Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Impermanent Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Health$45kInternational$20kYouth Development$12kCommunity Improvement$10kFood & Nutrition$10kHuman Services$10kCivil Rights$10kPublic Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$935k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC$10,000
COMMUNITY SHARES OF WISCONSIN INC$10,000
BABIES & BEYOND OF WI INC$10,000
OREGON AREA FOOD PANTRY$10,000
WOMEN'S MEDICAL FUND INC$10,000
YOUTH FRONTIERS INC$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $2k → 11%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
2
NourishMKE Inc

We're a network of community food centers that specializes in food, love, and community. Hunger is a real problem, and access to food should be a fundamental right. No one should be made to feel they're not deserving of nourishment when…

Food & Nutrition
3
Grassroots Organizing Western Wisconsin

See schedule o.to build power together to create the change need for everyone in the communities to make ends meet, live with dignity, and have a voice in shaping the decisions that impaction.

Public Benefit
4
Groundwork Milwaukee Inc

Bring about the sustained regeneration, improvement, and management of the physical environment by developing community-based partnerships that empower people, businesses, and organizations to promote environmental, economic, and social…

Environment
5
Wisconsin Wildlife Federation Inc

The wisconsin wildlife federation has a dual mission to engage in conservation education and to advocate for sound conservation policy.

Environment
6
One Wisconsin Now Inc

To advance progressive values, ideas and policies through research, policy, networking, advocacy and public education.

7
Renew Wisconsin Inc

Renew wisconsin leads and accelerates the transformation to wisconsin's renewable energy future through advocacy, education, and collaboration.

Environment
8
Just Food Initiative of the Fox Valley
Food & Nutrition
9
Law Forward Inc

To preserve fundamental democratic principles, support wisconsin's commitment to clean and open government, and promote a progressive vision through impact litigation, administrative processes and public education.

Crime & Legal
10
Our Wisconsin Revolution Inc

To promote the common good and general welfare of the people of wisconsin.

Civil Rights
11
Pro-Life Wisconsin Inc

Defend the right to life of all citizens of our state, whether born or preborn, young, old, disabled, or terminally ill. we affirm that the right to life exists at the moment of fertilization and extends until natural death.

12
Hearts for Families a Wisconsin Non Stock

Assistance to needy families

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Frontiers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Oregon Area Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
2/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROCKFORD FAMILY PLANNING FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · HealthROCKFORD FAMILY PLANNING FOUNDATION IN…WOMEN'S MEDICAL FUND INC — $10,000 · HealthWOMEN'S MEDICAL FUND INCCOMMUNITY SHARES OF WISCONSIN INC — $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY SHARES …Babies & Beyond of WI Inc — $10,000 · OtherBabies & Beyond o…SHELTER FROM THE STORM ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $1,000 · OtherUnited States Association for UNHCR — $20,000 · InternationalUnited States Ass…VOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesVOCES DE L…YOUTH FRONTIERS INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH FRON…Oregon Area Food Pantry — $10,000 · Food & NutritionWHEELS FOR WINNERS INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCENTER FOR COMMUNITY STEWARDSHIP — $10,000 · Community ImprovementROOTED WI INC — $5,000 · Environment
Health$45,000Other$21,000International$20,000Human Services$12,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Youth Development$10,000Community Improvement$10,000Environment$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROCKFORD FAMILY PLANNING FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOregon Area Food Pantry — $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWHEELS FOR WINNERS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetVOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY STEWARDSHIP — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY SHARES OF WISCONSIN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN'S MEDICAL FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBabies & Beyond of WI Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetROOTED WI INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH FRONTIERS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER FROM THE STORM ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Evjue Foundation IncWI17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Evjue Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · United Way of Dane County Inc · Trustage Foundation Inc · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · Madison Community Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Impermanent Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph