Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Italian American Club Foundation

Provide scholarships & grants

$413k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Education$270kHealth$81kRecreation & Sports$68kFood & Nutrition$39kYouth Development$39kHousing & Shelter$21k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $123,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $413,230 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $290,230 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$11,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS HIGH SCHOOL$50,000
MN TEAMSTERS FOOD SHELF$11,000
WIGGLE YOUR TOES$11,000
MN NATIONAL GUARD YOUTH CAMP$11,000
CHAMPLIN PARK HOCKEY$11,000
GOLDEN GLOVES$11,000
SMILE NETWORK$6,000
CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION$6,000
BRIDGING$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 43% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%COLUMBIA HEIGHTS HIGH SCHOOL: $70k → 7%MN TEAMSTERS FOOD SHELF: $11k → 11%MN NATIONAL GUARD YOUTH CAMP: $11k → 14%CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%COLUMBIA HEIGHTS HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 7%MN TEAMSTERS FOOD SHELF: $10k → 11%MN NATIONAL GUARD YOUTH CAMP: $10k → 14%CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%COLUMBIA HEIGHTS HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 7%MN TEAMSTERS FOOD SHELF: $10k → 11%MN NATIONAL GUARD YOUTH CAMP: $10k → 14%CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION: $6k → 17%COLUMBIA HEIGHTS HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 7%MN TEAMSTERS FOOD SHELF: $8k → 11%MN NATIONAL GUARD YOUTH CAMP: $8k → 14%COLUMBIA HEIGHTS HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 7%CHAMPLIN PARK HOCKEY: $11k → 11%GOLDEN GLOVES: $11k → 7%CHAMPLIN PARK HOCKEY: $8k → 11%GOLDEN GLOVES: $8k → 7%CHAMPLIN PARK HOCKEY: $8k → 11%GOLDEN GLOVES: $8k → 7%CHAMPLIN PARK HOCKEY: $8k → 11%NORTH METRO HOCKEY ASSOC: $8k → 11%WIGGLE YOUR TOES: $11k → 11%WIGGLE YOUR TOES: $10k → 11%WIGGLE YOUR TOES: $10k → 11%WIGGLE YOUR TOES: $8k → 11%BRIDGING: $8k → 11%BRIDGING: $8k → 11%BRIDGING: $6k → 11%SMILE NETWORK: $6k → 11%SMILE NETWORK: $8k → 11%SMILE NETWORK: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$510k · 9 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against -67% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$510k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-67%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WY
    WIGGLE YOUR TOES INCORPORATED
    4× · 2022–2025 · $39k · revenue +30%
  • MN
    MINNESOTA NATIONAL GUARD YOUTH CAMP INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $39k · revenue +649% · 39% of their budget
  • MT
    MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS FOOD SHELF
    4× · 2022–2025 · $39k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • BP
    BROOKLYN PARK YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -67%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City of Lakes Youth Hockey Association

City of lakes youth hockey association is a 501 (c)(3) organization founded in 2009 to provide affordable coed hockey in north and northeast minneapolis.

Recreation & Sports
2
Benson Hockey Association

To provide and promote a youth hockey program in the benson mn area for youth under the age of 18 by providing ice time, coaches, tournaments, a summer hockey camp, equipment schedules and transportation to games.

3
North Park Hockey Association

Organizes youth hockey teams to play in a hockey league.

Recreation & Sports
4
Bemidji Youth Hockey Association Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide positive programming for the development of youth through sports. objectives include, but are not limited to: physical and social development, working together, discipline, respect, caring,…

Recreation & Sports
5
Millbrook Youth Hockey Association

Youth community ice hockey for boys and girls

Recreation & Sports
6
Northeast Wisconsin Hockey Assn Inc

Develop hockey skills in youth hockey players and provide a competitive team to compete with other teams in the midwest.

7
Johnson Como North St Paul Hockey Association

Promotion of youth development the johnson como hockey association is dedicated to the principles of fair play and good sportsmanship, and the development of competitive hockey players of all ages.

8
Northern Berkshire Youth Hockey League Inc
9
North Dakota Amateur Hockey Association

To provide opportunities for youth aged 6-19 to learn the sport of hockey and to develop their skills to the next level of play.

Recreation & Sports
10
North Pittsburgh Youth Hockey Assoc

Npyha promotes youth hockey leagues to teach teamwork, discipline,leadership and sportsmanship.

Recreation & Sports
11
Park Rapids Hockey Inc

The aim of the park rapids amateur hockey association is to provide a well balanced, competitive hockey program for boys and girls, and to enrich the lives of the players.

Recreation & Sports
12
Waunakee Youth Hockey Association Inc

To provide an organized program for local youth to participate in the sport of hockey.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wiggle Your Toes Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $270,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA HEIGHTS PUBLIC SCHOOLSGOLDEN GLOVES FIREHOUSE GYM OUTREACH PROGRAM — $26,000 · OtherGOLDEN GLOVES FIREHOUSE GYM OUTREACH PROGRAMBridging Inc — $21,000 · OtherBridging Inc+1 more — $7,500 · OtherWIGGLE YOUR TOES INCORPORATED — $39,000 · HealthWIGGLE YOUR TOES …CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $21,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS…SMILE NETWORK INTERNATIONAL — $21,000 · HealthSMILE NETWORK INT…MINNESOTA NATIONAL GUARD YOUTH CAMP INC — $39,000 · Youth DevelopmentMINNESOTA TEAMSTERS FOOD SHELF — $39,000 · Food & NutritionCHAMPLIN PARK YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION — $34,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$324,500Health$81,000Youth Development$39,000Food & Nutrition$39,000Recreation & Sports$34,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWIGGLE YOUR TOES INCORPORATED — $39,000 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetMINNESOTA NATIONAL GUARD YOUTH CAMP INC — $39,000 over 4y, 39% of budgetMINNESOTA TEAMSTERS FOOD SHELF — $39,000 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetCHAMPLIN PARK YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION — $34,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE NETWORK INTERNATIONAL — $21,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBridging Inc — $21,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKLYN PARK YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION — $7,500 over 1y, 5.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Italian American Club Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2022
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Italian American Club Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Italian American Club Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph