· Private foundation
The Hh Peterson & Howard Gcrockey Peterson Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of THE HH PETERSON & HOWARD GCROCKEY PETERSON FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KALIS CURE FOR PARALYSIS FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF BREVARD CO | $2,000 |
| UNITED WAY ST FRANCOIS COUNTY | $2,000 |
| ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| SERENITY HOSPICE CARE | $2,000 |
| MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $2,000 |
| GARDEN CLUB BY THE SEA | $1,000 |
| FARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE | $1,000 |
| PARKLAND HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| SHARED BLESSINGS | $1,000 |
| CAMP HOPE | $1,000 |
| NEW BEGINNINGS CHURCH | $1,000 |
| LINDENWOOD UNIVERSITY | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN LEGION BOY'S STATE | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PHPARKLAND HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +46%
- VOVISIONS OF HOPE TRAINING PROGRAM9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +103%
- FMFARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +207%
Funded once
- SCSPACE COAST RED CROSSone grant, 2020 · $1k
- OSOPERATION SMILE INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +26%
- FPFARMINGTON PET ADOPTION CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +61%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Tertiary care academic medical center
To operate a health care system providing medical excellence to the eastern region of south carolina and the extreme southeastern region of north carolina.
Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals is a Catholic organization that exists to provide medical and physical rehabilitation services to children and adults throughout the nation. We rehabilitate those who have sustained injuries or disabling…
Baptist memorial hospital-desoto, inc. provides quality medical health care regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, or age. its mission is to serve the community with respect to providing health care services and health…
To provide with compassion and dedication superior quality health care and rehabilitation for adults and to directly or indirectly coordinate arrangements and provision for comprehensive health care and social support services to frail…
To continuously improve the health of the communities we serve in the spirit of hope, compassion, respect and dignity.
No one should have to suffer, transition, or die alone. maitri provides compassionate residential care to low-income people who are in need of hospice or 24-hour care for people living with hiv/aids or recovering from gender affirmation…
As a catholic health system, rooted in the tradition of the sisters of the holy redeemer, we care, comfort and heal, following the example of jesus, proclaiming the hope god offers in the midst of human struggle.
The mission of sunshine haven is the establishment, management, and perpetuation of a special care facility to provide a peaceful, home-loving atmosphere where individuals with a terminal diagnosis may die naturally and in quiet dignity.
The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…
Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PARKLAND HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VISIONS OF HOPE TRAINING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds FARMINGTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CAMP HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds BREVARD ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds MONARCH FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SHARED BLESSINGS INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds SERENITY HOSPICECARE ↗
- Who funds THE CARING PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN LEGION BOYS STATE ↗
- Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
- Who funds FARMINGTON PET ADOPTION CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hh Peterson & Howard Gcrockey Peterson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.