Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hottle Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$138kEducation$68kFood & Nutrition$46kArts & Culture$37kHuman Services$3kHealth$2kEnvironment$975Recreation & Sports$750Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $34k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$433k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SYDENSTRICKER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$33,628
LYCOMING COLLEGE$7,425
SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT$6,225
WALNUT HILL SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS$4,160
NO KID HUNGRY$2,807
UVA$2,500
GREENSPRING ACADEMY OF MUSIC$2,000
WTMD$1,500
SKIDMORE COLLEGE$1,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$528
K9S FOR WARRIORS$500
RIVERSDALE HISTORICAL SOCIETY$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROTECT THE GROMS: $100 → 11%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$240k · 15 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
25

Total granted

$240k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+33%

Still filing today

47%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LYCOMING COLLEGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +27%
  • WH
    WALNUT HILL CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $22k · revenue +18%
  • SC
    SKIDMORE COLLEGE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • UM
    UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $34k
  • JF
    JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +160%
  • RH
    RISING HOPE
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
Washington College

Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.core valueswe share these values of our founding patron, george washington: integrity, determination, curiosity, civility,…

Education
8
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
10
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
11
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
12
Health and Environmental Sciences Institute

The health and environmental sciences institute (hesi) is a nonprofit institution whose mission is to engage scientists from academia, government, industry, nonprofit, and other research institutions to identify and resolve global health…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Protect the Groms. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SYDENSTRICKER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $101,553 · OtherSYDENSTRICKER UNITED METHODIST CHURCHUNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $33,908 · OtherUNITED METHODIST CHURCHSOME INC: $31,558 · OtherSOME INCUVA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherSKIDMORE COLLEGE AWC: $9,500 · Other+25 more: $39,948 · Other+25 moreLYCOMING COLLEGE: $26,143 · EducationLYCOMING COLLEGEWALNUT HILL CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $22,060 · EducationWALNUT HILL CENTER F…SKIDMORE COLLEGE: $6,300 · EducationSKIDMORE COLLEGE+1 more: $400 · EducationCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $10,200 · Food & NutritionJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $2,500 · Arts & CultureSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MARYLAND ANTIQUITIES INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureUKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Arts & CultureFOOD FOR OTHERS INC: $1,030 · Human ServicesProtect the Groms: $100 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $923 · HealthOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $500 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $375 · Environment
Other$226,467Education$54,903Food & Nutrition$10,200Arts & Culture$4,500Human Services$1,130Health$923Environment$875

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOME INC: $31,558 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLYCOMING COLLEGE: $26,143 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWALNUT HILL CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $22,060 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $10,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE: $6,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $2,807 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRISING HOPE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $1,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MARYLAND ANTIQUITIES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERSDALE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $1,100 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetFOOD FOR OTHERS INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $923 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC: $665 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SENTENCING PROJECT: $375 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds LYCOMING COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WALNUT HILL CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds RISING HOPE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MARYLAND ANTIQUITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSDALE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR OTHERS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hottle Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hottle Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 50%
  • Society for the Preservation of Maryland Antiquities Inc: 50% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hottle Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph