Skip to content
The Huskinson Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Huskinson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$449k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$215k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$742kReligion$605kHealth$529kAnimals$258kFood & Nutrition$173kCommunity Improvement$100kEducation$80kPublic Benefit$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $123k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $315k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS$215,000
GARDEN CITY$100,000
INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$46,000
CACHE VALLEY FOR HOPE$33,000
WARRIOR EXPEDITIONS$20,000
BLACKFOOT HIGH SCHOOL$14,024
FIRST STEP HOUSE$10,000
ONE WISH INC$5,607
LEE'S CARES FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%WARRIOR EXPEDITIONS: $20k → 8%OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $14k → 12%OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $4k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 16 repeat orgs$384k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against -75% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$2.2M
$240k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
-75%

Still filing today

56%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $144k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CACHE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC
    2× · 2017–2022 · $102k · revenue +105%
  • CE
    CACHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2023 · $35k · revenue +49%
  • TF
    THE FAMILY PLACE UTAH FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHILD & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF CACHE
    3× · 2017–2020 · $26k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTE
    one grant, 2021 · $75k
  • BL
    BEAR LAKE LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • IY
    INTERFAITH YOUTH CHAPEL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue -96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Geological Foundation
—
2
Idaho Elks Rehab Hospital Inc
Health
3
Intermountain Medical Holdings Nevada Inc

Helping people live the healthiest lives possible.

Health
4
Indigenous Idaho Alliance Inc
Civil Rights
5
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
6
Utah Healthcare Institute Inc

Provide graduate medical education including national accredited community-based graduate medical education program for family medicine physicians.

Education
7
Building Hope Idaho Inc
Philanthropy
8
Autism Foundation of Utah
Health
9
Central Utah Enterprises

To provide services to disabled persons with a focus on assisting individuals in Utah County with cognitive disabilities gain skills to enable them to enter the workforce.

—
10
Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake

To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…

—
11
Cache Employment & Training Center

Training and supports for individuals with disabilities.

Employment
12
Utah Swat Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Intermountain Healthcare Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ccd Smiles. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $444,500 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSCACHE VALLEY FOR HOPE: $361,500 · OtherCACHE VALLEY FOR HOPELIFTING GENERATIONS INC: $300,000 · OtherLIFTING GENERATIONS INCTITLE FINANCIAL COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $257,703 · OtherTITLE FINANCIAL COMMUNITY OUTREACH INCGARDEN CITY: $100,000 · OtherGARDEN CITYTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTE: $75,000 · Other+13 more: $300,290 · Other+13 moreINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $366,000 · HealthINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCA…CCD Smiles: $125,000 · HealthCCD Smiles+2 more: $20,000 · HealthCACHE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $102,000 · International+1 more: $2,800 · InternationalWARRIOR EXPEDITIONS: $20,000 · Human ServicesCITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE: $20,000 · Human ServicesOPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $18,100 · Human ServicesLEES CARES FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Public Benefit
Other$1,838,993Health$511,000International$104,800Human Services$58,100Public Benefit$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $366,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLIFTING GENERATIONS INC: $300,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetCCD Smiles: $125,000 over 2y, 58% of budgetCACHE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $102,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetINTERFAITH YOUTH CHAPEL INC: $35,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetCACHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $34,786 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FAMILY PLACE UTAH FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHILD & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF CACHE: $26,360 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLEES CARES FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetWARRIOR EXPEDITIONS: $20,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetCITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $18,100 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFIRST STEP HOUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR ETHNOMEDICINE INC DBA BRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGES TO AMERICA INC REFUGEE SOCCER: $2,800 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFTING GENERATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CCD Smiles ↗
  • Who funds CACHE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH YOUTH CHAPEL INC ↗
  • Who funds CACHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY PLACE UTAH FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHILD & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF CACHE ↗
  • Who funds LEES CARES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WARRIOR EXPEDITIONS ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds FIRST STEP HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR ETHNOMEDICINE INC DBA BRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES TO AMERICA INC REFUGEE SOCCER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Broadbent Family …Thom & Gail Williamse…Sorenson Legacy Found…George S and Dolores …American Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Broadbent Family FoundationUT22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Broadbent Family Foundation · Thom & Gail Williamsen Family Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Huskinson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Huskinson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Huskinson Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Huskinson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Huskinson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home