How much did THE HOPKINTON COUNTRY CLUB CHARITABLE FO grant in FY2025?

THE HOPKINTON COUNTRY CLUB CHARITABLE FO reported 3 grants totaling $135,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is THE HOPKINTON COUNTRY CLUB CHARITABLE FO based?

THE HOPKINTON COUNTRY CLUB CHARITABLE FO is based in MA.

THE HOPKINTON COUNTRY CLUB CHARITABLE FO

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

THE HOPKINTON COUNTRY CLUB CHARITABLE FO

The hopkinton cc charitable foundation seeks to empower youth and families in our local communities by supporting youth development and economic assistance programs serving those with the greatest needs.

$136k

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$20k

Largest

01What you fund

0171% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2025.

Philanthropy$118kHuman Services$98kHealth$47kEducation$43kFood & Nutrition$35kReligion$28kHousing & Shelter$27kCommunity Improvement$19kArts & Culture$8kOther$173k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

socialeveryonefindchallengedfood securitychildrenactivities

2022

trainingachieveeveryonefindfood securitychildrenfoster

2023

exempt interestend hungerfood insecuritychildrenrespectfosterdiverse

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$13k

Total assets

Largest grants

FOUNDATION FOR METROWEST$20,000
MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIVE$10,000
NATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INC$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$527k · 16 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +59% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$527k

$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%

+59%

Still filing today

88%

75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesPhilanthropyEducationFood & NutritionHealthReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FF
FOUNDATION FOR METROWEST
5× · 2021–2025 · $80k · revenue +67%
NS
NATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INC
5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +128%
MH
MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIVE
5× · 2021–2025 · $47k · revenue +8642%

Funded once

NP
NATIVITY PREPgraduated
one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +59%
GI
GIRLS INC OF WORCESTER
one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -26%
JA
JOHN ANDREW MAZIE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue -82%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Open Pantry of Greater Lowell Inc

The mission of The Open Pantry is to relieve hunger in our community. We aim to connect people to a variety of filling, nutritious, and culturally-appropriate food as well as to other community resources; to advocate on behalf of those in…

—

Medway Village Food Pantry Inc

The medway village food pantry is a 100% choice pantry serving over 2,500 children, adults, and seniors in metrowest ma.

Food & Nutrition

Round Table Inc

Provides structural and educational activities for low income youth and families in Boston. Builds, grows and maintains urban gardens with fresh vegetables for low income community.

Youth Development

The Gray House Inc

The mission of the gray house is to help its neighbors facing hardships to meet their immediate and transitional needs by providing food, clothing, and educational services in a safe, positive environment in the north end of springfield.

—

The Family Pantry- Damien's Place

Providing food and meals to the residents of greater new bedford and greater wareham metropolitan areas and surrounding towns.

Human Services

Rachel's Table

The mission of rachel's table of western massachusetts (rtwm) is to alleviate hunger and reduce the waste of food resources in wm. rtwm takes a holistic and collaborative approach toward food security by supporting an intergenerational…

Food & Nutrition

Belmont Food Pantry Inc

To provide food and assistance for residents of belmont, massachusetts who feel compelled to ask for food and/or assistance. the sole activity of the organization is to operate a food pantry run exclusively by volunteers in the town.

Food & Nutrition

Hinsdale Food Pantry Inc

Provide food and personal care items for individuals and families in need, living in hinsdale, massachusetts and local towns. the organization strives to collaborate with local community members, leaders, and businesses to alleviate food…

Food & Nutrition

Our Daily Bread Mansfield Food

The organization's primary purpose is to provide free food to residents of mansfield, massachusetts who are in need of food relief.

Food & Nutrition

Berkshire Food Project Inc

To alleviate hunger, food insecurity and social isolation by serving healthy and dignified noontime meals every weekday by providing education in making good, nutritional choices and by helping people access food resources

Food & Nutrition

Greater Boston Food Bank Inc

The greater boston food bank's mission is to end hunger in eastern massachusetts.

—

Bedford Community Table-Pantry Inc

To fight food insecurity and honor the dignity of all community members by supporting food assistance efforts in and around Bedford, MA.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise Metrowest Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bethany Hill Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1/24

the rest of the field

1,358/14,782

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/21

Grantees still filing

15/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$226,000Philanthropy$117,500Human Services$98,000Health$46,500Education$43,000Food & Nutrition$35,000Religion$27,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation ForMA28.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation For · Middlesex Savings Charitable · Metrowest Health Foundation Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · The Roessner Family Foundation Inc · MutualOne Charitable Foundation · Avidia Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · DCU for Kids

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE HOPKINTON COUNTRY CLUB CHARITABLE FO funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

12get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: JOHN ANDREW MAZIE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 232912197 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on JOHN ANDREW MAZIE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 20% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Hopkinton Country Club Charitable Fo?

Find your warmest path to The Hopkinton Country Club Charitable Fo through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE HOPKINTON COUNTRY CLUB CHARITABLE FO

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Hopkinton Country Club Charitable Fo?

More from the funding graph

THE HOPKINTON COUNTRY CLUB CHARITABLE FO

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Hopkinton Country Club Charitable Fo?

More from the funding graph