Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Helen and Jose Colton Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$345k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$47k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$666kPublic Safety & Disaster$346kAnimals$247kArts & Culture$226kInternational$149kEducation$144kHuman Services$136kReligion$109kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $95k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $250k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POINT ROBERTS VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS CHARITABLE SOCIETY$46,600
SHADOW HILLS RIDING CLUB$44,200
HAPPY CATS HAVEN$30,000
RISE UP SCHOOLS$27,000
MENDING KIDS$25,000
SAFE HAVEN MEDICAL OUTREACH PROGRAM INC$21,500
LUPITA PROJECT$13,500
BRIDGE TO HOME$12,500
ACADEMY FOUNDATION (ACADEMY MUSEUM OF MOTION PICTURES)$10,000
ROBINS NEST RESCUE$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LA (CATCH)$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,975
CDT KIDS$7,500
VALOR HEALING FARMS$6,400
SINGER SANCTUARY$6,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $169k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LOVE SOCIETY: $3k → 11%VETERANS MIRACLE CENTER ERIE: $8k → 15%HAPPY BOTTOMS: $2k → 15%SOLDIER'S BEST FRIEND: $8k → 11%DAVENPORT SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 11%SOLDIER'S BEST FRIEND: $5k → 11%DAVENPORT SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 11%SOLDIER'S BEST FRIEND: $5k → 11%SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS: $109k → 14%SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS: $10k → 14%IMPACT FOUNDATION LA: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
MI
NY
NV
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
AZ
TN
NC
SC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of The Helen and Jose Colton Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 58% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 46%.

The Helen and Jose Colton Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 36 repeat orgs$559k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
53

Total granted

$1.7M
$449k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+7%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePublic BenefitEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $119k · revenue +350% · 79% of their budget
  • MK
    Mending Kids International dba Mending Kids
    5× · 2021–2025 · $108k · revenue +126%
  • SH
    SAFE HAVEN MEDICAL OUTREACH PROGRAM INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $47k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • H4
    HOMES 4 FAMILIES
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • LC
    LINCOLN COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $45k
  • PR
    POINT ROBERTS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
2
Happy Tails Animal Sanctuary
Animals
3
My Happy Place Animal Sanctuary

My Happy Place Animal Sanctuary is a registered 501(c)3 non profit organization dedicated to providing rescue, rehabilitation and refuge to at-risk animals.

Animals
4
From the Heart Animal Sanctuary
Animals
5
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
6
Happy Hen Animal Sanctuary
Animals
7
Veteran Equine Therapy Stables
Public Benefit
8
Ark-Valley Humane Society Inc

Ark-Valley Humane Society's (AVHS) Mission is ensuring the welfare of companion animals through compassion and care. AVHS operated an open-admission animal shelter for Chaffee County, Colorado.

Animals
9
Wild Souls Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation
Animals
10
Amazing Dogs

Our mission is to save dogs in distressing conditions on both sides of the California/Mexican border. We provide them with essential medical treatment and care to help them regain their health, and ultimately match them with loving homes…

Animals
11
Platte Ranch Forever Home Sanctuary
Animals
12
Sanctuary At Bluebird Lane

We are a Wyoming based non-profit dedicated to providing support, transitional services, and a loving home for hounds, burros, horses, pigs, sheep, and chickens. While we provide sanctuary for our farm and hound friends, our primary focus…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pilots to the Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is Red Bucket Equine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/48
Grantees still filing
23/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

POINT ROBERTS VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS CHARITABLE SOCIETY: $246,200 · OtherPOINT ROBERTS VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS CHARITABLE SOCIETYMending Kids International dba Mending Kids: $107,500 · OtherMending Kids International dba Mending KidsPROVIDENCE ST MARY'S FOUNDATION (WALLA WALLA WA): $87,500 · OtherPROVIDENCE ST MARY'S FOUNDATION (WALLA WALLA WA)CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LA (CATCH): $73,150 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LA (CATCH)POINT ROBERTS CIRCLE OF CARE FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherHOMES 4 FAMILIES: $50,000 · OtherLINCOLN COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT: $45,000 · OtherACADEMY FOUNDATION (ACADEMY MUSEUM OF MOTION PICTURES): $43,000 · Other+60 more: $565,176 · Other+60 moreSHADOW HILLS RIDING CLUB INC: $279,900 · HealthSHADOW HILLS RIDING …SAFE HAVEN MEDICAL OUTREACH PROGRAM INC: $46,500 · HealthSAFE HAVEN MEDICAL O…Lupita Project: $38,650 · HealthLupita ProjectCure Sanfilippo Foundation: $25,000 · HealthCure Sanfilippo Foun…+3 more: $12,500 · HealthBARN SANCTUARY: $40,758 · AnimalsBARN SANC…HAPPY CATS HAVEN INC: $30,000 · AnimalsHAPPY CAT…WILDLIFE WAYSTATION: $30,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE …SINGER SANCTUARY: $26,250 · AnimalsSINGER SA…THE LITTLE ZOO: $20,000 · AnimalsTHE LITTL…BLUE MOUNTAIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 · AnimalsBLUE MOUN…+9 more: $22,000 · Animals+9 moreSADDLES FOR SOLDIERS INC: $119,200 · Human ServicesSOLDIERS BEST FRIEND: $17,500 · Human ServicesThe Impact Foundation LA Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesDAVENPORT SENIOR CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesVETERANS MIRACLE CENTER: $8,000 · Human Services+2 more: $4,500 · Human ServicesNEW MUSICALS INC: $80,000 · Arts & CultureCULTURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $33,100 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $10,000 · Arts & CultureACADEMY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureVALOR HEALING FARMS: $33,700 · Public BenefitTEAM ADDO INC: $5,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $1,000 · Public BenefitBRIDGE TO HOME SCV: $22,500 · Community ImprovementMACKINAC ASSOCIATES: $1,800 · Community Improvement
Other$1,277,526Health$402,550Animals$179,008Human Services$169,200Arts & Culture$133,100Public Benefit$39,700Community Improvement$24,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHADOW HILLS RIDING CLUB INC: $279,900 over 6y, 10% of budgetSADDLES FOR SOLDIERS INC: $119,200 over 2y, 79% of budgetMending Kids International dba Mending Kids: $107,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetNEW MUSICALS INC: $80,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetSAFE HAVEN MEDICAL OUTREACH PROGRAM INC: $46,500 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetBARN SANCTUARY: $40,758 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetLupita Project: $38,650 over 4y, 29% of budgetVALOR HEALING FARMS: $33,700 over 4y, 23% of budgetCULTURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $33,100 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetWILDLIFE WAYSTATION: $30,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSINGER SANCTUARY: $26,250 over 3y, 12% of budgetCure Sanfilippo Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBRIDGE TO HOME SCV: $22,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LITTLE ZOO: $20,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetSOLDIERS BEST FRIEND: $17,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITE TO LIGHT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetACADEMY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAGINAW BASIN LAND CONSERVANCY: $8,700 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetVETERANS MIRACLE CENTER: $8,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYouth Documentary Academy: $6,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTEAM ADDO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCOLORADO YOUTH OUTDOORS CHARITABLE TRUST: $4,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFISH TALES: $4,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDonkeyLand: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHEAST VOLUSIA HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVALLEY SOCCER EDUCATION PROGRAM: $2,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPEWELL RANCH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLOVE SOCIETY: $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetRED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPawsitive Teams Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHAPPYBOTTOMS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHITMAN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMACKINAC ASSOCIATES: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGYMNASTICS OLYMPICA USA INC: $1,679 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARLEYS HOPE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHADOW HILLS RIDING CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Mending Kids International dba Mending Kids ↗
  • Who funds NEW MUSICALS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN MEDICAL OUTREACH PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds BARN SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds Lupita Project ↗
  • Who funds VALOR HEALING FARMS ↗
  • Who funds CULTURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY CATS HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE WAYSTATION ↗
  • Who funds SINGER SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds Cure Sanfilippo Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE TO HOME SCV ↗
  • Who funds THE LITTLE ZOO ↗
  • Who funds SOLDIERS BEST FRIEND ↗
  • Who funds BLUE MOUNTAIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Petco LoveTX14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Petco Love · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · The Michelson Found Animals Foundation Inc · Petsmart Charities Inc · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · California Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Helen and Jose Colton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Helen and Jose Colton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Helen and Jose Colton Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Helen and Jose Colton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Helen and Jose Colton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph