Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Horner Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$300k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$73k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$1.1MYouth Development$726kArts & Culture$307kHealth$292kRecreation & Sports$283kPhilanthropy$281kEducation$254kScience & Tech$216kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $207k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $73k
$12,860
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VICTORIA FOUNDATION$72,500
Individual grant recipient$33,729
ACTA NON VERBA YOUTH URBAN FARM PROJECT$30,000
OAKLAND LACROSSE CLUB$30,000
HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA$30,000
DAVENTRY VOLUNTEER CENTRE$20,238
PHILADELPHIA ROBOTICS COALITION INC$20,000
BLACK GIRLS LOVE MATH$20,000
AFRICAN YOUTH ARISE (AYA)$12,860
FOODCORPS$10,000
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$8,100
JEFF KORNBLAU PARTNERS FOR PATIENT ADVOCACY TA JKPPA$5,000
URBAN ADAMAH$2,500
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH$2,500
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$625
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 55% of grant dollars ($2.1M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 45% that went abroad ($1.8M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $195k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OAKLAND LACROSSE CLUB: $33k → 10%OAKLAND LACROSSE CLUB: $30k → 10%OAKLAND LACROSSE CLUB: $30k → 10%OAKLAND LACROSSE CLUB: $30k → 10%AFGHAN COLIATION: $3k → 10%GIRLS JUSTICE LEAGUE: $15k → 22%GIRLS JUSTICE LEAGUE: $15k → 22%THE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $20k → 22%THE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $20k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
MD
DC
AL

Beyond the US: 45% of all-years giving ($1.8M)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$1.1M · 69 grants
United Kingdom$691k · 35 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of The Horner Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 29% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 27%.

The Horner Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 45% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 72 repeat orgs$509k to everyone else

72 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 59 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

72
53

Total granted

$3.4M
$488k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+18%

Still filing today

51%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    ACTA NON VERBA YOUTH URBAN FARM PROJECT
    7× · 2019–2025 · $185k · revenue +257%
  • OL
    Oakland Lacrosse Club
    4× · 2022–2025 · $123k · revenue +14%
  • UT
    Urban Tilth
    5× · 2017–2022 · $81k · revenue ×12

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $80k
  • PB
    PHAT BEETS GROWING TOGETHER CO C-PREP
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • CU
    COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE IN OAKLAND
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
2
Philadelphia Academy of School Leaders Inc

We develop, engage, and retain principals and system leaders who transform schools, dramatically improve student outcomes, and drive systemic change to prepare all philadelphia students for college, career, and life.

Education
3
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
4
Public Trust

Public Trust is a non-profit organization on the campus of the University of Pennsylvania that fosters learning, creativity, and collaboration in support of justice and equality.

Arts & Culture
5
The Public School of Germantown

Germantown academy inspires students to be independent in thought; confident in expression; compassionate in spirit; collaborative in action; and honorable in deed. germantown academy is a private school educating students from pre-k…

Education
6
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
Philadelphia Youth Network Inc

Philadelphia youth network (pyn) equips young people to build lifelong skills, pursue meaningful careers, and embrace change with confidence - so they can thrive in the workforce, experience economic mobility, and strengthen their…

Youth Development
9
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
10
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
11
Philadelphia Youth Sports Collaborative

The mission of philadelphia youth sports collaborative (pysc) is to dramatically enhance the capacity of youth-serving organizations in philadelphia to provide high quality, sports-based youth development programs to children in every…

Philanthropy
12
Girls Inc of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

Our mission is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart and bold through direct service and advocacy. in partnership with schools and at our girls inc. center, we focus on the development of the whole girl. she learns to value herself,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Philadelphia Education Fund; the most unlike its peers is Urban Tilth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/66
Grantees still filing
39/66
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VICTORIA FOUNDATION: $222,050 · OtherVICTORIA FOUNDATIONVICTORIA COMMUNITY FOOD HUB SOCIETY FISCAL AGENT: $220,197 · OtherVICTORIA COMMUNITY FOOD HUB SOCIETY FISCAL AGENTVICTORIA COMMUNITY FOOD HUB SOCIETY: $128,000 · OtherVICTORIA COMMUNITY FOOD HUB SOCIETYDOWNTOWN BLANSHARD ADVISORY COMMITTEE: $113,504 · OtherDAVENTRY VOLUNTEER CENTRE: $95,438 · OtherPEN GREEN CENTRE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $88,354 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $80,069 · Other+86 more: $1,408,919 · Other+86 moreACTA NON VERBA YOUTH URBAN FARM PROJECT: $185,000 · Youth DevelopmentACTA NON VERBA …BAY AREA GIRLS ROCK CAMP: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentBAY AREA GIRLS …YOUTH MENTORING PARTNERSHIP: $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH MENTORING…Gaia Passages: $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentGaia PassagesSTUDENTS RUN PHILLY STYLE: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentSTUDENTS RUN PH…THE PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION FUND: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PHILADELPHI…+5 more: $50,500 · Youth Development+5 moreTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $80,000 · Arts & CulturePLAY ON PHILLY: $60,000 · Arts & CultureWHYY INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureARDEN THEATRE COMPANY: $45,000 · Arts & CultureLiveConnectionsorg: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CulturePhiladelphia Robotics Coalition Inc: $80,000 · EducationHEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA: $60,000 · EducationBLACK GIRLS LOVE MATH: $40,000 · EducationCODED BY: $40,000 · Education+5 more: $9,000 · EducationUrban Tilth: $80,500 · EnvironmentUrban Adamah: $69,000 · EnvironmentPlanting Justice: $60,000 · EnvironmentECOLOGY CENTER: $14,912 · Environment+1 more: $500 · EnvironmentOakland Lacrosse Club: $122,500 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $40,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS JUSTICE LEAGUE: $30,000 · Human Services+2 more: $4,350 · Human ServicesBicycle Coalition Of Greater Philadelphia: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsSQUASHSMARTS INC: $40,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,356,531Youth Development$550,500Arts & Culture$266,000Education$229,000Environment$224,912Human Services$196,850Recreation & Sports$91,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACTA NON VERBA YOUTH URBAN FARM PROJECT: $185,000 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetOakland Lacrosse Club: $122,500 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetUrban Tilth: $80,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetPhiladelphia Robotics Coalition Inc: $80,000 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBAY AREA GIRLS ROCK CAMP: $75,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetYOUTH MENTORING PARTNERSHIP: $70,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetGaia Passages: $70,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetUrban Adamah: $69,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetPHILADELPHIA YOUNG PLAYWRIGHTS: $65,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetPLAY ON PHILLY: $60,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetHEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA: $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPlanting Justice: $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWHYY INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBicycle Coalition Of Greater Philadelphia: $50,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetARDEN THEATRE COMPANY: $45,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBLACK GIRLS LOVE MATH: $40,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetCODED BY: $40,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION FUND: $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $40,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLiveConnectionsorg: $30,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCRADLE OF LIBERTY COUNCIL 525 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS JUSTICE LEAGUE: $30,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetUniversity City Science Center: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOODCORPS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBeat The Streets Inc: $17,500 over 1y, 24% of budgetPhiladelphia Youth Action Inc: $17,500 over 1y, 75% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $16,785 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetECOLOGY CENTER: $14,912 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NJ: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPartnership for Children & Youth: $7,431 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FORUM FOR YOUTH INVESTMENT: $5,032 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJeff Kornblau Partners For Patient Advocacy: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Peddie School: $4,875 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPHILANTHROPY NETWORK GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $4,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAFGHAN COALITION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCTC WELLNESS FOUNDATION: $1,875 over 2y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ACTA NON VERBA YOUTH URBAN FARM PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Oakland Lacrosse Club ↗
  • Who funds Urban Tilth ↗
  • Who funds Philadelphia Robotics Coalition Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA GIRLS ROCK CAMP ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH MENTORING PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Gaia Passages ↗
  • Who funds Urban Adamah ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA YOUNG PLAYWRIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds PLAY ON PHILLY ↗
  • Who funds HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds Planting Justice ↗
  • Who funds STUDENTS RUN PHILLY STYLE ↗
  • Who funds WHYY INC ↗
  • Who funds Bicycle Coalition Of Greater Philadelphia ↗
  • Who funds ARDEN THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds BLACK GIRLS LOVE MATH ↗
  • Who funds SQUASHSMARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds CODED BY ↗
  • Who funds THE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA42.3× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · The Barra Foundation Inc · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Lenfest Foundation Inc · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · The Allen Hilles Fund · Independence Foundation · Connelly Foundation · Children Can Shape the Future Inc · The Cigna Group Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Horner Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Horner Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Foodcorps Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Mcdaniel College Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Horner Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Horner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 132 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Horner’s filings →

More from the funding graph