Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Jabaly Foundation Ltd

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$568
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$368
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$11kReligion$10kCivil Rights$7kInternational$5kArts & Culture$2kEducation$2kEnvironment$1kAnimals$250Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$368
Median grant
1
States reached
$401k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$368
Individual grant recipient$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 81% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PLANET WATER FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%OXFAM AMERICA: $1k → 16%SIERRA CLUB: $800 → 10%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $400 → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $500 → 10%HOUSTON METHODIST: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS-HOPE TEXARKA: $2k → 21%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $2k → 9%THE ALS ASSOCIATION: $10k → 7%WATER AID US: $638 → 17%KPFT: $2k → 16%WATERAID AMERICA: $500 → 17%FROSTWOOD PTA: $13k → 16%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $500 → 17%MMS BAND: $368 → 16%AMNESTY INTNL USA: $400 → 17%NANCY LUCIO: $200 → 16%ASPCA: $250 → 17%UNIATED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICING: $5k → 16%UNICEF: $1k → 17%UNIATED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICING: $2k → 16%ACLU: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
CT
CA
VA
AZ
AR
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
The International Dark-Sky Association Inc

Darksky international restores the nighttime environment and protects communities from the harmful effects of light pollution through outreach, advocacy, and conservation.

4
Arrow

To make grants to charitable organizations and programs that support the achievement of sexual and reproductive health (srh) of the poor & underprivileged women and others in the asia-pacific and elsewhere.

International
5
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
6
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
7
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
8
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
9
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
10
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
11
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

12
Waterkeeper Alliance Inc

To protect our right to clean water in communities around the world.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $13,130 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOUSTON METHODIST — $10,000 · OtherHOUSTON METHODISTUNIATED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICING — $6,500 · OtherUNIATED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICINGUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS-HOPE TEXARKA — $2,260 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS-HOPE TEXARKAKPFT — $2,000 · OtherKPFT+7 more — $3,406 · Other+7 moreAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $10,000 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SC…PLANNED PARENTHOOD — $500 · HealthSave The Children Federation Inc — $1,500 · InternationalSave The …OXFAM-AMERICA INC — $1,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AME…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $1,000 · InternationalUNITED ST…WATERAID AMERICA INC — $500 · InternationalWATERAID …MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $500 · InternationalMEDECINS …NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $400 · EnvironmentTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $250 · Animals
Other$37,296Health$10,500International$4,500Environment$400Animals$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB — $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATERAID AMERICA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANET WATER FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Jabaly Foundation Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph