· Private foundation
Iac Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $97k
- $10k–50k49 grants · $746k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HUDSON GUILD | $300,000 |
| AMERICA ON TECH | $50,000 |
| MOUSE INC | $30,000 |
| FRIENDS OF HUDSON RIVER PARK INC | $30,000 |
| FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC | $30,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE HIGHLINE | $25,000 |
| THE JUILLIARD SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA | $25,000 |
| GOTHAM GIVES INC | $25,000 |
| NEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT | $25,000 |
| LITERACY PARTNERS INC | $25,000 |
| CHURCH OF THE HOLY APOSTLES SOUP KITCHEN | $21,375 |
| C DEOPERSAUD | $20,000 |
| JONES VALLEY URBAN FARM | $20,000 |
| THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $577k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
57 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $446k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HGHUDSON GUILDINC4× · 2020–2025 · $368k · revenue +25%
- ERE4E RELIEF LLC2× · 2023–2024 · $190k · revenue +74%
- FOFRIENDS OF HUDSON RIVER PARK INC5× · 2021–2025 · $150k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- MRMGM RESORTS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $100k
- PIPROSECUTOR IMPACTone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -100%
- CFCLOONEY FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICEone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University and the most unlike its peers is Sacred Ways Foundation Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
120 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 120 of the 238 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HUDSON GUILDINC ↗
- Who funds GOTHAM GIVES INC ↗
- Who funds E4E RELIEF LLC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HUDSON RIVER PARK INC ↗
- Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA ↗
- Who funds PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FDNY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds New York City Partnership Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds PROSECUTOR IMPACT ↗
- Who funds CLOONEY FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds AMERICA ON TECH INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ROUSSEAU INC ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Children's Hospital of Alabama ↗
- Who funds AMERICA NEEDS YOU ↗
- Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
- Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PREP FOR PREP ↗
- Who funds HUDSON RIVER COMMUNITY SAILING INC ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE FOR A DIVERSE AMERICA ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL IOWA INC ↗
- Who funds THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN EVENTS GROUP INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Sidley Austin Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · May and Samuel Rudin Family Foundation Inc · Altman Foundation · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Pwc Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Iac Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Thread Inc — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
- Wheaton College — 0% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Iac Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Iac Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.