How much did THE HERBERT & DOROTHY ZULLIG grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 90% of THE HERBERT & DOROTHY ZULLIG’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k15 grants · $56k
$10k–50k6 grants · $107k

$4,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE HUB ON SMITH$30,000
SHERIDAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
SHERIDAN COLLEGE$20,000
THE BRINTON MUSEUM$12,000
SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST$10,000
SHERIDAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION$10,000
SHERIDAN COLLEGE - HOUSING SCH$9,000
LUNCH TOGETHERSOUP KITCH$8,000
GENESIS FOUNDATION INC$6,000
SHERIDAN COUNTY YMCA$5,000
PEOPLE ASSISTANCE FOOD BANK$4,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCK$3,000
SHERIDAN HIGH BOOSTER CLUB$3,000
THE FOOD GROUP$3,000
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER REGION II$3,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.4M · 23 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +90% since the first grant, against -96% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.4M

$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%

-96%

Still filing today

35%

14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalEnvironmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GF
GENESIS FOUNDATION INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +90%
SC
SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST
6× · 2019–2024 · $37k · revenue +442%
TF
THE FOOD GROUP
8× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +167%

Funded once

SC
SHERIDAN CO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
one grant, 2020 · $5k
SH
SHERIDAN HIGH SCHOOL
one grant, 2020 · $4k
SC
STORY COMMUNITY LIBRARY INC
one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -96%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Sheridan County Young Mens

Sheridan county men's chrisian association(YMCA)is a charitable community service organization that includes men, women and children of all ages, abilities, income, races and religions. We are dedicated to strengthening our communities.…

Human Services

Sheridan County Library Foundation

Sheridan county fulmer public library and the library's branches: for books, materials and equipment. all users of the library and the library's branches will benefit.

—

Sheridan Youth Assistance Inc

Building a healthy community for tomorrow by investing in the youth of today.

Human Services

Sheridan County Historical Society

The mission shall be to bring together those people interested in history and especially the history of sheridan county, ks. understanding the history of our community is basic to our democratic way of life, gives us a better understanding…

Arts & Culture

Sheridan Firefighters Association

To protect life and safety of property from threat of fires, natural or man made disasters and emergency rescues. toward that end, the corporation will endeavour to educate on prevention, and plan incident mitigation and appropriate…

Public Safety & Disaster

Sheridan Community Center

To provide and maintain a community center/building that offers space for various events and organizations in sheridan, texas and the local surrounding area.

Human Services

Sheridan Golf Club Inc

Provide and maintain a recreational facility for members

Recreation & Sports

Sheridan Recreation District

The organization's mission is to support the activities and programs of the sheridan recreation district

Recreation & Sports

Shoshoni Senior Citizens Inc

The purpose of the entity is to provide activities, wellness and nutrition programs for senior citizens in shoshoni, wy and the surrounding area.

Human Services

Sherman County Community Services Inc

To provide a community service by providing a place where a family can enjoy a safe environment

Community Improvement

Sherborn Rural Land Foundation

Environment

Downtown Sheridan Association

To preserve, enhance, and promote historic downtown sheridan to ensure future prosperity. the downtown sheridan area serves as the heartbeat of the community where people come together to enjoy local services, convenient shopping, and…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sheridan Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Big Horn Education Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

10/10

Grantees still filing

7/10

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,276,200Human Services$42,000Environment$37,000Education$25,000Food & Nutrition$22,500Crime & Legal$17,000Health$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott FoundationWY22.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott Foundation · The Roberts Family Foundation · Bf & Rose H Perkins Foundation · Joe and Arlene Watt Foundation Inc · Homer A Jr & Janet Scott Family Foundation · Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation · Wyoming Community Foundation · Chandler H Kibbee and Mercedes K · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation · Joe F and Roberta Napier Foundation · The Seidler Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE HERBERT & DOROTHY ZULLIG funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SHERIDAN HEALTH CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 201389307 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SHERIDAN HEALTH CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 26% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Herbert & Dorothy Zullig?

Find your warmest path to The Herbert & Dorothy Zullig through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE HERBERT & DOROTHY ZULLIG

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Herbert & Dorothy Zullig?

More from the funding graph

THE HERBERT & DOROTHY ZULLIG

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Herbert & Dorothy Zullig?

More from the funding graph