Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hickerson Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$295k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Animals$735kArts & Culture$405kHuman Services$55kEnvironment$5k
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $160k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $135k
$40,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Montpelier Foundation$135,000
Individual grant recipient$45,000
The Boykin Spaniel Society$40,000
Hope's Legacy Equine Rescue$35,000
Madison Greene Humane Society$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Service Dogs of Virginia: $15k → 8%Service Dogs of Virginia: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 11 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against +88% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$1.1M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+88%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MONTPELIER FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $405k · revenue +82%
  • BS
    BOYKIN SPANIEL SOCIETY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $292k · revenue +40%
  • FS
    FAUQUIER SPCA INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • SD
    Service Dogs of VA
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • BS
    BOYKIN SPANIEL RESCUE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +88%
  • OS
    OC Sheriff's Prog K9
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Old Dominion Humane Society

Old Dominion Humane Society provides well-matched, permanent homes for dogs in need through rescue, rehabilitation, and education.

Animals
2
Bristow Barnyard Farm and Domestic Animal Rescue
Animals
3
Muttsnstuff

Rescue animals

Animals
4
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
5
Nc Dog Rescue Organization
—
6
Raskels Rescue
Animals
7
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
8
Washington Basset Rescue

Dog rescue

Animals
9
Humane Society of Union County Inc

The Humane Society of Union County exists to reduce the number of abused, abandoned, and neglected cats and dogs through rescue, rehabilitation, adoption, and spay and neuter.

Animals
10
Tennessee River Rescues

we exist to spay and neuter unwanted pets in our local area trying to find them a home to thrive in until the end of their time

Animals
11
Happy Tails Dog Rescue Inc

The Organization's mission is to rescue dogs from high-kill animal shelters and place them in loving forever homes. All dogs rescued are given necessary medical care prior to adoption, including required vaccinations. Dogs are placed in…

Animals
12
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boykin Spaniel Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is Montpelier Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYKIN SPANIEL SOCIETY: $292,450 · OtherBOYKIN SPANIEL SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $215,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOPE'S LEGACY EQUINE RESCUE INC: $35,000 · OtherLife Unli of VA-Rikki's Refuge: $27,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · Other+5 more: $80,000 · Other+5 moreMONTPELIER FOUNDATION: $405,000 · Arts & CultureMONTPELIER FOUNDATIONFAUQUIER SPCA INC: $30,000 · AnimalsMADISON-GREENE HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,000 · AnimalsGREEN DOGS UNLEASHED INC: $15,000 · AnimalsORANGE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $15,000 · AnimalsBOYKIN SPANIEL RESCUE INC: $10,000 · AnimalsSERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC: $30,000 · Human Services
Other$674,950Arts & Culture$405,000Animals$90,000Human Services$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONTPELIER FOUNDATION: $405,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetBOYKIN SPANIEL SOCIETY: $292,450 over 7y, 14% of budgetHOPE'S LEGACY EQUINE RESCUE INC: $35,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetFAUQUIER SPCA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC: $30,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetMADISON-GREENE HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetGREEN DOGS UNLEASHED INC: $15,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetORANGE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetBOYKIN SPANIEL RESCUE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONTPELIER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYKIN SPANIEL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE'S LEGACY EQUINE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds FAUQUIER SPCA INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON-GREENE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GREEN DOGS UNLEASHED INC ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYKIN SPANIEL RESCUE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charlottesville Area Community FoundationVA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · The J & E Berkley Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hickerson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hickerson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hickerson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Hickerson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hickerson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph