Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Helen G Hauben Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$225k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$173kEducation$172kArts & Culture$125kEnvironment$96kYouth Development$82kInternational$68kAnimals$55kFood & Nutrition$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $96k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $129k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,500
EMERSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$20,000
GROTON HILL MUSIC$12,500
GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$10,350
MUSEUM OF SCIENCE$10,300
Individual grant recipient$10,250
USS CONSTITUTION MUSEUM$10,000
CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION$10,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY$7,650
TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS$5,175
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MA$5,150
ROSIE'S PLACE$5,150
FISHER HOUSE$5,135
Individual grant recipient$5,125
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
OR
SD
RI
CA
VA
AZ
AR
DC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 44 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
7

Total granted

$1.1M
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+18%

Still filing today

52%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $80k · revenue +41%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +24%
  • SV
    SUDBURY VALLEY TRUSTEES INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -14%
  • MG
    MA GOLF ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • PF
    PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc

To protect the nature of massachusetts for people and for wildlife through education, land conservation, advocacy, scientific research, and habitat stewardship/restoration.

Environment
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
10
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
11
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
12
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of Reservations; the most unlike its peers is Littleton Scholarship Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
18/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $62,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $57,500 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $50,350 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEMERSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $47,500 · OtherEMERSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $40,100 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $32,750 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $28,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $24,125 · OtherWildlife Conservation Society: $28,250 · Other+29 more: $237,535 · Other+29 moreGROTON HILL MUSIC INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureGROTON HILL…MUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $29,300 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF S…USS CONSTITUTION MUSEUM INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureUSS CONSTIT…MUSIC WORCESTER INC: $14,600 · Arts & CultureMUSIC WORCE…Merrimack Repertory Theatre Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION: $107,500 · EducationCHILDREN'S …OGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE: $5,500 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationLAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $80,400 · Youth Development+1 more: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentSUDBURY VALLEY TRUSTEES INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $23,175 · EnvironmentAppalachian Mountain Club: $12,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $9,000 · EnvironmentPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $25,650 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,000 · HealthGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $30,000 · Human Services
Other$723,610Arts & Culture$118,900Education$114,000Youth Development$81,900Environment$74,175Health$30,650Human Services$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION: $107,500 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetLAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $80,400 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $50,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGROTON HILL MUSIC INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $40,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSUDBURY VALLEY TRUSTEES INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $29,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $28,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $25,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $23,175 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $22,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUSS CONSTITUTION MUSEUM INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMUSIC WORCESTER INC: $14,600 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $14,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON CASA INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWICN PUBLIC RADIO INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetOGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMerrimack Repertory Theatre Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL MASS /METROWEST INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLittleton Scholarship Trust: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds GROTON HILL MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SUDBURY VALLEY TRUSTEES INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds USS CONSTITUTION MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC WORCESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES ↗
  • Who funds WICN PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds OGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Tower Corporation Foundation IncMA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Aaf Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Helen G Hauben Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Helen G Hauben Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Boston Casa Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Uss Constitution Museum Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Music Worcester Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Merrimack Repertory Theatre Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wicn Public Radio Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
  • Museum of Science: 0% of income from government
  • Groton Hill Music Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Helen G Hauben’s filings →

More from the funding graph