Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Howard & Marcia Owens Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$267k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$193k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.0MEducation$135kHealth$130kRecreation & Sports$18kHuman Services$18kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $243k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RED BULL THEATER INC$192,750
YALE UNIVERSITY$50,000
FOUNTAIN HOUSE$10,000
HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC$2,500
ASTORIA FOOD PANTRY$2,500
HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND$2,500
PROJECT CUDDLE INC$2,500
ALLEGHENY COLLEGE$2,500
MCC THEATER$1,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $3k → 14%PROJECT CUDDLE INC: $3k → 10%ASTORIA FOOD PANTRY: $3k → 13%HAMILTON COLLEGE: $3k → 16%SWISH: $5k → 17%HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND: $3k → 12%HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND: $3k → 12%HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC: $15k → 11%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $3k → 14%PROJECT CUDDLE INC: $3k → 10%HAMILTON COLLEGE: $3k → 16%SWISH: $3k → 17%HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND: $3k → 12%HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND: $3k → 12%HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $15k → 11%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $3k → 14%PROJECT CUDDLE INC: $3k → 10%HAMILTON COLLEGE: $3k → 16%RED BULL THEATER INC: $250k → 17%HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND: $3k → 12%HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND: $3k → 12%HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $15k → 11%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $3k → 14%PROJECT CUDDLE: $3k → 10%HAMILTON COLLEGE: $3k → 16%RED BULL THEATER INC: $193k → 17%HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND: $3k → 12%HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC: $3k → 11%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $3k → 14%PROJECT CUDDLE: $3k → 10%HAMILTON COLLEGE: $3k → 16%RED BULL THEATER INC: $183k → 17%HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC: $3k → 11%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $3k → 14%PROJECT CUDDLE INC: $3k → 10%HAMILTON COLLEGE: $3k → 16%RED BULL THEATER INC: $150k → 17%HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC: $3k → 11%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $3k → 14%RED BULL THEATER INC: $150k → 17%RED BULL THEATER INC: $50k → 17%RED BULL THEATER INC: $50k → 17%FOUNTAIN HOUSE: $30k → 17%FOUNTAIN HOUSE: $25k → 17%FOUNTAIN HOUSE: $25k → 17%FOUNTAIN HOUSE: $25k → 17%FOUNTAIN HOUSE: $15k → 17%FOUNTAIN HOUSE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 7 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$1.3M
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+119%

Still filing today

86%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RB
    RED BULL THEATER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +22%
  • FH
    FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $130k · revenue +101%
  • HI
    HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2025 · $50k
  • AF
    ASTORIA FOOD PANTRY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $3k · revenue +119%
  • MC
    MANHATTAN CLASS COMPANY INC
    one grant, 2025 · $1k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
2
The New School

The new school's mission is to prepare our students to understand, contribute to, and succeed in a rapidly changing society, and thus make the world a better and more just place. (continued on schedule o)

Education
3
Molloy University

Molloy university, an independent catholic university, rooted in the dominican tradition of study, spirituality, service, and community, is committed to academic excellence with respect for each person. through transformative education,…

Education
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
University of Hartford

Dedicated to learning, personal growth, knowledge creation, and the betterment of society. the university engages students in aquiring the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to thrive in and contribute to a pluralistic, complex world.

Education
6
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
7
Marymount Manhattan College

Marymount manhattan college is an urban, independent, liberal arts college (see schedule o).

Education
8
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
9
Wellesley College

To provide an excellent liberal arts education for women who will make a difference in the world.

Education
10
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
11
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
12
Macalester College

Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is High Mountain Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Cuddle Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RED BULL THEATER INC: $1,025,500 · Arts & CultureRED BULL THEATER INC+1 more: $1,300 · Arts & CultureFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC: $130,000 · HealthFOUNTAIN HO…HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC: $52,500 · EducationALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $17,500 · EducationTrustees of Hamilton College: $15,000 · EducationYALE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherPROJECT CUDDLE INC: $17,500 · OtherSWISH: $7,500 · OtherHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $17,500 · Recreation & SportsASTORIA FOOD PANTRY INC: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Arts & Culture$1,026,800Health$130,000Education$85,000Other$75,000Recreation & Sports$17,500Food & Nutrition$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRED BULL THEATER INC: $1,025,500 over 7y, 18% of budgetFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC: $130,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC: $52,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $17,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT CUDDLE INC: $17,500 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $17,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Hamilton College: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTAN CLASS COMPANY INC: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RED BULL THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT CUDDLE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGHENY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Hamilton College ↗
  • Who funds ASTORIA FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTAN CLASS COMPANY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Howard & Marcia Owens Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Howard & Marcia Owens Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Howard & Marcia Owens’ filings →

    More from the funding graph