· Private foundation
The Herman H Kaye Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CITY OF HOPE | $100,000 |
| FRIENDS OF MALIBU URGENT CARE CENTER | $10,000 |
| B'NAI SHALOM OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY | $10,000 |
| CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC | $10,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC | $5,000 |
| UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| GENERAL ISRAEL ORPHAN HOME FOR GIRLS JERUSALEM INC | $5,000 |
| CHILDRENS VILLAGE OF JERUSALEM INC | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN AIR MUSEUM IN BRITAIN | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against -23% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CRCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $83k · revenue +59%
- AAAMERICAN AIR MUSEUM IN BRITAIN8× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +338%
- TUThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum7× · 2018–2025 · $35k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- FIFTC INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -37%
- TITALMUDIC INSTITUTE OF CONNECTICUT INCone grant, 2017 · $5k
- CACalifornia Advocates for Nursing Home Reformgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Bikur cholim organizes and subsidizes medical treatment, speech and physical therapy, medication, durable medical equipment, blood products, homecare, transportation, housing for patients and family-members, meals, and diagnostics while…
Excellence in senior care reflective of jewish values.
The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.
The organization provides medical assistance & support for special needs children, fosters, promotes, & advances torah study and orthodox judaism, provides charity & passover assistance for the needy in the usa, israel, and the world.
Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…
Promote and support the galilee medical center by broadening its capability to provide the highest quality of medical care and other services to over 650,000 residents living along israel's northern border.
To add to the body of knowledge of the holocaust and remind the world that it should never happen again.
T'ruah engages in three strategies in our work: we organize rabbis, cantors and their communities to make an impact through specific human rights campaigns; we train rabbinical and cantorial students and rabbis and cantors to be powerful…
The mission of the Friends of the Jewish Museum of Rome Inc.(the "Organization") is to support charitable and educational organizations in Italy and in the U.S. The Organization's particular focus is to provide support to museums and other…
The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.
The Corporations mission is to empower older adults and their caregivers by providing quality human services inspired by Jewish values. Programs include home care assistance, caregiver support, transportation, fall prevention, friendly…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN AIR MUSEUM IN BRITAIN ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS VILLAGE OF JERUSALEM INC ↗
- Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
- Who funds GENERAL ISRAEL ORPHAN HOME FOR GIRLS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MALIBU URGENT CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CONEJO VALLEY SENIOR CONCERNS INC ↗
- Who funds FTC INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform ↗
- Who funds ELDERPRIDE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Herman H Kaye Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.