Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hunter Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$155k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$515kYouth Development$300kReligion$130kHealth$105kPhilanthropy$65kEnvironment$55kArts & Culture$50kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
450 BULL STREET FOUNDATION$65,000
ELEVATE SAVANNAH$50,000
MAKE-A-WISH GEORGIA$15,000
MEDBANK FOUNDATION$10,000
BETHESDA ACADEMY$10,000
THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SPANISH OAKS FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 11 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+60%

Still filing today

64%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EU
    ELEVATE USA
    5× · 2019–2023 · $200k · revenue +200%
  • ES
    ELEVATE SAVANNAH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $100k · revenue +2%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $75k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • PH
    PLATT HEAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • SS
    SAFE SHELTER CENTER FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +60%
  • SO
    Spanish Oaks Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -51% · 47% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Savannah Book Festival Inc

The savannah book festival is an annual event, free and open to the public, in celebration of the written work and its role in improving the human experience. our mission is to promote reading, writing, and civil conversation.

Education
2
Saluda Shoals Foundation

The Saluda Shoals Foundation is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization which serves as an advocate for the preservation and sustainability of Saluda Shoals Park through financial support, fostering partnerships, supporting programs and…

Recreation & Sports
3
The Saluda Charitable Foundation Inc
International
4
Shenandoah Foundation
—
5
Sacramento Tree Foundation

The Sacramento Tree Foundation is a community benefit organization working to grow thriving communities through stewardship of our urban forest.

Environment
6
Southern Oaks Sanctuary
Animals
7
Savannah Museum of African Art Inc
Arts & Culture
8
Saving Saluda Strays
Animals
9
Seattle Architectural Foundation

The Seattle Architecture Foundation connects people to the architecture, design, and history of Seattle. We believe the more you engage with design, the more you feel connected to your changing city. As a volunteer driven organization, we…

Arts & Culture
10
South Carolina National Heritage Corridor

The organization's primary mission is a grassroots initiative that advances sustainable development of natural, cultural and historic resources for enhanced quality of life and economic revitalization of communities in south carolina.

Arts & Culture
11
Florida State Parks Foundation Inc

Florida state parks foundation preserves, protects, sustains and grows florida state parks.

Recreation & Sports
12
Housing Savannah Inc

To raise awareness and support the affordable and workforce housing initiatives in the greater savannah/chatham county area.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Savannah Tree Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Spanish Oaks Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $350,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBETHESDA ACADEMY: $165,000 · OtherBETHESDA ACADEMYST JOHN'S CHURCH: $130,000 · OtherST JOHN'S CHURCHSAVANNAH TREE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · OtherSAVANNAH TREE FOUNDATION INC+3 more: $20,000 · OtherELEVATE USA: $200,000 · EducationELEVATE USA450 BULL STREET FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 · Arts & Culture450 BULL S…SAVANNAH MUSIC FESTIVALINC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureSAVANNAH M…ELEVATE SAVANNAH: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentELEVATE S…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC: $75,000 · PhilanthropyMEDBANK FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · HealthTHE PISGAH CONSERVANCY: $15,000 · EnvironmentSAFE SHELTER CENTER FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesSpanish Oaks Foundation Inc: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$705,000Education$200,000Arts & Culture$110,000Youth Development$100,000Philanthropy$75,000Health$20,000Environment$15,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetELEVATE USA: $200,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetELEVATE SAVANNAH: $100,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC: $75,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budget450 BULL STREET FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetSAVANNAH MUSIC FESTIVALINC: $45,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSAVANNAH TREE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetMEDBANK FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTHE PISGAH CONSERVANCY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSAFE SHELTER CENTER FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSpanish Oaks Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 47% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ELEVATE USA ↗
  • Who funds ELEVATE SAVANNAH ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds 450 BULL STREET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVANNAH MUSIC FESTIVALINC ↗
  • Who funds SAVANNAH TREE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDBANK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SAFE SHELTER CENTER FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Spanish Oaks Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Savannah Community Foundation IncGA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Savannah Community Foundation Inc · The Hodge Foundation Inc · John G Kennedy Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hunter Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hunter Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hunter Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Hunter Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hunter’s filings →

    More from the funding graph