Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hendricks Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$42kReligion$33kHealth$31kInternational$10kHuman Services$7kHousing & Shelter$6kRecreation & Sports$4kPublic Benefit$300Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,985
Median grant
4
States reached
$597k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$6,250
URSULINE HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
OUR LADY OF GRACE CATHOLIC CHURCH$3,400
UNBOUND$1,985
RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY$500
BLESSED SACREMENT CHURCH$250
OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL$200
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNBOUND: $2k → 16%UNBOUND: $2k → 16%UNBOUND: $2k → 16%UNBOUND: $2k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $820 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
OH
CT
CA
CO
VA
KS
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$109k · 12 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
22

Total granted

$109k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+18%

Still filing today

25%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UH
    URSULINE HIGH SCHOOL
    7× · 2018–2025 · $27k
  • CC
    CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
    3× · 2018–2022 · $20k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF GRACE CATHOLIC CHURCH
    7× · 2019–2025 · $16k

Funded once

  • CF
    CBCC FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY WELLNESS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -68%
  • CB
    COMPREHENSIVE BLOOD & CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • MH
    MERCY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
2
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
3
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
4
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
5
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
6
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
7
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
8
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
Community Mercy Health Partners

The mission of community mercy health partners is to carry out the bon secours mercy health mission within our community by providing safe, effective, patient/resident centered, timely and cost efficient care and education to meet the…

Health
11
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
12
St Martin Hospital Inc

To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Inc; the most unlike its peers is Unbound. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

URSULINE HIGH SCHOOL: $27,000 · OtherURSULINE HIGH SCHOOLCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $20,400 · OtherCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLOUR LADY OF GRACE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $15,675 · OtherOUR LADY OF GRACE CATHOLIC CHURCHCOMPREHENSIVE BLOOD & CANCER CENTER: $10,000 · OtherCOMPREHENSIVE BLOOD & CANCER CENTERMERCY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherMERCY HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $7,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOUNDATION OF FUENTE DE ARMOR: $6,600 · OtherFOUNDATION OF FUENTE DE ARMORBLESSED SACREMENT CHURCH: $6,150 · OtherCATHOLIC CLUB OF TOLEDO: $4,500 · Other+17 more: $12,799 · Other+17 moreUnbound: $12,135 · Human ServicesUnboundCBCC FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY WELLNESS INC: $10,000 · Health+2 more: $510 · HealthRESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY: $6,779 · Housing & ShelterFLYING HORSE FARMS: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $250 · Recreation & SportsCommunity Bible Study: $200 · Religion
Other$120,374Human Services$12,135Health$10,510Housing & Shelter$6,779Recreation & Sports$2,250Religion$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnbound: $12,135 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCBCC FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY WELLNESS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY: $6,779 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFLYING HORSE FARMS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Bible Study: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Unbound ↗
  • Who funds CBCC FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY WELLNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds FLYING HORSE FARMS ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Bible Study ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hendricks Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hendricks Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hendricks Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph