Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hope and Tom Reynolds Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$15k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Hope and Tom Reynolds Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Bank Of America Charitable Gift Fd, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year The Hope and Tom Reynolds Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $33k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
17
3
18
2
19
5
20
3
21
5
22
2
23
4
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$148kPhilanthropy$129kHuman Services$21kRecreation & Sports$11kReligion$8kHealth$8kAnimals$8kCrime & Legal$6kOther$0
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k5 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Georgetown University$15,000
Jesuit Refugee Service USA$10,000
Reading Between The Lines$2,500
Aids Foundation of Chicago$2,000
Chicago Botanic Garden$1,000
GOLF$1,000
Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MADONNA MISSION: $1k → 14%Madonna Mission: $1k → 14%MADONNA MISSION: $500 → 14%Madonna Mission: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$180k · 10 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +259% since the first grant, against +59% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$180k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+259%
+59%

Still filing today

40%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentCrime & LegalHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $117k · revenue +16%
  • MM
    Madonna Mission
    4× · 2018–2024 · $8k · revenue +387%
  • TC
    THE CHICAGO BAR FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2024 · $4k · revenue +259%

Funded once

  • CC
    Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -5%
  • WH
    WINNETKA HOCKEY CLUB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +59%
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +95%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

3
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
4
Rockford University

To educate men & women to lead responsible lives by means of a curriculum grounded in liberal arts learning and complemented and extended by professional and practical experience, through the total academic and co-curricular experience,…

Education
5
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
6
Chicago Municipal Employee's Credit Union

To give members the ability to control their financial destiny by providing members with the means to satisfy their needs for financial services in a comfortable family-like environment. in doing so, the credit union strives to maintain…

7
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
8
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
9
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
10
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
11
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
12
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Chicago Bar Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Reading Between the Lines Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD — $128,829 · PhilanthropyBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD+1 more — $2,500 · PhilanthropyGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $116,622 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY+3 more — $4,500 · EducationLOYOLA ACADEMY — $30,000 · OtherLOYOLA ACADEMYJESUIT REFUGEE SERVICE USA — $10,000 · OtherJESUIT REFUGEE SERVICE …Operation White Stork — $7,500 · OtherOperation White StorkGOLF — $4,500 · OtherGOLFGOLF-GREATER ORGANIZATION FOR THE LESS FORTUNATE — $3,500 · OtherMisericordia — $3,500 · OtherCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties — $3,000 · OtherMemorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center — $3,000 · OtherWINNETKA HOCKEY CLUB INC — $2,500 · Other+4 more — $5,000 · Other+4 moreMadonna Mission — $7,500 · Human ServicesCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $5,500 · EnvironmentREADING BETWEEN THE LINES NFP — $2,500 · Crime & LegalAIDS Foundation of Chicago — $2,000 · HealthGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$131,329Education$121,122Other$72,500Human Services$7,500Environment$5,500Crime & Legal$2,500Health$2,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD — $128,829 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $116,622 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMadonna Mission — $7,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO BAR FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREADING BETWEEN THE LINES NFP — $2,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWINNETKA HOCKEY CLUB INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS Foundation of Chicago — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLENWOOD ACADEMY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hope and Tom Reynolds Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hope and Tom Reynolds Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Hope and Tom Reynolds Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph