· Private foundation
Mueller Hoisel Wanger Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $57k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LONGYEAR MUSEUM | $50,000 |
| TALLWOOD HOUSE | $25,000 |
| PEACE HAVEN ASSOC | $25,000 |
| First Church of Christ Scientist | $3,000 |
| CEDARS CAMP | $3,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR PRAYERFUL LIVING | $3,000 |
| THE PRINCIPIA | $3,000 |
| Chestnut Hill Benevolent Assoc | $3,000 |
| Daystar Inc | $3,000 |
| HIGH RIDGE HOUSE | $3,000 |
| WIDE HORIZONS INC | $3,000 |
| LYNN HOUSE OF POTOMAX VALLEY | $3,000 |
| BROADVIEW INC | $3,000 |
| Camps NewfoundOwatonna | $3,000 |
| Symphony New HaMpshire | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
LONGYEAR FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2025 · $177k · revenue +22%- TPThe Principia Corporation8× · 2017–2025 · $111k · revenue +88%
Lynn House of Potomac Valley Inc5× · 2021–2025 · $36k · revenue +91%
Funded once
- THTALLWOODS HOUSEone grant, 2021 · $15k
- CSC S NURSING SVC NHone grant, 2019 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Nursing care for christian scientists.
Desert views mission is to support an individuals healing practice of christian science by providing christian science nursing whenever there is a need.
Providing financial support to non-profit care facilities for nursing/care.
Christian science nursing-inspiring, loving, and healing humanity. sunrise haven exists to provide an environment conducive to spiritual healing for the practice of christian science nursing as established in the church manual bylaw.
To provide christian science nursing care in a homelike setting.
The christ college of nursing and health sciences, guided by its core values and enriched by a foundation in the arts and sciences, prepares individuals both for delivery of healthcare that promotes the well-being of a dynamic society and…
The mission of clearview home is to provide a sanctuary for healing by shining the light of love through christian science nursing.
Pittsboro Christian Village is a caring and compassionate continuing care retirement community for the Lord's people during their senior years. We provide our resident's spiritual and physical well-being, guided by biblical principles to…
Glenmont's mission is to exemplify the healing ministry of christian science as articulated in the church manual and in science and health with key to the scriptures by mary baker eddy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chestnut Hill Benevolent Association and the most unlike its peers is Asher Student Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LONGYEAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Principia Corporation ↗
- Who funds PEACE HAVEN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Lynn House of Potomac Valley Inc ↗
- Who funds Camp Newfound Owatonna Corporation ↗
- Who funds SYMPHONY NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds TWELVEACRES INC ↗
- Who funds DAYSTAR INC ↗
- Who funds Chestnut Hill Benevolent Association ↗
- Who funds ASHER STUDENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARDEN WOOD INC ↗
- Who funds WIDE HORIZON INC ↗
- Who funds THE ALBERT BAKER FUND ↗
- Who funds Broadview Inc ↗
- Who funds RHODE ISLAND COMPUTER MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR PRAYERFUL LIVING ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tenacre Foundation · The Isabel Foundation · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Joseph Warren Foundation · The Thomas and Michele Parsons Family Foundation · Annie Foundation · Towle Family Foundation · The Borch Foundation · The Tiny Tiger Foundation · Belvedere Scientific Fund · Powell Crown Foundation · The Membery Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mueller Hoisel Wanger Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.