Skip to content
The House of the Good Shepherd Foundation Inc at a glance

· Public charity

The House of the Good Shepherd Foundation Inc

The foundation shall work in partnership with the house of the good shepherd board of directors and staff to promote and raise philanthropic funds to enhance services for the residents and staff of the house of the good shepherd lifecare community.

$55k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$543kArts & Culture$35kHealth$28kEducation$22kReligion$17k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$55,083
Median grant
1
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD$55,083
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 4%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 4%HUNTERDON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $8k → 4%ST JOHN THE BAPTIST FOUNDATION: $9k → 4%THE HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $350k → 7%ST JOHN THE BAPTIST FOUNDATION: $8k → 4%THE HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $55k → 7%THE HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $50k → 7%THE HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $50k → 7%THE HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $33k → 7%CENTENARY STAGE COMPANY: $15k → 7%CENTENARY STAGE COMPANY: $15k → 7%CENTENARY COLLEGE: $12k → 7%FOUNDATION FOR HMC: $5k → 7%CENTENARY UNIVERSITY: $5k → 7%HACKETTSTOWN COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%CENTENARY COLLEGE: $5k → 7%ABILITIES OF NORTHWEST NJ: $5k → 7%DOMESTIC ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER OF WARREN COUNTY: $5k → 7%THE ARCWARREN COUNTY CHAPTER INC: $5k → 7%RUTHERFURD HALL FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$617k · 4 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$617k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+30%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationHealthArts & CultureEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD
    5× · 2017–2022 · $538k · revenue -51%
  • CU
    CENTENARY UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $52k · revenue -13%
  • SJ
    ST JOHN THE BAPTIST FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $17k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • HH
    HUNTERDON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue -65%
  • ABILITIES OF NORTHWEST JERSEY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +30%
  • DA
    DOMESTIC ABUSE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER OF WARREN COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hebrew Health Care Inc

The mission of hebrew health care is to provide highly personalized quality programs and services to the seniors of our community. we assure dignified, informed, quality care to all regardless of source of payment for services. (see…

Health
2
The Arc of Hunterdon County

The arc of hunterdon county supports and empowers individuals experiencing intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families. the agency enables those it supports to live and work in the community on their own terms as proud,…

—
3
The Foundation for Health Care Continuums

The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.

Health
4
United Methodist Homes of New Jersey

Compassionately serving in community so that all are free to choose abundant life.

Human Services
5
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
6
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
7
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
8
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
9
Skagit Hospice Foundation

To fund the program and services of hospice of the nothwest to ensure dignified and compassionate care is available to anyone coping with a life-limiting diagnosis.one size doesn't always fit all, especially when it comes to quality of…

Health
10
St Joseph Care Center

To help residents live to their fullest potential, recognizing the changing needs of each person.

Health
11
Hmh Hospitals Corporation

The organization is committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…

Health
12
Conway Hospital Community Services

Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc Warren County Chapter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rutherfurd Hall Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $537,768 · OtherTHE HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD+4 more: $37,100 · Other+4 moreCENTENARY UNIVERSITY: $52,000 · EducationCENTENARY…HUNTERDON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $8,130 · HealthABILITIES OF NORTHWEST JERSEY INC: $5,250 · EmploymentRUTHERFURD HALL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$574,868Education$52,000Health$8,130Employment$5,250Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $537,768 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetCENTENARY UNIVERSITY: $52,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN THE BAPTIST FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetFoundation for Hackettstown Medical Center: $10,100 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetHUNTERDON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $8,130 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABILITIES OF NORTHWEST JERSEY INC: $5,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOMESTIC ABUSE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER OF WARREN COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ARC WARREN COUNTY CHAPTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Atlantic Health Syste…John a and Margaret P…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Atlantic Health System Inc Group ReturnNJ15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Atlantic Health System Inc Group Return · John a and Margaret Post Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The House of the Good Shepherd Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The House of the Good Shepherd Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Abilities of Northwest Jersey Inc: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The House of the Good Shepherd Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The House of the Good Shepherd Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on House of the Good Shepherd’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home