Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hummel Family Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$181kPublic Benefit$129kArts & Culture$123kHealth$121kPhilanthropy$96kEnvironment$58kEducation$55kReligion$42kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YWCA GREENSBORO$20,000
NC MUSEUM OF ART FNDN$15,250
IMAGINE NC FIRST$10,000
UNITED WAY OF CHATHAM COUNTY$6,000
UW OF GREATER GSO$5,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
INSTITUTE FOR SOUTHERN STUDIES$5,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$2,000
SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER$2,000
FEARRINGTON CARES$1,500
FEARRINGTON VILLAGE SINGERS$1,490
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC$1,000
EL FUTURO$1,000
SOCIETY OF THE CINCINNATI OF VA$1,000
CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PERC INC: $13k → 9%PERC INC: $1k → 9%NC JUSTICE CENTER: $1k → 8%NC JUSTICE CENTER: $500 → 8%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 16%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 16%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 16%GUILFORD CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $500 → 16%INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 16%SANCTUARY HOUSE: $200 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
CT
CA
NE
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$810k · 108 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

108 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 76 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

108
149

Total granted

$810k
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+26%

Still filing today

63%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationHealthCivil RightsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IMAGINE NORTH CAROLINA FIRST
    5× · 2018–2025 · $95k · revenue +258%
  • NORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $51k · revenue +85%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • CE
    CLEAN ENERGY WORKSgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +112%
  • J(
    JDRF (GALA FUND-A-CURE)
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • NN
    NEW NORTH CAROLINA PROJECT FOUNDATI
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Carolina Conservation Network

The north carolina conservation network supports, trains, and coordinates diverse groups and directly advocates to achieve equitable and sustainable solutions for our environment.

Environment
2
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
3
North Carolina Chamber

The organization is a proactive, nonpartisan business advocacy organization. the organization works in the legislative, regulatory and political arenas to proactively drive positive change to ensure that north carolina is a leading place…

—
4
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
5
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
6
Nc Warn Inc

To tackle the accelerating crisis of climate change by working to transition nc to clean, efficient energy & by watch-dogging utility practices. we pursue this work through grassroots activism, technical analysis, legal challenges and…

Environment
7
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
8
The Georgia Center for Nonprofits

Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…

Community Improvement
9
United States Endowment for Forestry

The endowment works collaboratively with partners in the public and private sectors to advance systemic, transformative, and sustainable change for the health and vitality of the nation's working forests and forest reliant communities.

Environment
10
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
11
Greater Winston-Salem Development Corp

To recruit new businesses to winston-salem and forsyth county in order to facilitate growth and economic diversification in the area.

Community Improvement
12
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greensboro Housing Coalition Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Amnion Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 122 of the 263 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
27
Early backer (in before they grew)
120/122
Grantees still filing
87/122
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YWCA Greensboro: $165,496 · OtherYWCA GreensboroUNITED WAY OF GRTR GSO: $44,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GRTR GSOJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FUND: $42,900 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FUNDFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $40,150 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHJDRF: $21,650 · Other+142 more: $261,566 · Other+142 moreIMAGINE NORTH CAROLINA FIRST: $95,000 · Social ScienceIMAGINE NORT…Institute for Southern Studies Inc: $5,100 · Social Science+2 more: $2,450 · Social ScienceNORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION: $51,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH CARO…UNITED ARTS COUNCIL OF GREENSBORO INC: $20,100 · Arts & CultureUNITED ART…Nonprofit Information Networking Association: $6,000 · Arts & CultureNonprofit …THE SOCIETY OF THE CINCINNATI: $3,000 · Arts & Culture+9 more: $7,250 · Arts & Culture+9 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC: $36,600 · HealthMOSES H CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION: $8,000 · HealthEL FUTURO INC: $7,250 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $4,500 · HealthThe Amnion Foundation Inc: $4,000 · Health+4 more: $1,950 · HealthCLEAN ENERGY WORKS: $30,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $3,700 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,600 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $1,500 · Environment+6 more: $2,550 · EnvironmentUNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC: $21,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF CHATHAM COUNTY: $15,000 · PhilanthropyCrescent Rotary Club Foundation Inc: $3,300 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyMEREDITH COLLEGE: $7,500 · EducationWILLOW OAK MONTESSORI FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · EducationAlliance for Just Money Inc: $5,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationPUBLIC SCHOOLS FIRST NC: $2,700 · EducationBENNETT COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationSTUDENT ACTION WITH FARMWORKERS: $1,500 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY: $1,450 · EducationCHATHAM COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $1,250 · Education+4 more: $2,150 · Education
Other$575,762Social Science$102,550Arts & Culture$87,350Health$62,300Environment$40,350Philanthropy$40,300Education$34,050

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYWCA Greensboro: $165,496 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetIMAGINE NORTH CAROLINA FIRST: $95,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION: $51,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC: $36,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN ENERGY WORKS: $30,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC: $21,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED ARTS COUNCIL OF GREENSBORO INC: $20,100 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CHATHAM COUNTY: $15,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetP E R C INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFearrington Cares Inc: $9,005 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetMOSES H CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEREDITH COLLEGE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEL FUTURO INC: $7,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDemocracy North Carolina: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNonprofit Information Networking Association: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOMEWORD INC: $5,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWILLOW OAK MONTESSORI FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetInstitute for Southern Studies Inc: $5,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlliance for Just Money Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Amnion Foundation Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREENSBORO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $3,850 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $3,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF THE CINCINNATI: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $2,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC SCHOOLS FIRST NC: $2,700 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $2,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBENNETT COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINA THEATRE OF GREENSBORO INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUnited for A Fair Economy Inc: $2,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSTUDENT ACTION WITH FARMWORKERS: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $1,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINEQUALITY MEDIA: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $1,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREENSBORO CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $1,350 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,275 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHATHAM COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOULA ART MUSEUM: $1,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECT: $1,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRENCH BROAD RIVER ACADEMY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YWCA Greensboro ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINE NORTH CAROLINA FIRST ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN ENERGY WORKS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED ARTS COUNCIL OF GREENSBORO INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CHATHAM COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds P E R C INC ↗
  • Who funds Fearrington Cares Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOSES H CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MEREDITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EL FUTURO INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds Democracy North Carolina ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Nonprofit Information Networking Association ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWORD INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLOW OAK MONTESSORI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Southern Studies Inc ↗
  • Who funds Alliance for Just Money Inc ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro IncNC57.7× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc · The Cemala Foundation Inc · Hillsdale Fund · Foundation for the Carolinas · Dawn S Chaney Foundation · William a Stern Foundation · Well-Spring Retirement Community Inc · Griffin Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hummel Family Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hummel Family Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hummel Family Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Hummel Family Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 263 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hummel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph