Skip to content
The Imus Ranch Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Imus Ranch Inc

THE PRIMARY EXEMPT PURPOSE OF THE IMUS RANCH INC.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$275k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.4MHuman Services$885kRecreation & Sports$175kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kFood & Nutrition$20kPhilanthropy$8kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $445k
  • $250k+2 grants · $525k
$100,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Children's Health Defense$275,000
Individual grant recipient$250,000
Little Star Foundation$150,000
Open My World Therapeutic Riding Ce$115,000
Hand To Hold Org$100,000
Liberty and Loyalty Foundation$80,000
SolWest Foundation$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Eileen Fund$2,030
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $600k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%Little Star Foundation: $250k → 11%Little Star Foundation: $200k → 11%Little Star Foundation: $150k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
NJ
CA
NM
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 11 repeat orgs$970k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
12

Total granted

$3.5M
$950k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
0%

Still filing today

45%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsEnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +123%
  • LL
    Liberty & Loyalty Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $165k · revenue +26%
  • FT
    FOR THE CITY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $8k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • HM
    HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $250k
  • SK
    SICK KIDS (NEED) INVOLVED PEOPLE OF NEW YORK INC
    one grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue -28%
  • MO
    Mercury One Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +177%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
2
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
3
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
4
Chance for Life

Chance for life's mission is to raise awareness and funds for critical research and clinical trials for pediatric cancer in the united states of america.

Health
5
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
6
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
7
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
8
Children's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc

Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.

Health
9
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
10
Animal Cancer Foundation

Animal cancer foundation is dedicated to finding new treatments and eventual cures for cancer by funding research in and increasing public awareness of comparative oncology, the study of naturally occurring, similar cancers in people and…

Health
11
Children's Cancer Research Fund

Children's cancer research fund fuels transformational research to bring better treatments and cures to children with cancer.

Philanthropy
12
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Defense; the most unlike its peers is For the City Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $825,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOpen My World Therapeutic Riding Ce: $265,000 · OtherOpen My World Therapeutic Riding CeHand To Hold Org: $260,000 · OtherHand To Hold OrgHACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH INC: $250,000 · OtherHACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH INCSICK KIDS (NEED) INVOLVED PEOPLE OF NEW YORK INC: $250,000 · OtherSICK KIDS (NEED) INVOLVED PEOPLE OF NEW YORK INCNYU WINTHROP HOSPITAL: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherCHANCE FOR HOPE FOUNDATION: $78,000 · Other+5 more: $94,300 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $1,080,000 · EnvironmentCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSELITTLE STAR FOUNDATION INC: $600,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE STAR FOU…ADAM'S ANGELS MINISTRY: $125,000 · HealthTHE EILEEN FUND CORP: $102,030 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $25,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthLiberty & Loyalty Foundation: $165,000 · Recreation & SportsWASHINGTON COUNTY FAIR ASSOC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsMercury One Inc: $100,000 · InternationalSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,113 · Animals
Other$2,202,300Environment$1,080,000Human Services$600,000Health$357,030Recreation & Sports$175,000International$100,000Animals$5,113

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $1,080,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetLITTLE STAR FOUNDATION INC: $600,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetLiberty & Loyalty Foundation: $165,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetADAM'S ANGELS MINISTRY: $125,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetTHE EILEEN FUND CORP: $102,030 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetMercury One Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNYU WINTHROP HOSPITAL: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY FAIR ASSOC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOR THE CITY INC: $7,500 over 2y, 14% of budgetSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,113 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CITIZENS FOR HEALTH CHOICE: $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Imus Ranch Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Imus Ranch Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Imus Ranch Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Imus Ranch Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Imus Ranch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home