Skip to content
The Hopkinton Country Club Charitable Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Hopkinton Country Club Charitable Foundation Inc

The hopkinton cc charitable foundation seeks to empower youth and families in our local communities by supporting youth development and economic assistance programs serving those with the greatest needs.

$180k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of The Hopkinton Country Club Charitable Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Foundation For Metrowest Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year The Hopkinton Country Club Charitable Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $113k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

15
’21
14
’22
15
’23
12
’24
2
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$205kPhilanthropy$80kFood & Nutrition$73kEducation$68kHousing & Shelter$61kHealth$47kCrime & Legal$28kYouth Development$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $112,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $180,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $67,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$13k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION FOR METROWEST$15,000
NATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INC$10,000
MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIVE$10,000
NATIVITY PREP$10,000
DANIEL'S TABLE INC$7,500
CHILDREN ACROSS AMERICA INC$7,500
DIGNITY MATTERS INC$7,500
CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL BOSTON$7,500
POST 22$7,500
BETHANY HILL PLACE INC$7,500
PLUGGED IN BAND$7,500
DAILY BREAD FOOD PANTRY$7,500
PROJECT JUST BECAUSE INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%POST 22: $8k → 11%RISE ABOVE FOUNDATIONS INC: $10k → 11%RISE ABOVE FOUNDATIONS INC: $10k → 11%RISE ABOVE FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 11%PROJECT JUST BECAUSE INC: $9k → 8%DIGNITY MATTERS INC: $9k → 8%PROJECT JUST BECAUSE INC: $8k → 8%DIGNITY MATTERS INC: $8k → 8%PROJECT JUST BECAUSE: $8k → 8%DIGNITY MATTERS INC: $8k → 8%DIGNITY MATTERS INC: $8k → 8%PROJECT JUST BECAUSE INC: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$447k · 15 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$447k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-14%

Still filing today

87%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +134%
  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIVE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $47k · revenue +301%
  • BH
    BETHANY HILL PLACE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $34k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF WORCESTER
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -14%
  • JA
    JOHN ANDREW MAZIE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue -34%
  • OT
    OPEN TABLE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +58%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Upward Project

To provide low income, first generation students who attend selective colleges the skills and resources they need to succeed in college and graduate prepared for careers in competitive and high wage fields. To seek upward mobility for…

Education
2
Waltham Partnership for Youth Inc

Waltham partnership for youth collaborates with youth, families, and partner organizations to address long-standing systemic inequities while building a community of belonging and opportunity for waltham youth. we envision a world where…

Human Services
3
Medway Village Food Pantry Inc

The medway village food pantry is a 100% choice pantry serving over 2,500 children, adults, and seniors in metrowest ma. each week clients may choose from a wide variety of items including fresh produce, eggs, cheese, shelf-stable foods,…

Food & Nutrition
4
Minds Matter of Boston Inc

Minds matter connects driven and determined students from low-income families with the people, preparation, and possibilities to succeed in college, create their future, and change the world.

Youth Development
5
Massachusetts Avenue Project Inc

The mission of Massachusetts Avenue Project is to nurture the growth of a diverse and equitable community food system and promote local economic opportunities, access to affordable, nutritious food and social-change education.

Human Services
6
Merrimack Valley Food Bank Inc

The focus of the merrimack valley food bank is to help meet a person's most profound need - adequate nutrition and freedom from hunger. only through cooperative efforts can society initiate change, develop strategies to alleviate hunger,…

Food & Nutrition
7
Familyaid Boston Inc

Familyaid boston empowers parents and caregivers facing homelessness to secure and sustain housing and build strong foundations for their children's futures.

—
8
Sojourner House Inc

Sojourner house is a shelter of hope for families;providing a circle of support and empowering them towards independence.

Housing & Shelter
9
Community Cooks Inc

Community cooks mobilizes individuals, businesses, civic educational and faith-based groups to prepare home-cooked food for vulnerable populations seeking assistance from human service agencies throughout greater boston. the agency…

Food & Nutrition
10
Digital Ready Inc

Digital Ready activates the creative potential of young adults, especially low-income residents, to build tangible pathways to economic opportunities in Boston's innovation economy.

Education
11
Toward Independent Living & Learning Inc

Till is a private, not-for-profit human service agency established to develop and provide programs and services to meet the needs of individuals with developmental disabilities, mental illness, physical handicaps, emotional problems and…

—
12
The Open Pantry of Greater Lowell Inc

The mission of The Open Pantry is to relieve hunger in our community. We aim to connect people to a variety of filling, nutritious, and culturally-appropriate food as well as to other community resources; to advocate on behalf of those in…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise Metrowest Inc; the most unlike its peers is Daily Bread Food Pantry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INC: $50,000 · OtherNATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INCCHILDREN ACROSS AMERICA: $37,500 · OtherCHILDREN ACROSS AMERICAWHOLE CHILD INC: $19,000 · OtherWHOLE CHILD INCFRIENDS OF THE HOPKINTON SENIORS INC: $16,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE HOPKINTON SENIORS INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WORCESTER: $15,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WORCES…NATIVITY-BOSTON INC: $10,000 · OtherGIRLS INCORPORATED OF WORCESTER: $10,000 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE METROWEST INC: $26,500 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE METROWEST INCNATICK SERVICE COUNCIL INC: $19,000 · OtherNATICK SERVICE COUNCIL INC+3 more: $22,500 · Other+3 moreCommunity Foundation for MetroWest Inc: $80,000 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation f…DAILY BREAD FOOD PANTRY INC: $37,500 · PhilanthropyDAILY BREAD FOOD PANTR…Project Just Because Inc: $31,500 · Human ServicesProject Just Becau…Dignity Matters Inc: $31,500 · Human ServicesDignity Matters In…RISE ABOVE FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 · Human ServicesRISE ABOVE FOUNDAT…POST 22 TRAINING & EMPLOYMENT FOR DISABLED ADULTS INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesPOST 22 TRAINING &…MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIVE INC: $46,500 · HealthBETHANY HILL PLACE: $34,000 · EducationJOHN ANDREW MAZIE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · EducationDANIEL'S TABLE INC: $27,500 · Food & NutritionOPEN TABLE INC: $7,500 · Food & NutritionStraight Ahead Ministries INC: $27,500 · Religion
Other$226,000Philanthropy$117,500Human Services$98,000Health$46,500Education$43,000Food & Nutrition$35,000Religion$27,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommunity Foundation for MetroWest Inc: $80,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIVE INC: $46,500 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetDAILY BREAD FOOD PANTRY INC: $37,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetBETHANY HILL PLACE: $34,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetProject Just Because Inc: $31,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDignity Matters Inc: $31,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetStraight Ahead Ministries INC: $27,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDANIEL'S TABLE INC: $27,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetRISE ABOVE FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE METROWEST INC: $26,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNATICK SERVICE COUNCIL INC: $19,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HOPKINTON SENIORS INC: $16,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WORCESTER: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVITY-BOSTON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF WORCESTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJOHN ANDREW MAZIE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetPLUGGED IN BAND PROGRAM INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPOST 22 TRAINING & EMPLOYMENT FOR DISABLED ADULTS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetOPEN TABLE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Middlesex Savings Cha…Community Foundation …Boston Foundation IncMetrowest Health Foun…The Roessner Family F…The Sudbury FoundationAvidia Charitable Fou…Eastern Bank Foundati…Cummings Foundation G…Arbella Insurance Fou…MutualOne Charitable …DCU for Kids
Middlesex Savings Charitable Foundation IncMA30.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Middlesex Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Metrowest Health Foundation Inc · The Roessner Family Foundation Inc · The Sudbury Foundation · Avidia Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Arbella Insurance Foundation · MutualOne Charitable Foundation · DCU for Kids

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hopkinton Country Club Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hopkinton Country Club Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Straight Ahead Ministries Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Rise Above Foundation Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Open Table Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Girls Incorporated of Worcester: 2% of income from government
  • Project Just Because Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hopkinton Country Club Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Hopkinton Country Club Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hopkinton Country Club’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home