Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Irving and Geraldine Schaffer Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$489k
Granted FY2024still arriving
73
Grants FY2024still arriving
22
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

International$575kPhilanthropy$291kEducation$273kHealth$215kArts & Culture$211kReligion$191kYouth Development$169kCrime & Legal$120kOther$0
02FY2024 · 73 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k50 grants · $109k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $334k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$3,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW ISRAEL FUND$50,000
TRICKLE UP$40,000
PLEASANTVILLE COMMUNITY SYNAGOGUE$31,500
REAP$30,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
J STREET EDUCATION FOUNDATION$20,000
UNITED WAY FOX CITIES$15,000
FIDELITY CHARITABLE$15,000
BANK STREET SCHOOL OF EDUCATION$15,000
NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO$15,000
NY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$12,000
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE$10,000
WHITE PLAINS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION OFFICE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
NEW GEORGIA PROJECT$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $188k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%REAP: $57k → 12%THE CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS: $3k → 5%REAP: $30k → 12%THE CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS: $2k → 5%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $500 → 6%REAP: $25k → 12%CHIPS: $5k → 20%REAP: $25k → 12%REAP: $25k → 12%CHIPS: $5k → 20%JCC ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $3k → 17%JCC ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $3k → 17%JCC ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $3k → 17%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER: $1k → 9%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER: $1k → 9%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER: $1k → 9%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 74 repeat orgs$335k to everyone else

74 repeat relationships: 49 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
64

Total granted

$1.9M
$297k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+21%

Still filing today

59%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCivil RightsHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    TRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $240k · revenue +70%
  • RI
    REAP INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $162k · revenue +69%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • P
    PCS
    one grant, 2019 · $55k
  • R
    REAP
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • TA
    THE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
2
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
3
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
10
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Renewal Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Allied Printing Services Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 165 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
83/86
Grantees still filing
59/86
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLEASANTVILLE COMMUNITY SYNAGOGUE: $131,580 · OtherPLEASANTVILLE COMMUNITY SYNAGOGUEJ STREET EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $95,000 · OtherJ STREET EDUCATION FOUNDATIONBANK STREET SCHOOL OF EDUCATION: $86,000 · OtherBANK STREET SCHOOL OF EDUCATIONIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIDELITY CHARITABLE: $60,000 · OtherPCS: $54,600 · OtherWHITE PLAINS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION OFFICE: $50,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $50,000 · OtherNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $60,000 · Other+118 more: $739,876 · Other+118 moreTRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC: $240,000 · Community ImprovementTRICKLE UP PROG…FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $105,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVEST…BROWN UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $17,000 · Community ImprovementNEW ISRAEL FUND: $300,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDHIAS INC: $31,000 · InternationalHIAS INC+4 more: $28,000 · International+4 moreREAP INC: $161,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $7,500 · Human Services+3 more: $8,750 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $40,000 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $35,000 · Civil RightsCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $20,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $18,000 · Civil RightsROCK THE VOTE: $15,000 · Civil RightsPENNSYLVANIA VOICE: $12,500 · Civil Rights+3 more: $11,000 · Civil RightsNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $60,000 · Arts & CultureJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC: $28,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HARMONY PROGRAM INC: $26,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $5,750 · Arts & CultureVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC: $60,000 · Crime & LegalTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $15,000 · Crime & LegalPILNET: $10,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $7,750 · Crime & LegalNEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,407,056Community Improvement$377,000International$359,000Human Services$187,750Civil Rights$151,500Arts & Culture$119,750Crime & Legal$97,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $300,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC: $240,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetREAP INC: $161,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $105,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC: $42,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $32,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $31,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHAND IN HAND: $30,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC: $28,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HARMONY PROGRAM INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY FOR LAW & POLICY: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROCK THE VOTE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA VOICE: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER INC: $11,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPILNET: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ALLIED PRINTING SERVICES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $7,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OLANA PARTNERSHIP: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWS FOR RACIAL & ECONOMIC JUSTICE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDGEMONT SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS INC: $4,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN AND BLUE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBill of Rights Institute: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF WESTCHESTER INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds TRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds REAP INC ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds VERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAND IN HAND ↗
  • Who funds JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HARMONY PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY FOR LAW & POLICY ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMORROW WE VOTE ↗
  • Who funds ROCK THE VOTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY17.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Open Society Institute · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Fjc · The Ford Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Irving and Geraldine Schaffer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Irving and Geraldine Schaffer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Reap Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Greenwoods Counseling & Referrals Inc: 7% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 2% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Irving and Geraldine Schaffer Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Irving and Geraldine Schaffer Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 165 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Irving and Geraldine Schaffer’s filings →

More from the funding graph