Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Heidtke Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$33kAnimals$6kYouth Development$5kScience & Tech$5kEducation$4kPhilanthropy$2kReligion$1kHealth$400Other$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$15,000
YOUTH AMERICA GRAND PRIX$5,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY$5,000
ARCHAECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$5,000
ALISON COOK BEATTY DANCE$2,000
MISCELLAMEOUS CHARITIES$1,998
THE GROLIER CLUB$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KAATSBAAN DANCE: $5k → 9%JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER: $3k → 9%ARCHAECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $5k → 13%YOUTH AMERICA GRAND PRIX: $5k → 17%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $5k → 28%AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $500 → 10%BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE: $500 → 7%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $5k → 12%ST JOSEPH INDIAN SCHOOL: $500 → 15%RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL: $500 → 42%KAATSBAAN DANCE: $5k → 9%ALISON COOK BEATTY DANCE: $2k → 13%GROLIER CLUB OF NEW YORK: $2k → 17%RAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE: $400 → 7%THE GROLIER CLUB: $1k → 17%RAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE: $400 → 7%GROLIER CLUB OF NEW YORK: $600 → 17%ST ELIZABETH CHURCH: $600 → 7%THE GROLIER CLUB: $500 → 17%EASTERN CHRISTAIN CHILDREN RETREAT: $400 → 7%MISCELLAMEOUS CHARITIES: $2k → 17%ALISON COOK BEATTY DANCE: $11k → 17%ALISON COOK BEATTY DANCE: $2k → 17%JUILLIARD SCHOOL: $2k → 17%ALISON COOK BEATTY DANCE: $1k → 17%PARSONS DANCE CO: $15k → 17%RESIDENT ACTING COMPANY: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$32k · 6 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$32k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+28%

Still filing today

33%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ALISON COOK BEATTY DANCE INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $16k · revenue +31%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k
  • GC
    GROLIER CLUB OF NEW YORK
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • TR
    THE RESIDENT ACTING COMPANY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +159%
  • JB
    JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York City Ballet Inc

Perform, promote and sustain classical ballet.

Arts & Culture
2
Mccarter Theatre Company

Mccarter is one of the country's flagship theatres and a cultural asset for all of central new jersey. a nationally renowned, independent performing arts center located on the campus of princeton university, the company is a…

Arts & Culture
3
Amda Inc (American Musical and Dramatic Academy)

Amda is committed to providing an unsurpassed performing arts education to a diverse community of creative artists. amda seeks to be both the school and the stage, where students are given the support and the freedom to find their voice…

—
4
The Actors Center Inc

Creative residency programs, artist development workshops, advanced training opportunities, and mentorship for professional actors and people who wish to participate in the performing arts.

Arts & Culture
5
Princeton Ballet Society

Princeton ballet society's mission is to nurture a lifelong love of dance and lift the collective spirit through excellent, relevant, and accessible artistic and educational programs, with a focus on classical ballet.

Arts & Culture
6
Transport Group Inc Dba Transport Group Theatre Company

Producing and developing plays and musicals.

Arts & Culture
7
Atlantic Theater Company

At Atlantic, our aim is singular: to empower simple and honest storytelling that fosters greater understanding of our shared world. Across our work, we are a family of artists dedicated to exploring essential truths onstage, be it a show…

Arts & Culture
8
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
9
Seventh Regiment Armory Conservancy Inc

Park avenue armory's mission is to enable a diverse range of artists to create, students to explore, and audiences to experience epic, adventurous, relevant work that cannot be done elsewhere in new york. with its soaring…

Arts & Culture
10
Brooklyn Academy of Music Inc

The mission of bam is to be the home for curious people and adventurous ideas. bam supports artistic experimentation and champions inclusion and accessibility throughout the arts as presenter, activator, and connector.

—
11
Tigerlion Arts
Arts & Culture
12
Move(Nyc) Foundation Inc

Move|nyc| is a civic arts and social justice organization committed to cultivating a more diverse and inclusive society through transforming the field of professional dance. more than an arts organization, move|nyc| is a movement for…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth America Grand Prix Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $5,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBARCHAECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $5,000 · OtherARCHAECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICAGROLIER CLUB OF NEW YORK: $2,100 · OtherMISCELLAMEOUS CHARITIES: $1,998 · OtherTHE GROLIER CLUB: $1,500 · Other+4 more: $2,500 · Other+4 moreALISON COOK BEATTY DANCE INC: $16,478 · Arts & CultureALISON COOK BEATTY DANCE INCTHE RESIDENT ACTING COMPANY INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE RESIDENT ACTING COMPANY INCYOUTH AMERICA GRAND PRIX INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureYOUTH AMERICA GRAND PRIX INCJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INCWildlife Conservation Society: $5,000 · AnimalsRAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $1,300 · AnimalsJUILLIARD SCHOOL: $2,000 · EducationAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $500 · Education
Other$43,098Arts & Culture$28,978Animals$6,300Education$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALISON COOK BEATTY DANCE INC: $16,478 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RESIDENT ACTING COMPANY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetYOUTH AMERICA GRAND PRIX INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUILLIARD SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Heidtke Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Heidtke Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Hope Christian Services: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Heidtke Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Heidtke Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Heidtke’s filings →

More from the funding graph