Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Helm Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$195k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$295kEducation$180kHuman Services$150kHousing & Shelter$120kArts & Culture$80kReligion$40kInternational$6kCrime & Legal$3k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $190k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EVERYBODY'S PLACE$45,000
QUILLIAN CENTER$40,000
THE SAMARITAN CENTER$30,000
NEIGHBORS IN ACTION$25,000
TOMAGWA MINISTRIES INC$25,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$15,000
MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION$10,000
ST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $300k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEIGHBORS IN ACTION: $25k → 16%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%NEIGHBORS IN ACTION: $25k → 16%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%NEIGHBORS IN ACTION: $25k → 16%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%NEIGHBORS IN ACTION: $25k → 16%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%THE SAMARITAN CENTER: $30k → 16%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%THE SAMARITAN CENTER: $30k → 16%THE SAMARITAN CENTER: $30k → 16%THE SAMARITAN CENTER: $30k → 16%THE SAMARITAN CENTER: $30k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$852k · 9 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$852k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+137%

Still filing today

67%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SAMARITAN CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $150k · revenue +51%
  • NI
    Neighbors In Action Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +7%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $85k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • SG
    STRATEGIC GLOBAL MISSIONS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +137%
  • CO
    CLUB OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • SR
    ST ROSE OF LIMA
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Samaritan Ministry of Greater Washington

Samaritan Ministry of Greater Washington is a faith-based community partnership bringing together neighbors who face poverty, homelessness, or other debilitating challenges with partner leaders, donors, volunteers, and staff in a shared…

Human Services
2
El Buen Samaritano Episcopal Mission

El Buen Samaritano is an outreach ministry of the Episcopal Diocese of Texas committed to recognizing the dignity of all by ensuring access to health care education and essential needs that lead to healthy productive and secure lives.

—
3
New Life Advance International Inc

The mission of New Life Advance International is to develop gifted leaders who will make disciples among the nations, establish ongoing church planting movements, and work for the relief of human suffering.

International
4
First Baptist Denton Ministry Center

The mission of First Refuge Ministries is to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ by offering essential services to those in need within our community. We care for their spiritual, emotional, and physical needs.

Health
5
Missio Theological Seminary

To incarnate and communicate the story of jesus with humility and authenticity, fidelity to scripture, appreciation of the christian tradition, and sensitivity to the needs and aspirations of postmodern culture.

Religion
6
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
7
The Center for Integrative Counseling

The Centers founding mission since 1968 has been to make quality mental health care accessible and to integrate faith and spirituality within the therapy and psychological services provided by its therapists and psychologists.

Health
8
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
9
Fellowship Village

Committed to the quality of life...unwaivering in achieving excellence. fellowships mission is to be the regions best community-based care facility in every aspect of the services we provide

Human Services
10
The Learning Institute of Texas

To provide educational and humanitarian services to those in need for the purpose of advancing Christian values in the United States and other nations

Education
11
Ubi Caritas a Healing Ministry

To provide medical and dental care and health education to low-income and uninsured residents of southeast texas.

—
12
Siloam Health

Siloam's mission is to share the love of christ by serving those in need through health care.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marbridge Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Strategic Global Missions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVERYBODY'S PLACE: $120,000 · OtherEVERYBODY'S PLACEQUILLIAN CENTER: $85,000 · OtherQUILLIAN CENTERST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $82,000 · OtherST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL+4 more: $15,500 · OtherSAMARITAN CENTER INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN CENTER INCNeighbors In Action Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesNeighbors In Action IncMARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesMARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INCTOMAGWA MINISTRIES INC DBA TOMAGWA HEALTHCARE MINISTRIES: $145,000 · HealthTOMAGWA MINISTRIES…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $85,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVER…ASCENDING LEADERS: $35,000 · ReligionSTRATEGIC GLOBAL MISSIONS INC: $6,000 · Religion
Other$302,500Human Services$300,000Health$145,000Education$85,000Religion$41,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN CENTER INC: $150,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetTOMAGWA MINISTRIES INC DBA TOMAGWA HEALTHCARE MINISTRIES: $145,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetNeighbors In Action Inc: $100,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $85,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetASCENDING LEADERS: $35,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetSTRATEGIC GLOBAL MISSIONS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMAGWA MINISTRIES INC DBA TOMAGWA HEALTHCARE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Neighbors In Action Inc ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ASCENDING LEADERS ↗
  • Who funds STRATEGIC GLOBAL MISSIONS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Helm Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Helm Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Helm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph