Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Howard Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$335kHuman Services$49kReligion$41kHousing & Shelter$5kHealth$2kRecreation & Sports$2kEmployment$2kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $39k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hampden-Sydney College$22,500
The Child & Family Network Centers$16,000
Washington Schools For Girls$5,000
Belle Haven Cares Fund$5,000
Catholic Charities$2,500
Gonzaga College HS$1,000
The Campagna Center$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
Goodwin Living Found Hospice$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Belle Haven Cares Fund: $5k → 6%Alive: $500 → 9%The Campagna Center: $17k → 9%The Campagna Center: $8k → 9%The Campagna Center: $1k → 9%The Campagna Center: $1k → 9%The Campagna Center: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$391k · 17 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
21

Total granted

$391k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+14%

Still filing today

41%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $163k · revenue +76%
  • TC
    THE CHILD AND FAMILY NETWORK CENTERS INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +91%
  • TC
    THE CAMPAGNA CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • TU
    Trinity UMC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • TM
    The Mary Lead Us Campaign
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • SO
    SISTERS OF PROVIDENCE OF SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
2
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
3
Browne Academy

The Academy is a pre-kindergarten through grade eight independent school preparing girls and boys in the metropolitan Washington, DC area for competitive secondary schools. The Academy is a diverse independent day school committed to…

—
4
Capitol Hill Day School

Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…

Education
5
The Mclean School of Maryland Inc

Mclean school's small classes and abilities model prepare bright students in kindergarten through twelfth grade, including those with dyslexia, anxiety, and attention issues, for college success.

Education
6
Achievement Preparatory Academy Public Charter School

To prepare students to excel as high-achieving scholars and leaders in high school, college and beyond.

Education
7
Washington Leadership Academy Public Charter School

Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.

Education
8
Learn Dc Public Charter School

Provide students with the academic foundation and ambition to earn a college degree.

Education
9
Corporation of the Washington Latin School

To provide a rigorous, classical education to public school middle and high school students from across the district of columbia.

Education
10
Washington Tennis & Education Foundation

To build life champions by providing high quality academic, tennis and wellness instruction to low-income students in dc at-risk of academic failure.

Youth Development
11
Close Up Foundation

The mission of the nonprofit, nonpartisan close up foundation is to empower young people for a lifetime of active citizenship through civic education programs, professional development for educators, and classroom resources.

Arts & Culture
12
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Alexandria's Children; the most unlike its peers is For the Win Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE: $163,000 · EducationHAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGEWASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $70,000 · EducationWASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLSTHE CHILD AND FAMILY NETWORK CENTERS INC: $36,000 · EducationTHE CHILD AND FAMILY NETWORK CENTERS INCDUKE UNIVERSITY: $15,250 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTrinity UMC: $25,000 · OtherTrinity UMCGEORGETOWN VISITATION PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $25,000 · OtherGEORGETOWN VISITATION PREPARATO…Catholic Charities: $13,870 · OtherCatholic CharitiesCapitol Learning Academy Inc: $13,000 · OtherCapitol Learning Academy IncTrinity United Methodist Church: $9,000 · OtherTrinity United Methodist ChurchThe Mary Lead Us Campaign: $5,000 · OtherMckenna Center: $4,750 · Other+24 more: $26,190 · Other+24 moreTHE CAMPAGNA CENTER INC: $27,250 · Human ServicesBELLE HAVEN CARES FUND: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesYELLOW RIBBON FUND INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyACT FOR ALEXANDRIA: $1,000 · Community ImprovementTHE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionTHE CENTER FOR ALEXANDRIA'S CHILDREN: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Education$284,250Other$121,810Human Services$32,750Philanthropy$2,000Community Improvement$1,000Food & Nutrition$1,000Crime & Legal$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE: $163,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $70,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHILD AND FAMILY NETWORK CENTERS INC: $36,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CAMPAGNA CENTER INC: $27,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $15,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCapitol Learning Academy Inc: $13,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetYELLOW RIBBON FUND INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHANKS USA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACT FOR ALEXANDRIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ALEXANDRIA'S CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALEXANDRIA ROTARY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMove2Learn: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALIVE Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST COLETTA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOR THE WIN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD AND FAMILY NETWORK CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMPAGNA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Capitol Learning Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds BELLE HAVEN CARES FUND ↗
  • Who funds YELLOW RIBBON FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THANKS USA ↗
  • Who funds ACT FOR ALEXANDRIA ↗
  • Who funds THE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR ALEXANDRIA'S CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ALEXANDRIA ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Move2Learn ↗
  • Who funds ALIVE Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST COLETTA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR THE WIN INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC20.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Bruhn-Morris Family Foundation Inc · Act for Alexandria · Calvert and Sally Simmons Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Blackburn Foundation · The Herget Family Charitable Foundation · Move2Learn · Ivakota Assoc Inc · The Maple Tree Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Howard Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Howard Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Yellow Ribbon Fund Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Howard Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Howard Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Howard Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph