny cortland child care center is dedicated to providing affordable child care for the children of the college's employees and students, which meets the highest nationally recognized standards. qualified staff provide an educational…
The center's mission is to provide quality childcare services to the morrisville state college campus and the local community in a safe and nurturing environment which promotes the social, emotional, physical, language and cognitive…
The center strives to provide a range of services that support working parents while fostering the emotional, social, physical and intellectual growth of their children. special consideration is given to low income families and families…
A developmental day care center providing care for special needs and non-special needs children.
To provide quality day care on a year round basis for children of working families.
It is the mission of the roxbury day care center to provide quality child care for all families in the community in a warm, nurturing, loving and educational environment. the child care needs of all economic levels are served, enabling…
Children's services
Operate and maintain a day care center for children of students, faculty, and staff of the state university of new york at new paltz, and for children of the greater new paltz community.
To help working families thrive by providing equitable access to high-quality child care and early education to a diverse group of children through innovative, developmentally appropriate programming and a holistic approach to supporting…
The rahway day care center provides full time and part time day care where children throughout the full year can develop socially, emotionally, physically, and intellectually in an affordable day care run by dedicated and professional…
The west hill school offers pre-school age children a safe and nurturing environment that encourages a life-long celebration of learning. through our rich and varied curriculum, balanced with play and multisensory academic instruction, the…
Committed to providing families with the highest standard of child-inspired, professionally-nurtured care and opportunities for learning.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Ymca at Tarrytown and the most unlike its peers is Alice Lloyd College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY YMCA at TARRYTOWN ↗
- Who funds GLENS FALLS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY CLUB OF THE TARRYTOWNS INC ↗
- Who funds ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds TARRYTOWNS ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL SMILE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Child Advocacy Center of Carroll County ↗
- Who funds ANSONIA MUSIC OUTREACH ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE WESLEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & RAPE CRISIS SERVICES OF SARATOGA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKLAND COUNTY YMCA ↗
- Who funds RIVERTOWNS VILLAGE GREEN INC ↗
- Who funds OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds The Ben Osborn Memorial Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds CITYARTS INC ↗
- Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF ESSEX COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds WOLFEBORO AREA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ANDERSON FOUNDATION FOR AUTISM ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BASEBALL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Westfield Day Care Center Inc ↗
- Who funds UNION COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds PIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds AIM SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE SPRINGS EQUESTRIAN THERAPY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Miles Hodsdon Vernon Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Jacob & Eugenie Bucky Memorial Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Arc of Essex County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Westfield Day Care Center Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Jacob & Eugenie Bucky Memorial Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Jacob & Eugenie Bucky Memorial Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.